Jul 17, 2026·5 min read·316 visits
Unauthenticated remote security feature bypass in Microsoft SharePoint Server allows full authentication bypass due to weak token validation logic.
CVE-2026-55040 is a critical security feature bypass vulnerability in Microsoft SharePoint Server arising from a weak authentication mechanism (CWE-1390). An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this security flaw over a network to bypass authentication validation routines, gaining unauthorized access to the application and complete control over sensitive enterprise data assets without any user interaction.
Microsoft SharePoint Server relies on IIS (Internet Information Services) and ASP.NET to process and authorize incoming HTTP requests. The framework utilizes a claims-based authentication architecture to transform identity assertions into security tokens, which are verified by backend modules. The security boundary depends on the cryptographic validation of these identity tokens before establishing an authenticated user session.
The attack surface for CVE-2026-55040 comprises exposed endpoints within SharePoint Web applications that handle user credentials or process session state. These endpoints, such as those exposed under the _vti_bin or _layouts virtual directories, are reachable remotely without authentication under default configurations.
The vulnerability is classified under CWE-1390 (Weak Authentication). Due to a logical flaw in how identity claims are processed, the application allows an unauthorized remote attacker to bypass verification boundaries and gain authenticated access to SharePoint resources.
The root cause of CVE-2026-55040 lies in the validation logic within SharePoint's token-parsing modules. During the authentication handshake, the server processes claims tokens containing user credentials and authorization levels. Typically, a FedAuth cookie or SAML token is decrypted and verified against cryptographic signatures to ensure its integrity and source authenticity.
In vulnerable versions of SharePoint Server, a logical check within the token validation routine fails to verify the signature of the claims token when specific HTTP headers or parameters are present in the request. The server-side logic mistakenly assumes that upstream reverse proxies or gateway components have already performed the necessary cryptographic validation.
Because of this weak validation, an attacker can submit a crafted token without a valid signature. The server accepts the unverified claims as authentic, parses the arbitrary identities defined inside the token, and initializes a fully privileged security context for the user session.
SharePoint Server is a closed-source product, meaning raw source code of the affected assemblies is not publicly available. However, reverse-engineering of the cumulative security patches reveals changes in assemblies responsible for federated authentication and token processing, such as SPFederationAuthenticationModule.
Below is a conceptual C# representation illustrating the vulnerable logic versus the patched verification routine:
// Conceptual representation of vulnerable validation logic
public class SPFederationAuthenticationModule
{
public ClaimsPrincipal ValidateToken(SecurityToken token, HttpRequest request)
{
// VULNERABILITY: Bypassing signature verification based on client-controlled or upstream proxy headers
if (request.Headers["X-Upstream-Verified"] == "true")
{
// Trusted gateway assumption leads to an authentication bypass
return CreatePrincipalFromTokenClaims(token);
}
if (!VerifyTokenSignature(token))
{
throw new SecurityTokenValidationException("Invalid token signature");
}
return CreatePrincipalFromTokenClaims(token);
}
}The corresponding patched code forces signature validation of all claims tokens, removing ambient validation assumptions:
// Conceptual representation of patched validation logic
public class SPFederationAuthenticationModule
{
public ClaimsPrincipal ValidateToken(SecurityToken token, HttpRequest request)
{
// FIX: Enforce cryptographic verification of the token signature in all cases
if (!VerifyTokenSignature(token))
{
throw new SecurityTokenValidationException("Invalid token signature");
}
return CreatePrincipalFromTokenClaims(token);
}
}The patch successfully eliminates the logical branch that allowed token signatures to bypass validation. This completely mitigates the weak authentication flaw by requiring cryptographic integrity verification for every incoming authentication payload.
Exploitation of CVE-2026-55040 requires network access to the target SharePoint Server instance but requires no privileges or credentials. The attacker interacts directly with the exposed IIS endpoints of the SharePoint application.
The attack is initiated by sending a crafted HTTP request with a malformed claims token accompanied by specific request headers designed to trigger the vulnerable validation path. When the request is received by the IIS worker process (w3wp.exe), the authentication pipeline parses the claims token but bypasses the signature checks.
Upon successful exploitation, the backend establishes an active session under the identity specified in the malicious claims token (e.g., SharePoint\System or another high-privilege account). The attacker is then granted unauthorized read and write access to the SharePoint farm APIs and content database. Security teams can look for anomalies in IIS logs, such as unexpected requests to authentication endpoints with administrative user-agents or suspicious header structures.
The CVSS base score of 9.1 reflects the critical nature of this security feature bypass. Successful exploitation leads to a total compromise of confidentiality and integrity within the affected SharePoint Server environment.
Attackers can read, modify, or delete sensitive business documents, proprietary data, and SharePoint site configurations. The compromise of SharePoint databases can also expose service account credentials stored in config files or memory, which can be leveraged for active lateral movement within the active directory domain.
While the CVSS vector designates no direct availability impact (A:N), the integrity compromise is severe enough to allow attackers to overwrite system configurations, indirectly impacting application availability and business continuity.
The absolute remediation for CVE-2026-55040 is the application of Microsoft's official cumulative updates (CUs). Administrators must identify and patch vulnerable versions of SharePoint Server 2016, 2019, and Subscription Edition as detailed in the vendor documentation.
If immediate patching is not possible, organizations should implement network-level segmentations. Restricting access to SharePoint virtual directories and limiting administrative portal access to trusted IP ranges will restrict external exploitation attempts.
Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) can also be configured to drop incoming external requests containing custom routing or upstream verification headers (such as X-Upstream-Verified or similar gateway assertions) that might target the weak validation logic. However, these temporary mitigations are not complete substitutes for applying the cumulative security updates.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N| Product | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|
SharePoint Enterprise Server 2016 Microsoft | >= 16.0.0, < 16.0.5561.1001 | 16.0.5561.1001 |
SharePoint Server 2019 Microsoft | >= 16.0.0, < 16.0.10417.20175 | 16.0.10417.20175 |
SharePoint Server Subscription Edition Microsoft | >= 16.0.0, < 16.0.19725.20434 | 16.0.19725.20434 |
| Attribute | Detail |
|---|---|
| CWE ID | CWE-1390 (Weak Authentication) |
| Attack Vector | Network |
| CVSS Base Score | 9.1 (Critical) |
| EPSS Score | 0.00668 |
| Impact | Confidentiality: High, Integrity: High, Availability: None |
| Exploit Status | None (No public exploit or PoC available) |
| CISA KEV Status | Not listed |
The product uses an authentication mechanism that does not adequately verify the identity of the actor.
An LDAP injection vulnerability exists in the centraldogma-server-auth-shiro module of LY Corporation Central Dogma before version 0.84.0. The search logic dynamically constructs LDAP search filters by interpolating user-provided usernames without escaping RFC 4515 metacharacters. Unauthenticated remote attackers can leverage this flaw to bypass authentication, enumerate directory hierarchies, and access unauthorized resources.
CVE-2026-11746 is a critical vulnerability in Central Dogma Server prior to version 0.84.0, where an embedded ZooKeeper replication secret silently falls back to a publicly known, hard-coded default string ('ch4n63m3'). Remote attackers with access to the replication network can authenticate as legitimate cluster peers, potentially leading to unauthorized data exposure, state manipulation, or complete cluster takeover.
A logical verification flaw in ZITADEL's external JWT Identity Provider validation allows attackers to bypass session expiration checks. If an incoming JWT lacks the 'exp' claim, the system skips validation entirely, creating an indefinitely valid session. This issue has been addressed in versions 3.4.12 and 4.15.2.
CVE-2026-59149 identifies a directory traversal vulnerability in `@mockoon/commons-server`, the backend mock-server library powering the Mockoon application. The flaw occurs in the path containment validation logic used during raw file response generation. An unauthenticated attacker can exploit this weakness to retrieve arbitrary files from sibling directories sharing a common prefix with the designated static base directory.
An in-depth analysis of CVE-2026-59148, a high-severity flaw in Mockoon where unauthenticated administrative endpoints and a wildcard Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) policy allow remote execution, state poisoning, and credential theft.
An improper authentication vulnerability (CWE-287) in ZITADEL's external identity provider handler before version 4.15.3 allows remote attackers to perform complete account takeover. When auto-linking by email is enabled, ZITADEL verifies that the local target account has a verified email address but fails to verify if the external provider confirmed ownership of that same email. Attackers can exploit this by registering an unverified account with a victim's email address on a permissive external provider, leading to unauthorized account binding and persistent access.