CVEReports
CVEReports

Automated vulnerability intelligence platform. Comprehensive reports for high-severity CVEs generated by AI.

Product

  • Home
  • Sitemap
  • RSS Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2026 CVEReports. All rights reserved.

Made with love by Amit Schendel & Alon Barad



CVE-2026-31830

CVE-2026-31830: Verification Bypass via Unchecked Return Value in sigstore-ruby

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
Software Engineer

Mar 11, 2026·6 min read·38 visits

Executive Summary (TL;DR)

A missing return value check in sigstore-ruby allows attackers to bind legitimate Sigstore signatures to malicious artifacts, achieving complete verification bypass.

sigstore-ruby prior to version 0.2.3 contains a critical logic flaw in its verification routine for DSSE bundles. An unchecked return value allows an attacker to bypass artifact binding checks, facilitating supply chain attacks via artifact swapping.

Vulnerability Overview

sigstore-ruby provides a pure Ruby implementation of the Sigstore verification protocol, enabling developers to cryptographically verify software supply chain artifacts. A critical vulnerability exists in how the library handles Dead Simple Signing Envelope (DSSE) bundles containing in-toto statements, specifically affecting SLSA attestations.

The core issue is an Unchecked Return Value (CWE-252) within the primary verification routine. When processing DSSE envelopes, the library must ensure that the cryptographic digest of the supplied artifact matches the digest specified in the subject field of the signed in-toto statement. This step binds the signature to the specific file being verified.

Due to a logic error, the library fails to propagate the result of this binding check. If the digest check fails, the library discards the failure state and proceeds with execution. This results in an integrity verification bypass, allowing an attacker to submit a malicious artifact alongside a valid, cryptographically sound bundle belonging to a different, legitimate artifact.

Technical Root Cause Analysis

The vulnerability originates in lib/sigstore/verifier.rb within the Sigstore::Verifier#verify method. When the verifier encounters a DSSE envelope with the payload type application/vnd.in-toto+json, it parses the JSON payload and delegates the artifact-to-attestation validation to a helper method named verify_in_toto.

The verify_in_toto method correctly executes its logic and returns a VerificationFailure object if the artifact's digest does not align with the subjects listed in the statement. However, the calling verify method invokes this helper without capturing or evaluating its return value.

Ruby evaluates expressions and inherently continues execution flow unless explicitly instructed to return, break, or raise an exception. Because the verify method does not inspect the returned VerificationFailure, the execution sequence advances past the validation block. The method eventually reaches its terminal success state and outputs a VerificationSuccess object.

A secondary flaw compounded the issue within the verify_in_toto implementation itself. The original logic only evaluated the first entry in the subject array and incorrectly required matches across all hash algorithms present in the statement's digest map. This structural fragility would cause false negatives for valid statements containing multiple hash types, such as both SHA-256 and SHA-512.

Code Analysis: Vulnerable vs Patched Implementation

An examination of the vulnerable code path in lib/sigstore/verifier.rb demonstrates the explicit nature of the unchecked return value. The verify_in_toto method is called as a bare expression, immediately discarding the control flow context it provides.

# Vulnerable implementation in lib/sigstore/verifier.rb
if bundle.dsse_envelope.payloadType == "application/vnd.in-toto+json"
  begin
    in_toto = JSON.parse(bundle.dsse_envelope.payload)
  rescue JSON::ParserError
    raise Error::InvalidBundle, "invalid JSON for in-toto statement in DSSE payload"
  end
  verify_in_toto(input, in_toto) # Flaw: Return value is entirely discarded
else
  # ...
end

The remediation, introduced in commit 2d7dfa262e1eab07e70d5ae5acab320f95eb597d, modifies this block to capture the result of the verify_in_toto invocation. If the helper returns a failure object (which evaluates to truthy in this context), the main verifier explicitly returns that failure.

# Patched implementation in lib/sigstore/verifier.rb
if bundle.dsse_envelope.payloadType == "application/vnd.in-toto+json"
  begin
    in_toto = JSON.parse(bundle.dsse_envelope.payload)
  rescue JSON::ParserError
    raise Error::InvalidBundle, "invalid JSON for in-toto statement in DSSE payload"
  end
  if (result = verify_in_toto(input, in_toto))
    return result # Fix: The verification failure is explicitly propagated
  end
else
  # ...
end

Additionally, the patch refactored the internal mechanics of verify_in_toto. The updated logic uses the .any? enumerable method to evaluate all provided subjects. It correctly resolves the hash algorithm dynamically from the input artifact, ensuring robust compatibility with multi-hash attestations.

Exploitation Methodology

The unchecked return value facilitates an Artifact Swapping Attack. Exploitation requires no authentication, no elevated privileges, and relies entirely on standard input processing. The attacker acts against systems performing automated supply chain validations.

The attacker first identifies a target using sigstore-ruby for verification. They download a legitimate artifact, such as legit-app.tar.gz, along with its valid, correctly signed Sigstore bundle. This bundle includes the DSSE envelope and the in-toto attestation.

Next, the attacker builds a compromised artifact, malicious-app.tar.gz, containing malicious code. They distribute this payload to the target alongside the unmodified, legitimate Sigstore bundle obtained in the previous step.

When sigstore-ruby processes this combination, it successfully validates the cryptographic signature of the DSSE envelope against the certificate chain and verifies Rekor inclusion. The library then compares the malicious artifact's digest against the legitimate statement. The mismatch generates a VerificationFailure, which the library discards. The process exits with VerificationSuccess, and the target system executes the malicious payload.

Impact and Risk Assessment

This vulnerability completely undermines the integrity guarantees provided by the Sigstore ecosystem when implemented via sigstore-ruby. The primary impact is the unchecked acceptance of maliciously altered software components.

Systems relying on this library to enforce secure supply chain policies will process trojaned binaries, tainted source code, or malicious container images as if they originated from a trusted entity. The attack leaves no cryptographic errors in the logs, as the DSSE envelope signatures themselves remain mathematically valid.

The flaw yields a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5. The attack vector is strictly network-based and requires no user interaction, making it highly suitable for automated exploitation in continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines.

Organizations utilizing affected versions face severe risk of supply chain compromise. Because the verification logic fundamentally fails to bind the signature to the payload, attackers can reuse any publicly available, valid Sigstore bundle to bypass deployment gates.

Remediation and Mitigation Strategy

The vulnerability is fully addressed in sigstore-ruby version 0.2.3. Organizations utilizing the library must update their dependencies to this version or later to restore proper integrity verification.

The applied patch comprehensively resolves the vulnerability by properly propagating the failure state up the execution stack. Analysis of the patched code confirms that the specific logic bypass is entirely closed, and no variant attacks targeting this execution path remain viable.

If immediate patching is technically prohibitive, security and development teams must implement manual validation steps. Prior to automated execution, teams should extract the in-toto JSON payload from the DSSE envelope, extract the expected SHA-256 digest from the subject array, and manually compare it against the SHA-256 digest of the downloaded artifact.

Continuous integration pipelines should enforce strict dependency pinning and monitor dependency trees for the vulnerable sigstore-ruby versions. Vulnerability scanners checking for CVE-2026-31830 will flag components prior to 0.2.3.

Fix Analysis (2)

Technical Appendix

CVSS Score
7.5/ 10
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Affected Systems

sigstore-ruby < 0.2.3Ruby applications implementing Sigstore DSSE bundle verification

Affected Versions Detail

Product
Affected Versions
Fixed Version
sigstore-ruby
sigstore
< 0.2.30.2.3
AttributeDetail
CWE IDCWE-252 (Unchecked Return Value)
Attack VectorNetwork
CVSS v3.1 Score7.5 (High)
EPSS Score0
ImpactIntegrity Bypass / Supply Chain Compromise
Exploit StatusProof-of-Concept
KEV StatusNot Listed

MITRE ATT&CK Mapping

T1190Exploit Public-Facing Application
Initial Access
CWE-252
Unchecked Return Value

The software does not check the return value from a method or function, which can prevent it from detecting unexpected states and conditions.

Vulnerability Timeline

Fix developed and merged into repository via commit 2d7dfa26
2026-03-09
GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-mhg6-2q2v-9h2c published
2026-03-10
sigstore-ruby version 0.2.3 officially released
2026-03-10
CVE-2026-31830 assigned and published
2026-03-10

References & Sources

  • [1]GitHub Security Advisory: GHSA-mhg6-2q2v-9h2c
  • [2]CVE Record: CVE-2026-31830
  • [3]NVD Record: CVE-2026-31830

Attack Flow Diagram

Press enter or space to select a node. You can then use the arrow keys to move the node around. Press delete to remove it and escape to cancel.
Press enter or space to select an edge. You can then press delete to remove it or escape to cancel.

More Reports

•about 3 hours ago•CVE-2026-54347
8.7

CVE-2026-54347: Stored Cross-Site Scripting in Froxlor DNS TXT Record Configuration

A critical stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability was identified in Froxlor server administration software panel before version 2.3.8. Authenticated customers with DNS editor privileges can inject malicious JavaScript into DNS TXT records. Because the application processes these values via a raw formatting callback without context-aware HTML entity encoding, the payload executes in the security context of administrative users who view the affected domain's DNS zones.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
3 views•6 min read
•about 4 hours ago•CVE-2026-54348
7.2

CVE-2026-54348: Second-Order SQL Injection in Froxlor API Layer

An authenticated administrator with privileges to manage admin accounts (such as change_serversettings) can execute arbitrary SQL commands via a second-order SQL injection vulnerability. The flaw resides in Froxlor's administrative API endpoints, specifically during the handling of IP address mapping parameters which are stored as serialized arrays and later interpolated without sanitization into active database queries. This vulnerability allows high-privileged administrative attackers to compromise the database. By injecting a payload into administrative profile metadata, an attacker can extract sensitive credentials, manipulate backend settings, or potentially disrupt database integrity. The vulnerability affects all versions of Froxlor prior to 2.3.8.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
3 views•6 min read
•about 5 hours ago•CVE-2026-54543
5.4

CVE-2026-54543: DNS Resource Record (RR) Injection in Froxlor DomainZones API

CVE-2026-54543 is a DNS Resource Record (RR) Injection vulnerability in Froxlor, an open-source server administration control panel. Prior to version 2.3.8, the DomainZones.add API command failed to perform strict sanitization and validation on the user-controlled record (label) and type parameters before serializing them into BIND-compatible zone files. An authenticated customer with DNS zone management permissions can inject control characters, breaking out of the original record context to define unauthorized resource records within managed zones.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
4 views•7 min read
•about 5 hours ago•CVE-2026-42533
9.2

CVE-2026-42533: NGINX Map Directive and Regex Matching Pre-Auth Heap Buffer Overflow & Info Leak

CVE-2026-42533 is a critical security vulnerability discovered in NGINX Open Source, NGINX Plus, NGINX Ingress Controller, and related products, referred to as the 'Two-Pass Capture-Clobbering' bug. The flaw is situated within NGINX's internal evaluation engine when handling complex variables, exposing a heap-based buffer overflow and information leak when a configuration chains regular expression-based map directives with numbered capture groups. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this weakness by transmitting crafted HTTP requests to trigger remote code execution or defeat ASLR.

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
7 views•7 min read
•about 6 hours ago•CVE-2026-55593
6.5

CVE-2026-55593: Persistent Administrative Hijacking via Cross-Site Request Forgery in Froxlor Ajax Router

Froxlor prior to version 2.3.8 contains a high-severity architectural flaw where the standalone lib/ajax.php entry point bypasses the centralized request validation in lib/init.php. Unauthenticated remote attackers can leverage Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) to induce authenticated administrators to submit forged requests that modify API key whitelists and expiration dates, potentially yielding persistent, out-of-band administrative control.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
4 views•8 min read
•about 7 hours ago•CVE-2026-62988
9.0

CVE-2026-62988: Multi-Factor Authentication and Credential Bypass in Froxlor API

An insecure data retrieval flaw in the Froxlor server administration panel API allows authenticated remote attackers to retrieve unredacted bcrypt password hashes and Base32-encoded Time-Based One-Time Password (TOTP) seeds. Affected endpoints include several 'get' and 'listing' handlers for customers, administrators, and FTP accounts. Utilizing these leaked parameters, attackers can crack the password hashes offline and concurrently generate valid second-factor authentication codes to completely bypass access controls.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
8 views•6 min read