Jul 6, 2026·6 min read·170 visits
A critical-severity unrestricted file upload vulnerability in Adobe ColdFusion allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary system commands via crafted web scripts.
Adobe ColdFusion versions 2025.9 and 2023.20 and earlier are affected by an Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type vulnerability (CWE-434). An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this flaw to upload malicious ColdFusion Markup Language (CFML) files directly into web-accessible directories. Accessing the uploaded script triggers arbitrary code execution in the security context of the running service account.
Adobe ColdFusion is an enterprise-grade web application server framework designed for processing dynamic templates and backend business logic using ColdFusion Markup Language (CFML). The core engine parses dynamic server-side scripts and executes them within a Java Virtual Machine (JVM) environment. Because the platform natively handles file storage and administration routing, secure validation of dynamic assets is critical to isolation boundaries.
In June 2026, Adobe disclosed CVE-2026-48276, a critical file upload vulnerability in the platform's standard configuration. The issue stems from a failure to validate file types on public-facing or administration endpoints. Unauthenticated remote attackers can utilize this administrative mapping to write arbitrary files directly to system storage.
Because the host environment maps files with specific extensions to the internal CFML and Java Server Pages (JSP) servlet handlers, the presence of these files in web-exposed directories presents a massive security exposure. This vulnerability bypasses all perimeter authorization checks, offering a direct vector to system compromise.
The technical root cause of CVE-2026-48276 lies in the omission of extension allowlisting within ColdFusion's standard file ingestion endpoints. Secure web engineering mandates that any file-upload utility must either store incoming files in a non-executable directory outside of the document root, or validate filenames against a strict allowlist of benign extensions. The vulnerable components of ColdFusion fail to enforce both of these defensive practices.
Under default deployment settings, the target application accepts file streams via multipart form-data requests and writes them to directories nested within the web server's application root. The validation logic does not neutralize executable tags or verify whether file extensions such as .cfm, .cfc, or .jsp are being injected. This design choice leaves the engine open to structured directory contamination.
Once the file is written to the target path, the application relies on standard IIS or Apache handler mappings to resolve requests. Because the server processes these directories as web-executable paths, any direct HTTP request matching the location of the uploaded payload forces the servlet container to interpret the script. The engine processes the attacker's server-side logic, executing commands within the system memory space.
Because Adobe ColdFusion is proprietary software, exact class-level modifications are confined to compiled Java bytecode within patch updates. The vulnerable architecture can be conceptualized by looking at typical file upload wrappers that accept stream parameters without strict sanitation controls. The code blocks below contrast a vulnerable routing approach with a secure, patched validation process.
// Conceptual representation of vulnerable file handling
public void handleUpload(HttpServletRequest request) {
String filename = request.getParameter("filename"); // Unvalidated file name from user input
File destination = new File(webRoot + "/uploads/" + filename);
// CRITICAL BUG: No check on file extension or target location
Files.copy(request.getInputStream(), destination.toPath(), StandardCopyOption.REPLACE_EXISTING);
}// Conceptual representation of patched file handling
public void handleUploadPatched(HttpServletRequest request) {
String filename = sanitizeFilename(request.getParameter("filename"));
String extension = getFileExtension(filename);
// PATCH: Strict allowlist validation of safe extensions
if (!SAFE_EXTENSIONS.contains(extension.toLowerCase())) {
throw new SecurityException("Forbidden file extension detected");
}
// PATCH: Store files completely outside of the web-accessible document root
File destination = new File(secureStorageDir + "/" + filename);
Files.copy(request.getInputStream(), destination.toPath(), StandardCopyOption.REPLACE_EXISTING);
}In the patched version, the application sanitizes the client-side filename input to eliminate path traversal characters and enforces check rules against an allowlist. Storing the uploaded file in a secure directory outside the document root ensures that external web clients cannot trigger execution, completely neutralizing the primary injection vector.
Exploiting this vulnerability does not require any authentication, special administrative privileges, or user interaction. An attacker first maps out a target ColdFusion server using standard port scanning and service detection to verify the version in use. Once a vulnerable system is identified, the exploitation flow is purely programmatic.
The attacker crafts a multipart HTTP POST request containing a malicious CFML payload designed to execute system-level utilities via native tags such as <cfexecute>. The request is directed to the vulnerable upload endpoint. If successful, the server responds with a confirmation, writing the web shell to the server's storage path.
To complete execution, the attacker sends a standard HTTP GET request targeting the newly written script file. The ColdFusion servlet processor reads the file, parses the CFML tags, and runs the command payload. This sequence grants the attacker an interactive shell directly inside the enterprise environment, as illustrated in the following sequence:
The impact of CVE-2026-48276 is rated as critical, receiving a maximum CVSS base score of 10.0. The exploit scope is designated as changed, which indicates that exploitation compromises boundaries extending beyond the ColdFusion sandbox. It leads directly to code execution in the security context of the parent operating system.
Since many default ColdFusion installations execute under highly privileged local accounts such as NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM on Windows or root on Linux, the attacker effectively gains full control of the host. The compromise allows attackers to read database credentials, harvest system memory, install persistence modules, and exfiltrate database records.
From an operational standpoint, this vulnerability serves as an initial access vector that facilitates lateral movement. Attackers can leverage the compromised application server to scan internal networks, bypass firewall configurations, or distribute ransomware payloads across corporate active directory domains.
The primary remediation for this vulnerability is applying the official software updates provided by Adobe. These patches modify the default file-ingestion servlet pipelines to implement strict allowlist checks and prevent file creation in vulnerable directories. Administrators must verify version statuses and schedule immediate maintenance windows.
For systems running the ColdFusion 2025 branch, administrators must upgrade to ColdFusion 2025 Update 10 or later. For systems on the ColdFusion 2023 branch, deployments must be upgraded to ColdFusion 2023 Update 21 or later. Applying these hotfixes resolves the root validation failure.
Temporary workarounds include deploying robust Web Application Firewall (WAF) rules to detect and drop multipart HTTP requests containing CFML syntax directed at administration interfaces. Additionally, administrators should configure IIS or Apache web handlers to specifically deny execution permissions in directories designated for file storage, such as the temporary upload folders.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H| Attribute | Detail |
|---|---|
| CWE ID | CWE-434 |
| Attack Vector | Network (AV:N) |
| CVSS Score | 10.0 (Critical) |
| Exploit Status | No public exploits currently documented |
| KEV Status | Not listed in CISA KEV catalog |
| Impact | Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution |
The software allows the attacker to upload or transfer files of dangerous types that can be executed within the product's environment.
A critical cross-tenant SQL injection vulnerability exists in the TSQL query compiler of Trigger.dev, allowing authenticated users to bypass tenant isolation boundaries and read arbitrary ClickHouse analytics logs and execution payloads belonging to other organizations.
A logical authorization bypass vulnerability exists in Trigger.dev versions prior to 4.5.6. This flaw allows an authenticated client with a low-trust environment API key, such as development or staging, to cancel active worker deployments in a higher-trust environment like production within the same project. The vulnerability occurs because write operations on deployments were scoped solely by project identifier instead of environment identifier.
An in-depth technical analysis of multiple critical security flaws identified in the Vibe-Trading ecosystem (vibe-trading-ai). These issues range from unauthenticated remote command injection via agent tool executions to arbitrary Python execution through dynamic module loading and unsafe Jinja2 template autoescaping, allowing full system compromise.
An arbitrary file read and path traversal vulnerability in the Vibe-Trading platform allows unauthenticated remote attackers to retrieve sensitive configuration files, API keys, and system secrets. The flaw stems from permissive directory checking in path validation tools and a complete lack of input sanitization in the document reader utility. Remediation was introduced in version 0.1.7 by implementing strict path allowlists, forcing user authentication, and dropping root execution privileges within the container environment.
The vibe-trading-ai package prior to version 0.1.7 contains multiple critical security vulnerabilities including unauthenticated remote code execution (RCE) via session message injection, missing authentication on read endpoints, unrestricted file upload, insecure CORS policies, and sensitive key disclosure. Because the application default settings failed open, ran as root within Docker, and bound to all interfaces, remote unauthenticated attackers could compromise host environments containing sensitive trading data.
CVE-2026-18140 is a denial-of-service vulnerability in the Amazon aws-smithy-json Rust crate. Under-validation of recursion depth within the unknown-key skipping path allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to cause stack exhaustion and process aborts by sending deeply nested JSON arrays.