CVEReports
CVEReports

Automated vulnerability intelligence platform. Comprehensive reports for high-severity CVEs generated by AI.

Product

  • Home
  • Sitemap
  • RSS Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2026 CVEReports. All rights reserved.

Made with love by Amit Schendel & Alon Barad



CVE-2026-32247

CVE-2026-32247: Cypher Injection in Graphiti via Insecure SearchFilter Interpolation

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
Software Engineer

Mar 13, 2026·5 min read·52 visits

Executive Summary (TL;DR)

A Cypher injection flaw in Graphiti < 0.28.2 allows low-privileged attackers to execute arbitrary database queries against Neo4j, FalkorDB, and Neptune backends via unsanitized search filters.

Graphiti versions prior to 0.28.2 contain a high-severity Cypher injection vulnerability (CWE-943) in the search-filter construction logic for non-Kuzu backends. This flaw permits an attacker to execute arbitrary Cypher queries against the underlying database, either directly or via indirect prompt injection in Model Context Protocol (MCP) deployments.

Vulnerability Overview

Graphiti is a temporal context graph framework used to build stateful AI agents. The framework interacts with multiple graph database backends to store and retrieve contextual data. A vulnerability exists in the query construction logic for Neo4j, FalkorDB, and Neptune backends.

The vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2026-32247, is an instance of CWE-943 (Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Data Query Logic). It specifically manifests as a Cypher injection flaw within the search-filter processing pipeline. Kuzu backends remain unaffected due to their use of parameterized queries for label handling.

Attackers with low-privileged access to the Graphiti API can leverage this flaw to execute arbitrary database queries. In deployments utilizing the Model Context Protocol (MCP), attackers can trigger the injection indirectly via malicious prompts supplied to an LLM client. The vulnerability was patched in version 0.28.2.

Root Cause Analysis

The root cause resides in the insecure string interpolation of user-supplied labels during the construction of Cypher MATCH clauses. Graphiti relies on Cypher labels to filter nodes within the graph database. Backends such as Neo4j, FalkorDB, and Neptune require structural identifiers like labels to be hardcoded into the query string rather than parameterized.

In affected versions, Graphiti extracts the node_labels list from the SearchFilters object and concatenates the elements using the pipe (|) operator. The application prepends a colon to the joined string and directly inserts the result into the query template. The application performs no validation or sanitization on the label values before this concatenation.

Because the label components are unvalidated, an attacker can input strings containing structural Cypher syntax characters. When the database parses the concatenated query string, it interprets the attacker's payload as executable Cypher commands rather than literal label values. This interpretation allows the attacker to break out of the intended MATCH clause and append arbitrary database operations.

Code Analysis

The vulnerable code pattern concatenates the node_labels list directly into the query string without validation. The application constructs a filter string and interpolates it into the MATCH statement. This implementation trusts the structural integrity of the user-supplied data.

# Vulnerable Implementation (Conceptual)
node_label_filter = 'n:' + '|'.join(filters.node_labels)
query = f"MATCH ({node_label_filter}) ... "

The patch introduced in commit 7d65d5e77e89a199a62d737634eaa26dbb04d037 replaces this insecure interpolation with strict input validation. The developers implemented a regex pattern to enforce a restrictive whitelist on all label and group ID values. This regex strictly limits inputs to alphanumeric characters and underscores.

# Patched Implementation Helper
SAFE_CYPHER_IDENTIFIER_PATTERN = re.compile(r'^[A-Za-z_][A-Za-z0-9_]*$')

The patch applies this regex via Pydantic validators on the Node and SearchFilters models. The validation logic ensures that all user-supplied labels start with a letter or underscore. The developers also updated the node_search_filter_query_constructor and persistence layers to explicitly call these validation helpers, preventing bypasses via direct model construction.

Exploitation

Exploiting CVE-2026-32247 requires the attacker to supply a crafted payload via the node_labels parameter. An attacker can authenticate to the Graphiti API directly and submit the payload within a standard search request. A more complex vector involves indirect prompt injection in Model Context Protocol (MCP) environments.

An attacker provides a malicious prompt to an LLM that is configured to use the Graphiti MCP server as a tool. The prompt instructs the LLM to invoke the search_nodes tool with the payload embedded in the entity_types argument. Graphiti maps the entity_types argument directly to the vulnerable node_labels field.

A standard payload takes the form of Person) DETACH DELETE n RETURN n //. Upon execution, the database engine processes the payload, closing the parenthesis to break out of the original MATCH context. The DETACH DELETE command executes immediately after, effectively destroying all nodes and relationships within the target graph database.

Impact Assessment

The vulnerability carries a CVSS 3.1 base score of 8.1, reflecting a high-severity threat to data confidentiality and integrity. Successful exploitation allows complete control over the underlying graph database. An attacker can read arbitrary data by appending MATCH and RETURN clauses to the injected query.

Data integrity is equally compromised. Attackers can modify existing nodes, forge temporal events, or delete the entire dataset using the DETACH DELETE operation. The application's availability is technically unaffected at the system configuration level, although data destruction effectively halts application functionality.

The vulnerability does not grant direct operating system access or remote code execution on the host machine. The execution context is strictly confined to the database service account permissions. Organizations using vulnerable versions expose their complete temporal context history to total compromise.

Remediation

The primary remediation for CVE-2026-32247 is upgrading to Graphiti version 0.28.2. This release contains the complete regex-based validation patch across all model constructors and persistence layers. Organizations utilizing Graphiti should deploy this update immediately across all environments.

Administrators should enforce the principle of least privilege on the database service accounts used by Graphiti. Restricting the database user from executing destructive commands like DETACH DELETE limits the impact of successful injections. This backend configuration serves as a critical defense-in-depth measure.

In MCP environments, security teams must treat all LLM outputs as untrusted input. Implementing an intermediary validation layer between the LLM client and the Graphiti server provides additional protection against indirect prompt injection vectors. Monitoring tool-calling behavior for anomalous payload structures aids in detecting exploitation attempts.

Official Patches

Zep SoftwareGitHub Security Advisory GHSA-gg5m-55jj-8m5g
Zep SoftwarePull Request containing the fix
Zep SoftwareRelease notes for version 0.28.2

Fix Analysis (1)

Technical Appendix

CVSS Score
8.1/ 10
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Affected Systems

Graphiti API componentsGraphiti MCP ServerNeo4j Backend DeploymentsFalkorDB Backend DeploymentsNeptune Backend Deployments

Affected Versions Detail

Product
Affected Versions
Fixed Version
getzep/graphiti
Zep Software
< 0.28.20.28.2
AttributeDetail
CWE IDCWE-943
Attack VectorNetwork
CVSS Score8.1 (High)
ImpactHigh Confidentiality, High Integrity
Exploit StatusPoC Available
CISA KEV StatusNot Listed

MITRE ATT&CK Mapping

T1190Exploit Public-Facing Application
Initial Access
T1565.001Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation
Impact
CWE-943
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Data Query Logic

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Data Query Logic

Known Exploits & Detection

Regression Test PoCPoC payloads demonstrating breakout and execution of DETACH DELETE via unvalidated labels.

Vulnerability Timeline

Fix commit merged to main branch.
2026-03-11
Security advisory published and CVE assigned.
2026-03-12

References & Sources

  • [1]GHSA-gg5m-55jj-8m5g: Cypher Injection in Graphiti
  • [2]Fix Commit 7d65d5e77e89a199a62d737634eaa26dbb04d037
  • [3]Pull Request 1312
  • [4]Graphiti Release v0.28.2

Attack Flow Diagram

Press enter or space to select a node. You can then use the arrow keys to move the node around. Press delete to remove it and escape to cancel.
Press enter or space to select an edge. You can then press delete to remove it or escape to cancel.

More Reports

•about 16 hours ago•CVE-2026-115895
8.8

CVE-2026-115895: Code Injection via Unsanitized Import Alias in Happy DOM ECMAScript Module Compiler

CVE-2026-115895 is a high-severity code injection vulnerability (CWE-94) in the happy-dom npm package prior to version 21.0.4. The vulnerability exists within the ECMAScriptModuleCompiler component, which transforms ECMAScript module syntax into executable Node.js functions when JavaScript evaluation is enabled. Due to an incomplete fix for CVE-2026-33943, the compiler failed to validate local named import aliases against legal JavaScript identifier rules. Attackers supplying crafted module imports—specifically utilizing destructuring default initializers alongside JSON module attributes—can inject arbitrary JavaScript expressions directly into the host Node.js runtime context.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
7 views•10 min read
•about 17 hours ago•CVE-2026-115883
6.0

CVE-2026-115883: Cross-Namespace Access via Dot-Delimited Labels in LangGraph Postgres and SQLite Stores

An improper input validation and authorization bypass vulnerability exists in the LangGraph storage layer affecting langgraph, langgraph-checkpoint-postgres, and langgraph-checkpoint-sqlite. Because relational store implementations serialize namespace tuples into dot-delimited strings without validating labels on read, search, delete, and batch operations, an attacker who controls a namespace label can inject periods (.) to traverse namespace boundaries and access, modify, or delete data belonging to other namespaces.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
8 views•9 min read
•about 18 hours ago•CVE-2026-115886
6.5

CVE-2026-115886: Unauthenticated Server-Side Request Forgery and Unsafe Reflection in MLflow Scorer Evaluation Endpoints

CVE-2026-115886 (GHSA-2wqp-q3c6-ccj5) is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) and Unsafe Reflection vulnerability in MLflow versions 3.12.0rc0 prior to 3.17.0. Unauthenticated REST API endpoints accept serialized third-party scorer JSON payloads that are dynamically deserialized and reflectively instantiated without sanitizing constructor keyword arguments. When optional dependencies such as trulens and trulens-providers-litellm are installed, attackers can inject egress-steering arguments into the scorer payload, forcing the MLflow server to dispatch outbound HTTP requests to arbitrary internal destinations or cloud metadata services.

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
9 views•10 min read
•about 19 hours ago•CVE-2026-113872
7.5

CVE-2026-113872: Unauthenticated Process Crash in Express Multer via Late Busboy Stream Resumption

CVE-2026-113872 (GHSA-q7qp-rjg7-q26m) is a high-severity denial-of-service vulnerability affecting the multer multipart/form-data upload middleware for Node.js and Express in versions 2.0.0 through 2.4.0. When an endpoint is configured to accept multiple files using an asynchronous fileFilter callback, a crafted, truncated multipart HTTP request can trigger an unhandled error event on the underlying busboy stream parser after request teardown has already completed. Because all error listeners are stripped during teardown, Node.js treats the resulting error event as an uncaught exception and immediately terminates the server process.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
7 views•12 min read
•about 20 hours ago•CVE-2026-115897
2.1

CVE-2026-115897: Cross-Site Scripting via Function Body Boundary Bypass in serialize-javascript

CVE-2026-115897 (also tracked as GHSA-m5mm-p8h7-m29v and aliased as CVE-2026-115754) is a Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Yahoo serialize-javascript npm package prior to version 7.1.3. The flaw exists in the regular expression used by escapeFunctionBody() to neutralize HTML script closing tags within serialized JavaScript functions. Because function bodies are sanitized in isolation before structural formatting is applied, a function whose string representation terminates directly with the sequence '</script' bypasses the positive lookahead check. When combined with serialization formatting options that introduce whitespace delimiters and a subsequent property that supplies a closing bracket, an attacker can prematurely terminate an enclosing HTML <script> block and inject arbitrary HTML or JavaScript into the rendered document.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
7 views•13 min read
•about 21 hours ago•CVE-2026-109841
5.9

CVE-2026-109841: Subresource Integrity Verification Bypass in Node.js Undici

CVE-2026-109841 is a Subresource Integrity (SRI) verification bypass vulnerability in undici, the official HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2 client library for Node.js that powers the global fetch() implementation. The flaw stems from improper handling of case sensitivity (CWE-178) when validating cryptographic hash algorithm tokens within SRI metadata. Because undici compared incoming algorithm identifiers against a strictly lowercase set without prior ASCII-lowercase normalization, valid uppercase or mixed-case tokens such as SHA256- or Sha384- were treated as unrecognized algorithms and discarded. Under SRI forward-compatibility rules, discarding all provided tokens results in an empty integrity list, causing undici to fail open and accept tampered HTTP response bodies without cryptographic verification.

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
10 views•9 min read