CVEReports
CVEReports

Automated vulnerability intelligence platform. Comprehensive reports for high-severity CVEs generated by AI.

Product

  • Home
  • Sitemap
  • RSS Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2026 CVEReports. All rights reserved.

Made with love by Amit Schendel & Alon Barad



CVE-2026-49471

CVE-2026-49471: Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution in Serena MCP Toolkit via DNS Rebinding and Memory Poisoning

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
Software Engineer

Jul 8, 2026·5 min read·177 visits

Executive Summary (TL;DR)

Serena's unauthenticated Flask API on local port 24282 is vulnerable to DNS Rebinding. Remote attackers can leverage malicious web pages to bypass the browser Same-Origin Policy, poison the AI agent's memory, and trigger arbitrary command execution on the developer's workstation.

CVE-2026-49471 is a high-severity security vulnerability in Serena, an AI-assisted coding Model Context Protocol (MCP) toolkit. In versions prior to v1.5.2, Serena's built-in web dashboard exposes an unauthenticated Flask API on a predictable port. Lacking host validation and CSRF protections, this endpoint is vulnerable to DNS Rebinding. An attacker can lure a user to a malicious webpage, bypass the Same-Origin Policy (SOP), rewrite the AI agent's persistent memory, and execute arbitrary commands on the host operating system via the autonomous agent's shell execution engine.

Vulnerability Overview

Serena is an AI-assisted coding Model Context Protocol (MCP) toolkit providing semantic retrieval, indexing, and direct workspace editing capabilities. To provide interactive diagnostics to developers, Serena initializes a local Flask-based web application hosting its workspace dashboard on a predictable TCP port (24282).

This dashboard exposes administrative APIs that allow direct read and write access to the tool's underlying data stores, memory, and task configurations. In vulnerable versions, this Flask dashboard contains no authentication mechanism, session tokens, or cross-origin request restrictions, which presents an extensive unauthenticated local attack surface.

While the application is typically bound to the loopback interface, standard browser security protections such as the Same-Origin Policy (SOP) are insufficient to protect the local endpoints. By leveraging DNS Rebinding, external web origins can communicate directly with the local server to execute administrative functions.

Root Cause Analysis

The root cause of this vulnerability lies in a critical combination of insecure defaults: binding to a predictable hardcoded port, missing API-level authentication, and an absence of HTTP Host header validation.

Serena configures its local Flask application to bind to port 24282, which is hardcoded as hexadecimal value 0x5EDA within the configuration file constants.py. Because the endpoint is predictable, attackers can construct cross-origin web requests targeting this exact port without requiring prior network reconnaissance. Crucially, the endpoints do not validate the HTTP Host header of incoming requests.

In a DNS Rebinding attack, an attacker-controlled external domain has its DNS Time-To-Live (TTL) set to a low value. The victim's browser loads a malicious page from this domain, caches the initial resolution, and then re-queries the domain after the TTL expires. The attacker's DNS server then resolves the domain to 127.0.0.1. The browser, treating this as the same origin, issues asynchronous POST requests to the local Serena service. Because the application processes requests containing arbitrary Host headers, the browser's Same-Origin Policy is bypassed, allowing state manipulation on the local application.

Code-Level Analysis

The vulnerability exists because Serena did not check the routing details of the request headers before processing endpoints. In versions prior to v1.5.2, any HTTP request hitting the dashboard was authorized automatically.

The remediation, committed in hash 016ccbe1c095a3eed7967737ac1d4df2754f5d96 inside src/serena/dashboard.py, introduces a pre-request filtering mechanism using Flask's before_request hook:

# Verify host and port on each request to prevent DNS-rebinding-based attacks
@self._app.before_request
def check_host() -> None:
    allowed = {f"127.0.0.1:{port}", f"localhost:{port}"}
    if request.host not in allowed:
        abort(403)

This filter asserts that the request.host attribute strictly matches either 127.0.0.1 or localhost bound to the active port. If an external browser script makes a request using a rebound domain name, the Host header (e.g., rebound.attacker.com:24282) will fail this set-membership validation, and the application will abort the request with an HTTP 403 Forbidden status.

Exploitation & Execution Flow

To successfully exploit the vulnerability, the attacker must host a DNS rebinding service and convince a developer running Serena to visit a malicious website.

The malicious script issues an asynchronous POST request to /api/memory containing payload data targeting Serena's persistent memory. Once the persistent memory store is poisoned, Serena's autonomous agent reads the modified instruction list during its next iteration loop. The agent, attempting to fulfill the injected task, invokes its integrated execute_shell_command module. This tool utilizes Python's subprocess engine with shell=True, executing the raw string payload and resulting in full remote code execution.

Impact & Security Consequences

An exploitation of CVE-2026-49471 leads to complete compromise of the developer's workstation. Because the shell commands run with the context of the user running Serena, the attacker gains access to SSH keys, local source code repositories, application credentials, and cloud service configuration files.

The CVSS v3.1 score is evaluated at 8.3 (High). The score reflects high impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability, combined with a Scope change (S:C) since execution escapes the browser sandbox to influence the underlying operating system. The rating is limited only by the high complexity of configuring the DNS rebinding infrastructure and the requirement for user interaction.

As development environments are highly valued targets for supply-chain pivot attacks, compromising an active developer's machine using this method provides a potential gateway to enterprise build pipelines and internal source control platforms.

Remediation and Residual Risk

The standard remediation is upgrading the Serena tool suite to version v1.5.2 or later, which enforces Host header validation on the web server routing engine.

Despite the implemented fix, minor security considerations remain. The validation set does not explicitly account for IPv6 loopback bindings (e.g., [::1]:{port}). In environment configurations where Serena binds to dual-stack interfaces, variations in browser routing might still expose endpoints if loopback resolving exhibits non-standard behavior.

Furthermore, because the local API still lacks CSRF tokens or authentication secrets, any Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability found in another application running on localhost (such as a local development server on port 3000) could still be leveraged to perform requests to Serena, as those requests would carry a valid localhost:24282 Host header.

Official Patches

oraiosFix commit implementing Host header validation
oraiosGitHub Security Advisory GHSA-37h2-6p4f-mp3q

Fix Analysis (1)

Technical Appendix

CVSS Score
8.3/ 10
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Probability
0.24%
Top 85% most exploited

Affected Systems

Serena Model Context Protocol (MCP) Toolkit

Affected Versions Detail

Product
Affected Versions
Fixed Version
serena
oraios
< 1.5.2v1.5.2
AttributeDetail
CWE IDCWE-306 / CWE-352
Attack VectorNetwork (with User Interaction)
CVSS v3.1 Score8.3 (High)
EPSS Score0.00237 (Percentile: 14.61%)
Exploit StatusProof of Concept (PoC) available
ImpactUnauthenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE)
KEV StatusNot Listed

MITRE ATT&CK Mapping

T1190Exploit Public-Facing Application
Initial Access
T1189Drive-by Compromise
Initial Access
CWE-306
Missing Authentication for Critical Function

The product does not perform any authentication for a functionality that requires a security defense or identity check.

Vulnerability Timeline

Security patch committed to the Serena repository
2026-05-26
GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-37h2-6p4f-mp3q published
2026-07-07
CVE-2026-49471 published by CVE.org and NVD
2026-07-07

References & Sources

  • [1]GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-37h2-6p4f-mp3q
  • [2]Official Security Fix Commit
  • [3]Serena v1.5.2 Release Tag
  • [4]NVD Vulnerability Record
  • [5]CVE.org CVE-2026-49471 Record

Attack Flow Diagram

Press enter or space to select a node. You can then use the arrow keys to move the node around. Press delete to remove it and escape to cancel.
Press enter or space to select an edge. You can then press delete to remove it or escape to cancel.

More Reports

•about 1 hour ago•CVE-2026-105806
8.6

CVE-2026-105806: Privilege Escalation and Missing Authorization in @payloadcms/plugin-mcp

CVE-2026-105806 is an improper access control vulnerability within the Model Context Protocol (MCP) plugin for Payload CMS. Authenticated users with low privileges can manipulate API key creation and mapping to associate keys with arbitrary users, including administrators. This allows total session takeovers and privilege escalation via MCP-authenticated API requests.

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
5 views•5 min read
•about 2 hours ago•CVE-2026-105848
6.4

CVE-2026-105848: Insufficient Access Control in Payload CMS Stripe REST Proxy

An access control vulnerability in `@payloadcms/plugin-stripe` allows authenticated low-privilege users to bypass authorization boundaries and execute arbitrary, highly privileged operations on the connected Stripe platform via an exposed REST proxy.

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
6 views•7 min read
•about 3 hours ago•CVE-2026-105851
9.3

CVE-2026-105851: Privilege Escalation via Field Access Control Bypass in Payload CMS Duplication Mechanism

A critical access control bypass vulnerability (CVE-2026-105851) in Payload CMS allows authenticated users to bypass field-level access controls during document duplication. By duplicating high-privilege documents, such as administrator accounts, standard users can inherit sensitive fields (e.g., role configurations or API keys), leading to privilege escalation.

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
6 views•7 min read
•about 4 hours ago•CVE-2026-105853
7.1

CVE-2026-105853: Sensitive Information Disclosure and Authentication Collection Boundary Bypass in Payload CMS

CVE-2026-105853 is a high-severity information disclosure vulnerability in Payload CMS that affects authentication-enabled collections. In vulnerable versions, the application fails to properly serialize and sanitize user documents during token refresh and password reset operations. This deficiency leaks hidden and read-restricted fields to unauthorized actors. Additionally, a logical flaw in token refresh validation allows low-privileged users to cross collection boundaries, exposing sensitive configuration details and administrative metadata.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
6 views•5 min read
•about 5 hours ago•CVE-2026-105852
5.3

CVE-2026-105852: Authorization Bypass and Related-Document Oracle in Payload CMS

An authorization bypass vulnerability in Payload CMS enables unauthenticated attackers to query and infer the existence of restricted documents via nested relationship queries on public collections. This cross-document contamination flaw affects both MongoDB and Drizzle SQL database adapters, allowing unauthorized reads of relationship metadata.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
5 views•6 min read
•about 6 hours ago•CVE-2026-105850
8.8

CVE-2026-105850: Race Condition and Order Double-Processing in @payloadcms/plugin-ecommerce

A high-severity race condition vulnerability exists in @payloadcms/plugin-ecommerce within the Stripe payment adapter's order confirmation pipeline. Unauthenticated attackers or parallel webhook deliveries can exploit sequential, non-atomic database operations to bypass state verifications, leading to duplicate order creation, multiple inventory decrements, and inconsistent database records.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
6 views•7 min read