CVEReports
CVEReports

Automated vulnerability intelligence platform. Comprehensive reports for high-severity CVEs generated by AI.

Product

  • Home
  • Sitemap
  • RSS Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2026 CVEReports. All rights reserved.

Made with love by Amit Schendel & Alon Barad



CVE-2026-56742

CVE-2026-56742: Missing ReferenceGrant Authorization Check in Cilium Gateway API Request Mirroring

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
Senior Security Researcher

Sep 25, 2026·6 min read·4 visits

Executive Summary (TL;DR)

A validation bypass in Cilium's Gateway API controller allows namespaced users to configure traffic mirroring filters that copy and redirect live request streams to unauthorized services in other namespaces, bypassing the Kubernetes Gateway API ReferenceGrant security boundary.

Cilium, a cloud-native networking and security solution for Kubernetes, contains a security bypass vulnerability in its translation engine for Gateway API resources. When parsing HTTPRoute and GRPCRoute configurations, the Cilium Operator fails to apply ReferenceGrant authorization checks to RequestMirror filters. This flaw allows a user with restricted namespace-level permissions to mirror and route traffic to services across namespace boundaries without authorization, leading to cross-namespace data leaks.

Vulnerability Overview

Cilium is an open-source, cloud-native networking, observability, and security solution designed for Kubernetes environments. It utilizes eBPF technology to provide high-performance container networking, service mesh functionality, and security enforcement at the data plane layer. Within Cilium, the Kubernetes Gateway API is implemented to manage ingress and service routing, utilizing Envoy as the underlying proxy to execute complex traffic routing policies.

In Kubernetes environments implementing the Gateway API, resource access across namespaces is strictly governed by security specifications. The ReferenceGrant resource defines explicit boundaries, allowing services in one namespace to safely reference backends or routes in another namespace. When these boundaries are not enforced, tenant isolation fails, exposing internal services to unauthorized routing configurations from other namespaces.

This vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2026-56742, constitutes a missing authorization check within the Cilium Operator's route translation engine. Under specific configurations, namespaced users can configure traffic mirroring filters to redirect data streams to unauthorized services. By default, the Gateway API functionality is disabled in Cilium, which mitigates the immediate exposure of unconfigured clusters.

Root Cause Analysis

The root cause of CVE-2026-56742 lies in the logical separation of validation steps within the Cilium Operator's translation pipeline. When parsing standard backend routing targets (spec.rules[].backendRefs), the operator calls validation routines to verify namespace permissions. This validation leverages the ReferenceGrant API to confirm whether the target namespace permits references from the source route's namespace.

However, a discrepancy was introduced in the handling of traffic mirroring filters, specifically HTTPRouteFilterRequestMirror and GRPCRouteFilterRequestMirror. During translation of these filters, the operator extracted the backend reference of the mirror target and directly resolved the corresponding Kubernetes Service object. It performed this resolution without subjecting the mirror's target reference to the IsBackendReferenceAllowed validation function.

This flaw allows a namespaced user to bypass standard cross-namespace authorization mechanisms entirely. Because the Envoy control plane configuration is compiled directly from these parsed models, Cilium instructs the Envoy proxy to duplicate and forward live request traffic to the unauthorized target. This architecture creates an undocumented and unauthorized pathway for data transmission across administrative boundaries.

Code Analysis

An analysis of the vulnerable and patched source code in operator/pkg/model/ingestion/gateway.go demonstrates how the omission was addressed. In the unpatched version, the operator processed the RequestMirror filters without verifying permissions. The translation code simply resolved the service specification and appended the mirror configuration directly to the compiled route model.

// Unpatched logic in operator/pkg/model/ingestion/gateway.go
case gatewayv1.HTTPRouteFilterRequestMirror:
    svc := getServiceSpec(string(f.RequestMirror.BackendRef.Name), helpers.NamespaceDerefOr(f.RequestMirror.BackendRef.Namespace, hr.Namespace), services)
    if svc != nil {
        requestMirrors = append(requestMirrors, toHTTPRequestMirror(*svc, f.RequestMirror, hr.Namespace))
    }

The security patch inserts a validation step before retrieving the target service spec. It first ensures the RequestMirror filter structure itself is not null to prevent nil-pointer panics. It then calls helpers.IsBackendReferenceAllowed, passing the source namespace, the backend reference, the routing scheme group, and the collection of active grants.

// Patched logic in operator/pkg/model/ingestion/gateway.go
case gatewayv1.HTTPRouteFilterRequestMirror:
    if f.RequestMirror == nil {
        continue
    }
 
    if !helpers.IsBackendReferenceAllowed(hr.GetNamespace(),
        gatewayv1.BackendRef{BackendObjectReference: f.RequestMirror.BackendRef},
        gatewayv1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithKind("HTTPRoute"), grants) {
        continue
    }
 
    svc := getServiceSpec(string(f.RequestMirror.BackendRef.Name), helpers.NamespaceDerefOr(f.RequestMirror.BackendRef.Namespace, hr.Namespace), services)
    if svc != nil {
        requestMirrors = append(requestMirrors, toHTTPRequestMirror(*svc, f.RequestMirror, hr.Namespace))
    }

This remediation ensures that if the reference is not explicitly permitted by an active ReferenceGrant resource in the destination namespace, the loop skips the mirror filter. A parallel fix was applied to the extractGRPCRoutes function to secure GRPCRoute instances, ensuring complete coverage across both protocols.

Exploitation & Attack Methodology

Exploitation of this vulnerability requires the attacker to have Kubernetes Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) permissions to create or modify HTTPRoute or GRPCRoute resources in at least one namespace. No cluster-wide administrative privileges are required, making this an effective vector for privilege escalation and lateral movement in multi-tenant environments. The attacker must target a cluster where the Cilium Gateway API is enabled.

To execute the attack, the attacker deploys a route containing a RequestMirror filter targeting a sensitive service in a different namespace, such as secure-service in tenant-b. Normally, this configuration would be rejected during control-plane validation due to the absence of an authorizing ReferenceGrant. Under the vulnerable version of Cilium, the operator compiles this configuration into Envoy directives without warning.

Once the route is applied, any legitimate traffic sent to the attacker's ingress route is duplicated at the proxy layer. The duplicate request, containing all original HTTP headers, cookies, and payloads, is forwarded to the target service. This enables the attacker to trigger unintended actions or interact with backends residing inside isolated network zones.

Impact Assessment

The security impact of CVE-2026-56742 is classified as a multi-tenancy logical security bypass. In a Kubernetes cluster configured for multiple distinct tenants, namespace isolation is the primary barrier preventing cross-tenant data exposure. By subverting the ReferenceGrant enforcement, this vulnerability breaks the logical isolation layer, enabling cross-boundary data routing.

An attacker who successfully exploits this flaw can exfiltrate sensitive data by mirroring request streams. If the mirrored requests contain authorization headers, session cookies, or proprietary payloads, those secrets are transmitted directly to the unauthorized destination. This could lead to a secondary compromise of services running within the target namespace.

According to the National Vulnerability Database (NVD), the CVSS v3.1 score is evaluated at 5.9 (Medium) with a vector of CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L. The rating reflects that while the attack complexity is low and no user interaction is required, it requires high privileges (namespaced route creation) and is limited to adjacent network topologies. However, in shared environments, the impact on integrity and confidentiality can be significant.

Remediation & Mitigation

Remediation requires upgrading the Cilium container images to a version containing the official patches. The fix has been backported to all active release branches. Administrators should deploy the updated operators and agents according to their standard upgrade procedures.

For deployments where an immediate upgrade is not feasible, several temporary mitigation strategies can be applied. First, restrict RBAC permissions for HTTPRoute and GRPCRoute resources across the cluster. Ensure that only fully trusted service accounts and administrators have creation or modification privileges for these custom resources.

Additionally, audit active routing configurations to detect unauthorized cross-namespace references. Cluster administrators can execute queries to list routes containing mirror filters that reference foreign namespaces. If any unauthorized configurations are found, the offending route resources should be deleted immediately to prevent continued traffic redirection.

Fix Analysis (4)

Technical Appendix

CVSS Score
5.9/ 10
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
EPSS Probability
0.28%
Top 82% most exploited

Affected Systems

Cilium v1.17.x before v1.17.17Cilium v1.18.x before v1.18.11Cilium v1.19.x before v1.19.5

Affected Versions Detail

Product
Affected Versions
Fixed Version
Cilium
Cilium
>= 1.17.0, < 1.17.17v1.17.17
Cilium
Cilium
>= 1.18.0, < 1.18.11v1.18.11
Cilium
Cilium
>= 1.19.0, < 1.19.5v1.19.5
AttributeDetail
CWE IDCWE-862 (Missing Authorization)
Attack VectorAdjacent Network (AV:A)
CVSS Score5.9 (Medium)
EPSS Score0.00276
ImpactSecurity Bypass and Cross-Namespace Traffic Mirroring
Exploit Statusnone
KEV StatusNot Listed

MITRE ATT&CK Mapping

T1068Exploitation for Privilege Escalation
Privilege Escalation
CWE-862
Missing Authorization

The software does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, or when configuring a backend component on behalf of an actor.

Vulnerability Timeline

Vulnerability published in GitHub Advisory Database (GHSA-w7c2-w76w-5hmj)
2026-07-15
Patched versions v1.17.17, v1.18.11, and v1.19.5 released
2026-07-15
CVE-2026-56742 details and CVSS scoring updated in the National Vulnerability Database
2026-07-17

References & Sources

  • [1]Cilium Security Advisory GHSA-w7c2-w76w-5hmj
  • [2]CVE-2026-56742 Record
  • [3]NVD Vulnerability Details
  • [4]Cilium v1.17.17 Release
  • [5]Cilium v1.18.11 Release
  • [6]Cilium v1.19.5 Release

Attack Flow Diagram

Press enter or space to select a node. You can then use the arrow keys to move the node around. Press delete to remove it and escape to cancel.
Press enter or space to select an edge. You can then press delete to remove it or escape to cancel.

More Reports

•31 minutes ago•CVE-2026-61788
7.4

CVE-2026-61788: Read-Only Bypass in DBHub Database Model Context Protocol Server

CVE-2026-61788 identifies a critical vulnerability in DBHub, an open-source database Model Context Protocol (MCP) server designed to manage and interact with database engines including PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQL Server, Oracle, MariaDB, and SQLite. Prior to version 0.22.6, DBHub fails to securely enforce its declared 'readonly' execution mode. Unauthenticated remote attackers can bypass keyword-based filters and transaction controls to execute arbitrary write operations, manipulate database sequences, read or write files on the host operating system, and potentially execute arbitrary system commands.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
1 views•8 min read
•about 3 hours ago•CVE-2026-57231
7.5

CVE-2026-57231: Podman Malformed Image Host Environment Variable Leak

CVE-2026-57231 is a high-severity vulnerability in the Podman container engine. When executing a container from a crafted OCI or Docker image, malformed environment variable entries lacking an equals separator can trigger an unexpected behavior in the spec generation parser. This vulnerability enables a container image to silently exfiltrate host environment variables into the running container workspace, exposing high-privilege credentials and sensitive runtime secrets.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
6 views•8 min read
•about 3 hours ago•CVE-2026-74480
9.8

CVE-2026-74480: Use-After-Free in Linux Kernel Network Bridge Multicast Routing

CVE-2026-74480 is a critical memory safety vulnerability in the Linux kernel's network bridge multicast routing subsystem (net: bridge) resulting from a Use-After-Free (UAF) condition during fast-leave processing of IGMP/MLD multicast groups.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
7 views•6 min read
•about 3 hours ago•CVE-2026-21992
9.8

Oracle Fusion Middleware Security Alert Advisory - CVE-2026-21992

CVE-2026-21992 is a critical, unauthenticated remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability affecting the REST WebServices component of Oracle Identity Manager (OIM) and the Web Services Security component of Oracle Web Services Manager (OWSM). Exploitation occurs over standard network protocols without user interaction, enabling a complete compromise of target system infrastructure.

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
4 views•6 min read
•about 4 hours ago•CVE-2026-61782
7.5

CVE-2026-61782: Sensitive Information Disclosure and Source Code Exfiltration via Insecure HTTP Server Defaults in @rsdoctor/rspack-plugin

An insecure configuration in the diagnostic HTTP server of @rsdoctor/rspack-plugin allowed unauthenticated remote attackers or malicious local websites to retrieve serialized build metadata and full source code modules.

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
5 views•7 min read
•about 5 hours ago•CVE-2026-59980
6.3

CVE-2026-59980: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption in python-hyper/hpack

CVE-2026-59980 is a CPU exhaustion vulnerability in python-hyper/hpack, where an unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger an infinite loop or high computational complexity overhead by sending a crafted HTTP/2 stream containing excessive variable-length integer continuation octets.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
8 views•8 min read