Feb 26, 2026·6 min read·95 visits
The Yii2 framework's `__set()` magic method allows developers to attach 'behaviors' dynamically. However, prior to version 2.0.48, it failed to validate that user-supplied configurations were actually Behaviors before instantiating them. Attackers can exploit this via mass assignment to instantiate arbitrary classes (like Guzzle gadgets) and achieve Remote Code Execution.
A critical Unsafe Reflection vulnerability in the core `yii\base\Component` class of the Yii2 framework allows attackers to instantiate arbitrary objects via the framework's behavior attachment mechanism. By leveraging PHP magic methods and the dependency injection container, remote attackers can execute arbitrary code (RCE) or perform other malicious actions by manipulating request parameters.
In the world of PHP frameworks, "Magic Methods" are the double-edged sword that developers love and security researchers drool over. Yii2, one of the heavyweights of the PHP ecosystem, relies extensively on __get, __set, and __call to implement its component-based architecture. This allows for mixins, dynamic properties, and event handling that feels almost like wizardry.
At the heart of this system is yii\base\Component. This class is the great-grandfather of nearly everything in a Yii2 application—Models, Controllers, Views, you name it. If you find a bug here, you aren't just breaking a feature; you are breaking the foundation.
CVE-2024-4990 allows us to abuse a specific feature of this component system: Behaviors. Behaviors are Yii2's way of injecting functionality into a class at runtime. The framework allows you to attach a behavior simply by setting a property that starts with as . For example, $model->{'as timestamp'} = TimestampBehavior::class;. It's a convenient piece of syntactic sugar, but as we're about to see, it's also a convenient entry point for Remote Code Execution.
The vulnerability lies in how yii\base\Component::__set() handles these dynamic behavior assignments. The logic is simple: check if the property name starts with as , trim the prefix to get the behavior name, and then instantiate the value provided.
Here is the logic in pseudocode terms: "If the user sends me a property named as evil, take the value they sent, create an object out of it, and attach it to the component." The critical failure here is the order of operations. The code calls Yii::createObject($value)—a powerful factory method that wraps a Dependency Injection (DI) container—before checking if the resulting object is actually a valid Behavior.
Yii::createObject is incredibly flexible. If you pass it an array with a class key, it will instantiate that class. If you pass it arguments, it will feed them to the constructor. Because __set is reachable via user input (e.g., during mass assignment of POST data to a Model), an attacker can trick the application into instantiating any class available in the autoloader, not just the intended Behaviors. It's like a nightclub bouncer who lets people in before checking their ID.
Let's look at the vulnerable code in yii\base\Component.php prior to version 2.0.48. This snippet shows the __set implementation:
public function __set($name, $value)
{
// ... standard setter logic ...
// The Vulnerable Logic
} elseif (strncmp($name, 'as ', 3) === 0) {
// as behavior: attach behavior
$name = trim(substr($name, 3));
// DANGER: Yii::createObject is called on user-controlled $value
$this->attachBehavior($name, $value instanceof Behavior ? $value : Yii::createObject($value));
return;
}
// ...
}The line $value instanceof Behavior ? $value : Yii::createObject($value) is the killer. If $value is an array (which it will be coming from a JSON payload), instanceof fails, so it proceeds to Yii::createObject($value). By the time the code realizes the object isn't a Behavior (inside attachBehavior), the object has already been created, and its constructor has already run.
Now, look at the initial patch (which was later bypassed, but we'll get to that):
// The "Fix"
if ($value instanceof Behavior) {
$this->attachBehavior($name, $value);
} elseif (isset($value['class']) && is_subclass_of($value['class'], Behavior::class, true)) {
// Checking class name before instantiation
$this->attachBehavior($name, Yii::createObject($value));
} ...The developers attempted to validate the class key before instantiation. However, they missed a crucial detail about their own DI container: Yii2 supports __class as an alias for class. This oversight led to CVE-2024-58136, a regression that kept the door wide open.
To exploit this, we need a "Gadget Chain". Since we can instantiate any class, we need a class that does something dangerous in its __construct or __destruct methods. A classic favorite in the PHP ecosystem is GuzzleHttp\Psr7\FnStream.
When FnStream is destroyed (which happens when the script ends or the object is discarded), it executes a user-defined callback. This gives us instant RCE.
The Attack Flow:
$model->load($_POST) or parses JSON into a component configuration.as exploit to trigger the __set logic.Proof of Concept (RCE via Guzzle):
{
"User": {
"username": "admin",
"as exploit": {
"class": "GuzzleHttp\\Psr7\\FnStream",
"methods": {
"close": "passthru",
"args": ["id; ls -la"]
}
}
}
}When Yii2 processes this, it instantiates FnStream. The framework realizes FnStream isn't a Behavior and throws an exception or discards it. However, the object was created. When PHP creates the exception or finishes the request, the FnStream object is garbage collected. Its __destruct method fires, calling close(), which runs passthru('id; ls -la').
This is a Critical severity vulnerability because it requires zero authentication (if the vulnerable endpoint is public, like a registration or login page) and results in full Remote Code Execution.
Yii2 is used by massive enterprise applications, CRMs, and e-commerce platforms. An attacker exploiting this can:
PDO object to connect to an external malicious MySQL server (SSRF) or simply use the shell access to dump the local database.Because the vulnerability exists in the base Component class, the attack surface is effectively "everywhere mass assignment is used in the application." It transforms a standard development convenience into a catastrophic security hole.
The remediation journey for this bug was bumpy. The initial fix in 2.0.48 was incomplete because it only validated the class array key, ignoring the __class alias supported by Yii's DI container.
Immediate Action Required:
yiisoft/yii2 version 2.0.52 or later. Do not stop at 2.0.48 or 2.0.51, as they are still vulnerable to the bypass (CVE-2024-58136).$model->load($_POST) blindly on sensitive models without a strict scenarios() definition or explicit attribute safe-listing.Defense in Depth:
If you cannot upgrade immediately, you can implement a WAF rule to block any HTTP request body containing keys matching the regex "as\s+[a-zA-Z0-9_]+". However, WAFs are bypassable (e.g., via JSON encoding tricks), so patching the root cause is the only real solution.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H| Product | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|
yiisoft/yii2 Yii Software | < 2.0.52 | 2.0.52 |
| Attribute | Detail |
|---|---|
| CWE ID | CWE-470 |
| Attack Vector | Network |
| CVSS | 9.1 (Critical) |
| Impact | Remote Code Execution (RCE) |
| Exploit Status | PoC Available / Weaponized |
| Prerequisites | None (if endpoint exposes mass assignment) |
Use of Externally-Controlled Input to Select Classes or Code (Unsafe Reflection)
A technical breakdown of the OS command injection vulnerability in the shell-quote NPM package (CVE-2026-9277 / GHSA-w7jw-789q-3m8p). The bug resides in the character-by-character backslash-escaping logic applied to the .op field of object-tokens within the quote() function, which fails to match and escape line terminators due to a regex matching oversight in JavaScript. This allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary shell commands if they can control inputs processed by this library.
A high-severity memory corruption vulnerability exists in the V8 JavaScript engine of Google Chrome before versions 149.0.7827.102/103. The flaw arises from an incorrect bounds-check elimination during JIT compilation by the TurboFan optimizer, allowing remote attackers to achieve out-of-bounds read and write access inside the sandboxed renderer process.
An improper authentication vulnerability (CWE-287) exists in the legacy, deprecated Internet Key Exchange version 1 (IKEv1) key exchange protocol implementation in Check Point Security Gateways. The vulnerability is caused by a logic flow weakness during the certificate validation process for Remote Access VPN and Mobile Access (SSL VPN) connections. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this weakness to bypass user authentication entirely, establishing a fully functional Remote Access VPN connection without a valid password.
GeoNode versions prior to 4.4.5 and 5.0.2 are vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the service registration endpoint. Authenticated attackers with low privileges can exploit insufficient input validation in the Web Map Service (WMS) registration module to force the application server to make outbound network queries to loopback addresses, private RFC1918 subnets, link-local scopes, and cloud metadata endpoints. This technical report details the mechanics of the vulnerability, the underlying architectural flaw, and how to effectively remediate and mitigate the associated security risks.
CVE-2022-0492 is a high-severity missing authorization vulnerability in the Linux kernel's Control Groups (cgroups) v1 implementation. The flaw resides within the cgroup_release_agent_write function in kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c, where the kernel fails to validate if the process writing to the release_agent file possesses administrative capabilities in the initial user namespace. This allows a local attacker inside a container with root privileges (UID 0) to abuse user namespaces, mount a cgroups v1 directory, modify the release_agent parameter, and execute arbitrary commands on the host system as host root, effectively achieving a complete container escape.
NocoDB is subject to an insufficient session expiration vulnerability where OAuth access and refresh tokens are not invalidated or revoked during security-sensitive actions such as password changes, forgot-password requests, or password resets. This allows an attacker possessing an active OAuth token to maintain unauthorized persistence.