CVEReports
CVEReports

Automated vulnerability intelligence platform. Comprehensive reports for high-severity CVEs generated by AI.

Product

  • Home
  • Sitemap
  • RSS Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2026 CVEReports. All rights reserved.

Made with love by Amit Schendel & Alon Barad



CVE-2026-34225

CVE-2026-34225: Blind Server-Side Request Forgery in Open WebUI Image Edit Endpoint

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
Senior Security Researcher

Jul 7, 2026·6 min read·101 visits

Executive Summary (TL;DR)

Authenticated users can exploit a blind SSRF vulnerability in Open WebUI versions 0.7.2 and below via the image-edit endpoint. This allows scanning of the local address space, port discovery, and interaction with internal endpoints such as local databases or cloud metadata services.

Open WebUI versions 0.7.2 and below contain a blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. The flaw exists within the image editing router, specifically inside the /api/v1/images/edit endpoint. An authenticated attacker with low privileges can exploit this endpoint to initiate asynchronous HTTP GET requests to local, private, or internal network services, mapping system resources and bypassing boundary restrictions.

Vulnerability Overview

Open WebUI is an offline-capable, self-hosted user interface designed for interacting with local and remote artificial intelligence models. To enhance user interaction, the platform features multiple utility routers, including an image processing service. The image processing router exposes endpoints that support uploading, downloading, and editing user-provided images alongside prompt directives.

A technical assessment revealed a blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the /api/v1/images/edit endpoint. When an authenticated, low-privileged user submits a request to modify an image, they can supply an arbitrary HTTP or HTTPS URL as the image source. The server attempts to retrieve the image resource directly from the user-specified host.

Because the backend does not enforce destination access controls, resolving hostnames are permitted to target internal network interfaces. This includes loopback addresses, local private subnets (RFC 1918), and link-local structures. This analysis describes the root cause, exploitation methodology, and complete mitigation path.

Root Cause Analysis

The underlying defect resides in how the image retrieval routine validates target strings. In the vulnerable application state, the image_edits router handles POST requests by reading parameters through an EditImageForm schema. The image property accepts either base64-encoded binary data or a standard URI string.

When a URI is identified, the backend invokes a nested asynchronous function named load_url_image(data). This function is designed to check if the input data begins with standard web protocol prefixes, specifically http:// or https://. Once confirmed, the endpoint executes an unconditional HTTP GET request to fetch the image.

The system fails to validate the resolved IP address of the target destination prior to connection initiation. Standard DNS resolution is performed dynamically during the client connection lifecycle. This permits the resolution of loopback ranges, such as 127.0.0.1, and cloud infrastructure endpoints, such as the 169.254.169.254 metadata address.

Furthermore, the endpoint handles connection errors by propagating raw exception text back to the client. When a targeted local port is closed, the connection attempt is rejected instantly, triggering a database or driver error. When a port is open but non-responsive, the system eventually times out. These distinct response patterns allow an attacker to perform reliable port scanning of host network services.

Code-Level Analysis

The vulnerable code path is located in backend/open_webui/routers/images.py inside the nested load_url_image utility function. The implementation lacks destination checks and executes standard synchronous HTTP transactions wrapped inside an asynchronous executor.

# Vulnerable code structure in backend/open_webui/routers/images.py
async def load_url_image(data):
    if data.startswith("data:"):
        return data
 
    # The function only verifies the schema prefix
    if data.startswith("http://") or data.startswith("https://"):
        # Synchronous requests call executed unconditionally within a thread
        r = await asyncio.to_thread(requests.get, data)
        r.raise_for_status()
 
        image_data = base64.b64encode(r.content).decode("utf-8")
        return f"data:{r.headers['content-type']};base64,{image_data}"

The patched implementation mitigates this by routing connections through a dedicated verification step prior to launching the network transaction. It invokes validate_url(data) to block loopback and private subnets, and introduces an SSRF-safe session handler.

# Patched secure implementation in backend/open_webui/routers/images.py
async def load_url_image(data):
    if data.startswith('data:'):
        return data
 
    if data.startswith('http://') or data.startswith('https://'):
        # Pre-resolve and validate destination host against blacklisted subnets
        await asyncio.to_thread(validate_url, data)
        
        # Enforce connect-time verification preventing DNS rebinding and redirection attacks
        async with get_ssrf_safe_session() as session:
            async with session.get(
                data, ssl=AIOHTTP_CLIENT_SESSION_SSL, allow_redirects=AIOHTTP_CLIENT_ALLOW_REDIRECTS
            ) as r: 
                r.raise_for_status()
 
                image_data = base64.b64encode(await r.read()).decode('utf-8')
                return f'data:{r.headers["content-type"]};base64,{image_data}'

In the secure version, the validate_url helper prevents standard private ranges from being requested. Furthermore, get_ssrf_safe_session leverages custom socket resolution policies. This guarantees that even if a DNS entry is updated during connection establishment (DNS rebinding), the resulting IP is re-evaluated before any bytes are transmitted.

Attack Methodology and Exploitation

To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must first obtain verified credentials for the Open WebUI instance. Once authenticated, the attacker extracts the Bearer token to authorize API requests. The attacker targets the /api/v1/images/edit endpoint, crafting an payload that specifies a local network target.

By systematically incrementing the port number or IP address in the image parameter, the attacker maps the local environment. When a connection is attempted to a closed local port, the endpoint returns an HTTP 400 response indicating a connection failure. When the target port is open, the connection succeeds or times out based on service response behavior, enabling detailed network fingerprinting.

The following curl request demonstrates how an attacker initiates a port-scan probe targeting a local service on port 8080:

curl -X POST http://localhost:3000/api/v1/images/edit \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer <token>" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"form_data": {
    "image": "http://127.0.0.1:8080/",
    "prompt": "security-poc"}
  }'

> [!NOTE] > The raw exception messages returned inside the JSON response help the attacker distinguish between active, closed, and firewalled endpoints without triggering deep host security alerts.

Impact and Exposure Assessment

The CVSS score for this vulnerability is assessed at 4.3 (Medium). Because the SSRF is blind, the attacker cannot read full raw responses from the internal services directly. However, the impact is significant when Open WebUI is co-located with sensitive, unauthenticated administrative tools.

In cloud deployments (such as AWS, GCP, or Azure), an attacker can target the Instance Metadata Service (IMDS). Under IMDSv1, requesting metadata endpoints requires no extra headers, allowing the attacker to retrieve sensitive configuration data, environment parameters, and temporary credentials.

In local environments, Open WebUI often runs adjacent to local container APIs or database instances like Ollama or Redis. An attacker can leverage this SSRF to execute unauthenticated commands, trigger container interactions, or deplete resources on internal database instances, widening the attack surface beyond the original container boundaries.

Remediation and Mitigation Guidance

The primary remediation strategy is upgrading the Open WebUI instance to version 0.7.3 or later. This release enforces validation of all resolved IP addresses, blocking links targeting private IP addresses (RFC 1918) and link-local subnets before socket connection.

If upgrading is not immediately possible, administrators can mitigate the risk by modifying network configuration parameters. Setting the ENABLE_IMAGE_EDIT environment variable to False disables the affected endpoint completely, removing the attack surface.

Additionally, administrators can implement strict egress firewall policies on the Open WebUI container. Configuring rules to block outbound traffic from the container to private IP ranges and loopback interfaces protects internal infrastructure from SSRF exploitation.

Fix Analysis (1)

Technical Appendix

CVSS Score
4.3/ 10
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Affected Systems

Open WebUI (open-webui/open-webui)

Affected Versions Detail

Product
Affected Versions
Fixed Version
Open WebUI
open-webui
<= 0.7.20.7.3
AttributeDetail
CWE IDCWE-918
Attack VectorNetwork (AV:N)
CVSS Score4.3 (Medium)
Exploit StatusProof of Concept (PoC) Available
KEV StatusNot Listed
ImpactLow (Confidentiality)
Privileges RequiredLow (PR:L)

MITRE ATT&CK Mapping

T1190Exploit Public-Facing Application
Initial Access
T1005Data from Local System
Collection
CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

The web application server sends a request to an arbitrary destination provided by an untrusted user, bypasses access controls, or reaches internal systems.

Known Exploits & Detection

GitHub Security AdvisoryGHSA-jgx9-jr5x-mvpv: Blind Server-Side Request Forgery in Image Edit Functionality

Vulnerability Timeline

Security Advisory GHSA-jgx9-jr5x-mvpv Published
2026-02-25
CVE-2026-34225 Assigned and Published to NVD
2026-02-25
Official Patch Committed and Evaluated
2026-02-26

References & Sources

  • [1]GitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-jgx9-jr5x-mvpv)
  • [2]NVD CVE Record (CVE-2026-34225)
  • [3]Primary Source Code Repository
  • [4]Authoritative CVE Registry

Attack Flow Diagram

Press enter or space to select a node. You can then use the arrow keys to move the node around. Press delete to remove it and escape to cancel.
Press enter or space to select an edge. You can then press delete to remove it or escape to cancel.

More Reports

•about 5 hours ago•CVE-2026-88779
8.7

CVE-2026-88779: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer in Citrix NetScaler SAML Authentication Daemon

CVE-2026-88779 is a critical vulnerability in Citrix NetScaler ADC and Citrix NetScaler Gateway affecting systems configured as a SAML Service Provider (SP) or SAML Identity Provider (IdP). An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability to trigger a buffer overflow in the authentication daemon, resulting in persistent denial of service and appliance crash loops.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
22 views•6 min read
•2 days ago•GHSA-9Q4R-4842-93VW
7.7

GHSA-9Q4R-4842-93VW: Cross-Tenant SQL Injection in Trigger.dev TSQL Query Compiler

A critical cross-tenant SQL injection vulnerability exists in the TSQL query compiler of Trigger.dev, allowing authenticated users to bypass tenant isolation boundaries and read arbitrary ClickHouse analytics logs and execution payloads belonging to other organizations.

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
9 views•6 min read
•2 days ago•GHSA-4672-HWV6-GQ62
5.4

GHSA-4672-HWV6-GQ62: Cross-environment deployment cancellation in Trigger.dev

A logical authorization bypass vulnerability exists in Trigger.dev versions prior to 4.5.6. This flaw allows an authenticated client with a low-trust environment API key, such as development or staging, to cancel active worker deployments in a higher-trust environment like production within the same project. The vulnerability occurs because write operations on deployments were scoped solely by project identifier instead of environment identifier.

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
6 views•6 min read
•2 days ago•GHSA-JQMF-MX4F-HFR6
10.0

GHSA-JQMF-MX4F-HFR6: Multiple Remote Code Execution and Security Flaws in Vibe-Trading AI-Agent Pipeline

An in-depth technical analysis of multiple critical security flaws identified in the Vibe-Trading ecosystem (vibe-trading-ai). These issues range from unauthenticated remote command injection via agent tool executions to arbitrary Python execution through dynamic module loading and unsafe Jinja2 template autoescaping, allowing full system compromise.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
16 views•7 min read
•2 days ago•GHSA-5RMQ-CHC7-M22F
7.5

GHSA-5RMQ-CHC7-M22F: Arbitrary File Read and Path Traversal in Vibe-Trading Platform

An arbitrary file read and path traversal vulnerability in the Vibe-Trading platform allows unauthenticated remote attackers to retrieve sensitive configuration files, API keys, and system secrets. The flaw stems from permissive directory checking in path validation tools and a complete lack of input sanitization in the document reader utility. Remediation was introduced in version 0.1.7 by implementing strict path allowlists, forcing user authentication, and dropping root execution privileges within the container environment.

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
8 views•6 min read
•2 days ago•GHSA-V2F8-6655-7GRJ
10.0

GHSA-v2f8-6655-7grj: Remote Code Execution and Authentication Bypass in vibe-trading-ai

The vibe-trading-ai package prior to version 0.1.7 contains multiple critical security vulnerabilities including unauthenticated remote code execution (RCE) via session message injection, missing authentication on read endpoints, unrestricted file upload, insecure CORS policies, and sensitive key disclosure. Because the application default settings failed open, ran as root within Docker, and bound to all interfaces, remote unauthenticated attackers could compromise host environments containing sensitive trading data.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
11 views•6 min read