Jul 6, 2026·6 min read·112 visits
A critical-severity unrestricted file upload vulnerability in Adobe ColdFusion allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary system commands via crafted web scripts.
Adobe ColdFusion versions 2025.9 and 2023.20 and earlier are affected by an Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type vulnerability (CWE-434). An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this flaw to upload malicious ColdFusion Markup Language (CFML) files directly into web-accessible directories. Accessing the uploaded script triggers arbitrary code execution in the security context of the running service account.
Adobe ColdFusion is an enterprise-grade web application server framework designed for processing dynamic templates and backend business logic using ColdFusion Markup Language (CFML). The core engine parses dynamic server-side scripts and executes them within a Java Virtual Machine (JVM) environment. Because the platform natively handles file storage and administration routing, secure validation of dynamic assets is critical to isolation boundaries.
In June 2026, Adobe disclosed CVE-2026-48276, a critical file upload vulnerability in the platform's standard configuration. The issue stems from a failure to validate file types on public-facing or administration endpoints. Unauthenticated remote attackers can utilize this administrative mapping to write arbitrary files directly to system storage.
Because the host environment maps files with specific extensions to the internal CFML and Java Server Pages (JSP) servlet handlers, the presence of these files in web-exposed directories presents a massive security exposure. This vulnerability bypasses all perimeter authorization checks, offering a direct vector to system compromise.
The technical root cause of CVE-2026-48276 lies in the omission of extension allowlisting within ColdFusion's standard file ingestion endpoints. Secure web engineering mandates that any file-upload utility must either store incoming files in a non-executable directory outside of the document root, or validate filenames against a strict allowlist of benign extensions. The vulnerable components of ColdFusion fail to enforce both of these defensive practices.
Under default deployment settings, the target application accepts file streams via multipart form-data requests and writes them to directories nested within the web server's application root. The validation logic does not neutralize executable tags or verify whether file extensions such as .cfm, .cfc, or .jsp are being injected. This design choice leaves the engine open to structured directory contamination.
Once the file is written to the target path, the application relies on standard IIS or Apache handler mappings to resolve requests. Because the server processes these directories as web-executable paths, any direct HTTP request matching the location of the uploaded payload forces the servlet container to interpret the script. The engine processes the attacker's server-side logic, executing commands within the system memory space.
Because Adobe ColdFusion is proprietary software, exact class-level modifications are confined to compiled Java bytecode within patch updates. The vulnerable architecture can be conceptualized by looking at typical file upload wrappers that accept stream parameters without strict sanitation controls. The code blocks below contrast a vulnerable routing approach with a secure, patched validation process.
// Conceptual representation of vulnerable file handling
public void handleUpload(HttpServletRequest request) {
String filename = request.getParameter("filename"); // Unvalidated file name from user input
File destination = new File(webRoot + "/uploads/" + filename);
// CRITICAL BUG: No check on file extension or target location
Files.copy(request.getInputStream(), destination.toPath(), StandardCopyOption.REPLACE_EXISTING);
}// Conceptual representation of patched file handling
public void handleUploadPatched(HttpServletRequest request) {
String filename = sanitizeFilename(request.getParameter("filename"));
String extension = getFileExtension(filename);
// PATCH: Strict allowlist validation of safe extensions
if (!SAFE_EXTENSIONS.contains(extension.toLowerCase())) {
throw new SecurityException("Forbidden file extension detected");
}
// PATCH: Store files completely outside of the web-accessible document root
File destination = new File(secureStorageDir + "/" + filename);
Files.copy(request.getInputStream(), destination.toPath(), StandardCopyOption.REPLACE_EXISTING);
}In the patched version, the application sanitizes the client-side filename input to eliminate path traversal characters and enforces check rules against an allowlist. Storing the uploaded file in a secure directory outside the document root ensures that external web clients cannot trigger execution, completely neutralizing the primary injection vector.
Exploiting this vulnerability does not require any authentication, special administrative privileges, or user interaction. An attacker first maps out a target ColdFusion server using standard port scanning and service detection to verify the version in use. Once a vulnerable system is identified, the exploitation flow is purely programmatic.
The attacker crafts a multipart HTTP POST request containing a malicious CFML payload designed to execute system-level utilities via native tags such as <cfexecute>. The request is directed to the vulnerable upload endpoint. If successful, the server responds with a confirmation, writing the web shell to the server's storage path.
To complete execution, the attacker sends a standard HTTP GET request targeting the newly written script file. The ColdFusion servlet processor reads the file, parses the CFML tags, and runs the command payload. This sequence grants the attacker an interactive shell directly inside the enterprise environment, as illustrated in the following sequence:
The impact of CVE-2026-48276 is rated as critical, receiving a maximum CVSS base score of 10.0. The exploit scope is designated as changed, which indicates that exploitation compromises boundaries extending beyond the ColdFusion sandbox. It leads directly to code execution in the security context of the parent operating system.
Since many default ColdFusion installations execute under highly privileged local accounts such as NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM on Windows or root on Linux, the attacker effectively gains full control of the host. The compromise allows attackers to read database credentials, harvest system memory, install persistence modules, and exfiltrate database records.
From an operational standpoint, this vulnerability serves as an initial access vector that facilitates lateral movement. Attackers can leverage the compromised application server to scan internal networks, bypass firewall configurations, or distribute ransomware payloads across corporate active directory domains.
The primary remediation for this vulnerability is applying the official software updates provided by Adobe. These patches modify the default file-ingestion servlet pipelines to implement strict allowlist checks and prevent file creation in vulnerable directories. Administrators must verify version statuses and schedule immediate maintenance windows.
For systems running the ColdFusion 2025 branch, administrators must upgrade to ColdFusion 2025 Update 10 or later. For systems on the ColdFusion 2023 branch, deployments must be upgraded to ColdFusion 2023 Update 21 or later. Applying these hotfixes resolves the root validation failure.
Temporary workarounds include deploying robust Web Application Firewall (WAF) rules to detect and drop multipart HTTP requests containing CFML syntax directed at administration interfaces. Additionally, administrators should configure IIS or Apache web handlers to specifically deny execution permissions in directories designated for file storage, such as the temporary upload folders.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H| Attribute | Detail |
|---|---|
| CWE ID | CWE-434 |
| Attack Vector | Network (AV:N) |
| CVSS Score | 10.0 (Critical) |
| Exploit Status | No public exploits currently documented |
| KEV Status | Not listed in CISA KEV catalog |
| Impact | Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution |
The software allows the attacker to upload or transfer files of dangerous types that can be executed within the product's environment.
SurrealDB versions supporting element-level SELECT permissions on arrays are vulnerable to a logical authorization bypass. Due to an index-shifting error during array filtration, restricted elements can skip permission checks and leak to unauthorized record users.
CVE-2026-12243 is a path traversal vulnerability in the Natural Language Toolkit (NLTK) version 3.9.4. The flaw exists because the input validation routine fails to account for percent-encoded directory traversal sequences like '..%2f' before passing them to urllib.request.url2pathname(), which decodes them into active traversal sequences.
CVE-2026-73654 is a high-severity prototype pollution vulnerability in Trigger.dev. The flaw occurs during the handling of run-metadata updates through the PUT /api/v1/runs/:runId/metadata endpoint. Because user-supplied keys are parsed directly by the @jsonhero/path library without sanitization, an authenticated attacker with low privileges can pollute the global Object.prototype. This causes database queries via Prisma ORM to fail validation and induces unhandled exceptions in the Prometheus metrics client, resulting in a process-wide denial of service.
CVE-2026-73559 is an uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability in the vLLM engine, specifically within the /v1/completions API endpoint, allowing authenticated attackers to cause application-level denial of service via unbounded prompt arrays.
A critical security bypass vulnerability in Argo Workflows allows authenticated attackers with workflow submission privileges to bypass 'Strict' or 'Secure' template referencing restrictions. By injecting unvalidated fields into the nested ArtifactGC configuration, attackers can execute arbitrary pod patches, leading to host namespace escape and cluster-wide privilege escalation.
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) / Confused Deputy vulnerability has been identified in Pydantic AI UI Adapters (such as VercelAIAdapter). Under certain conditions, a malicious client can supply manipulated message history with provider metadata that forces the server to resolve files within privileged cloud environments (AWS S3, Google Cloud Storage) or model providers. This occurs because the adapters deserialize client-provided metadata structures directly into UploadedFile instances without validation, which are subsequently fetched using high-privilege server credentials.