The Null Identity: Unmasking Fiber's Critical 'Zero-UUID' Vulnerability

Fiber promotes itself as the 'Express.js of Go'—fast, minimalist, and developer-friendly. It’s built for speed, often touted as one of the fastest HTTP engines available. But in the world of systems programming, speed frequently comes at the cost of safety, specifically when it comes to error handling. The philosophy of 'move fast and break things' is fine for a UI, but it is absolute poison for cryptography.

This vulnerability is a classic example of 'silent failure.' In a robust security architecture, if a critical component like a Random Number Generator (RNG) fails, the system should crash immediately (fail-secure). It should scream, panic, and refuse to process another byte. Fiber, however, did the polite thing: it shrugged, ignored the error, and handed the user a token made of zeros.

CVE-2025-66630 isn't just a bug; it's a fundamental architectural oversight in how the framework handles the absence of entropy. It turns what should be a unique, cryptographically secure identifier into a constant, predictable value (00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000). If your session ID, CSRF token, or request ID is derived from this function, you don't have a security system anymore—you have a hardcoded backdoor.

The root cause lies in how Fiber interacts with Go's crypto/rand package, specifically on Go versions prior to 1.24. In the Unix philosophy, read operations can fail. They can fail because of file descriptor exhaustion, permissions issues, or simply because the entropy pool is temporarily starving. A responsible application checks for these failures.

In Fiber's utils package, the UUID() and UUIDv4() functions are responsible for generating unique identifiers. These functions call rand.Read(), which attempts to pull random bytes from the OS (usually via /dev/urandom or getrandom).

The flaw is almost insultingly simple: Fiber called rand.Read(), but when the operating system replied with "I can't do that right now," the code simply returned nil or ignored the error entirely.

Because Go initializes byte slices to zero, the buffer intended to hold random data remained a sequence of 0x00 bytes. The function then proceeded to format these null bytes into a standard UUID string. The result is a valid-looking, but entirely non-random UUID. This transforms a probabilistic uniqueness guarantee (1 in 2^122) into a deterministic certainty of collision.

Let's look at the smoking gun in utils/common.go. This is a textbook example of why Go's if err != nil idiom exists—and why ignoring it is fatal.

The Vulnerable Code

// BEFORE: The "Ostrich Algorithm" (Head in sand)
func UUID() string {
    uuidSetup.Do(func() {
        // CRITICAL FLAW: The error is checked, but logic returns
        // leaving uuidSeed as default zero-value memory.
        if _, err := rand.Read(uuidSeed[:]); err != nil {
            return 
        }
        uuidCounter = binary.LittleEndian.Uint64(uuidSeed[:8])
    })
    // Code continues to generate UUIDs based on uuidSeed...
}

When rand.Read fails, the return statement exits the anonymous function, but uuidSeed (a package-level variable) is never mutated. It stays [0, 0, 0, ...].

The Fix

The patch introduced in version 2.52.11 (Commit eb874b6f6c5896b968d9b0ab2b56ac7052cb0ee1) changes this behavior to "fail-secure". If we can't be random, we shouldn't be running.

// AFTER: Fail-Secure
func UUID() string {
    uuidSetup.Do(func() {
        if _, err := rand.Read(uuidSeed[:]); err != nil {
            // Panic ensures the app crashes rather than running insecurely
            panic(fmt.Sprintf("utils: failed to seed UUID generator: %v", err))
        }
        uuidCounter = binary.LittleEndian.Uint64(uuidSeed[:8])
    })
    // ...
}

The developers also patched UUIDv4 to ensure that if the external Google UUID library fails, the application doesn't fall back to the insecure internal implementation without a safety check.

How do we weaponize this? We need to force the server into a state where rand.Read() fails. In a high-load environment or a constrained container, this is easier than it sounds. The most reliable method is File Descriptor Exhaustion.

Attack Scenario

1. Preparation: The attacker identifies a target Fiber server running on an older Go version (< 1.24) and Fiber < 2.52.11.
2. Trigger: The attacker floods the server with open connections (DoS), exhausting the available file descriptors. Since reading /dev/urandom often requires a file descriptor, the OS refuses the read syscall.
3. The Event: A victim logs in. The Session Middleware calls utils.UUIDv4() to generate a Session ID.
4. The Failure: rand.Read fails. Fiber ignores it. The Session ID becomes 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000.
5. The Capture: The attacker, knowing this condition exists, simply sets their own browser cookie to 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000.

Suddenly, the attacker is logged in as the victim. In fact, every user who logs in during this entropy starvation period will share the exact same session storage. It’s a massive collision where private data leaks across user boundaries.

> [!NOTE] > This isn't just about sessions. CSRF tokens, typically used to prevent state-changing attacks, also become the zero-UUID. An attacker can now forge a request to delete your account, knowing exactly what the 'secret' anti-forgery token will be.

The CVSS score of 9.2 is justified. This vulnerability compromises the three pillars of security: Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability (if you count the eventual crash when the database constraint violations hit).

Session Hijacking: This is the marquee impact. In a worst-case scenario (e.g., a login microservice), a single hiccup in the RNG turns the application into a free-for-all.

Data Corruption: If the application uses these UUIDs as primary keys in a database, the system will start throwing constraint violations immediately. If it doesn't enforce uniqueness, you will have database rows for different users merging into one entity.

Security Middleware Bypass: Fiber's ecosystem relies heavily on these utils. The Idempotency middleware, RequestID middleware, and CSRF middleware all crumble. You lose auditing capabilities (every request has ID 00...00) and replay protection simultaneously.

The remediation path is twofold: patch the library and harden the runtime.

1. Update Fiber: You must upgrade to v2.52.11 or later. The patch forces a panic when RNG fails. A crashing app is better than a compromised one.

2. Upgrade Go: If possible, move to Go 1.24+. Newer versions of Go have improved crypto/rand implementations that are more resilient to system failures (like falling back to getrandom syscalls that don't require file descriptors on Linux).

3. Monitoring: Set up alerts for panic events in your logs. If your application starts crashing with failed to seed UUID generator, it means your infrastructure is fundamentally broken (no entropy or no FDs), and you have bigger problems to solve than just updating a library.