CVEReports
CVEReports

Automated vulnerability intelligence platform. Comprehensive reports for high-severity CVEs generated by AI.

Product

  • Home
  • Sitemap
  • RSS Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2026 CVEReports. All rights reserved.

Made with love by Amit Schendel & Alon Barad



CVE-2026-62388

CVE-2026-62388: Insecure Default Security Enforcement in Natural Language Toolkit (NLTK) Path Security Module

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
Senior Security Researcher

Sep 2, 2026·6 min read·12 visits

Executive Summary (TL;DR)

NLTK versions prior to 3.10.0 initialized path security in an inactive 'fail-open' state by default, allowing attackers to bypass path traversal, SSRF, and zip-extraction protections.

CVE-2026-62388 represents a critical design flaw in the Natural Language Toolkit (NLTK) before version 3.10.0. The central security module (`nltk/pathsec.py`) initialized its validation enforcement flag to false by default. This fail-open configuration rendered security controls—such as path traversal checks, zip archive audits, and SSRF validations—non-blocking, only emitting warnings while permitting arbitrary file operations and code execution.

Vulnerability Overview

The Natural Language Toolkit (NLTK) is a widely deployed Python library utilized for natural language processing, corpus ingestion, and linguistic resource management. To mitigate risks associated with untrusted data handling, the library introduced a centralized security mechanism within the nltk/pathsec.py module. This component acts as an intermediary layer designed to intercept and validate filesystem accesses, archive extractions, and remote network resource resolutions.

The security framework utilizes a sequence of checks to verify whether requested file paths or URLs fall within authorized system boundaries. This design is critical for applications that process user-provided corpora or download dynamic datasets from external endpoints. If implemented securely, these mechanisms protect the local host from path traversal, arbitrary file writes, and Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vectors.

Under default installations before version 3.10.0, this validation layer operated in an inactive state. The underlying architecture permitted bypasses of all validation logic because security boundaries failed open upon violation detection. This defect is classified as CWE-1188: Initialization of a Resource with an Insecure Default.

Root Cause Analysis

The primary flaw resides in the default initialization of the security enforcement flag in nltk/pathsec.py. The module defines a global variable, ENFORCE, which governs whether detected security violations trigger fatal execution exceptions or merely report diagnostic events. Prior to version 3.10.0, this variable was statically set to ENFORCE = False.

When the validation functions, such as validate_path(), encountered an unauthorized directory path, they evaluated the destination against an allowed list of roots. If the path was situated outside these boundaries, the validation logic constructed an error string. However, instead of halting execution via an exception, the logic executed a conditional branch based on the ENFORCE parameter.

Because ENFORCE evaluated to false, the system skipped raising a PermissionError. It instead dispatched a non-blocking RuntimeWarning to standard error and returned execution control to the calling module. Consequently, downstream file operations and network connections proceeded with unvalidated input parameters.

Code Analysis & Differences

To understand the exact structural vulnerability, compare the implementation of nltk/pathsec.py before and after the 3.10.0 security update. The original code initialized the enforcement mechanism to false and handled file scheme URIs without adequate platform-specific normalization.

# ORIGINAL IMPLEMENTATION
ENFORCE = False  # Vulnerable: validation fails open by default
 
def validate_network_url(url, context="NLTK"):
    parsed = urlparse(url)
    if parsed.scheme == "file":
        # Path is not normalized for Windows syntax
        validate_path(unquote(parsed.path), context=f"{context}.file_scheme")
        return

The patched implementation switches the default enforcement value to true. It also implements specific normalization routines for Windows-style absolute paths and rejects non-local UNC file scheme authorities.

# PATCHED IMPLEMENTATION
ENFORCE = True  # Secure: validation fails closed by default
 
def validate_network_url(url, context="NLTK"):
    parsed = urlparse(url)
    if parsed.scheme == "file":
        file_path = unquote(parsed.path)
        netloc = parsed.netloc
 
        # Restrict validation context to local file schemes only
        if netloc not in ("", "localhost"):
            raise OSError(
                f"Security Violation [{context}.file_scheme]: "
                f"Non-local file URI authority not allowed: {netloc!r}"
            )
 
        # Normalize Windows-style URIs (e.g., /C:/path/to/file)
        if (
            os.name == "nt"
            and len(file_path) >= 3
            and file_path[0] == "/"
            and file_path[2] == ":"
        ):
            file_path = file_path[1:]
 
        validate_path(file_path, context=f"{context}.file_scheme")
        return

The addition of platform-specific normalization prevents attackers from bypassing path validation on Windows hosts by encoding file paths as URIs. The following flow diagram demonstrates the execution logic changes:

Attack Vectors & Exploitation Scenarios

Exploitation of CVE-2026-62388 does not require specialized toolsets. An attacker can execute a path traversal attack if an application endpoint exposes parameters to NLTK's file loading methods. By submitting sequences containing parent directory traversal operators (such as ../../), the attacker can read arbitrary files within the filesystem scope of the running process.

A secondary attack vector involves Zip Slip during corpus installation. If an application utilizes NLTK's download interface and is coerced into connecting to a malicious repository index, it will download a compromised ZIP archive. When extraction begins, the traversal checks detect entries targeting directories outside the target installation root, but the execution continues past the non-blocking warning.

This allows the extraction process to write files into sensitive directories. Attackers can overwrite Python modules, install malicious cron jobs, or place executable web shells. If the target system is subsequently configured to load models using serialization formats like pickle, the attacker can supply a malicious payload that triggers arbitrary shell execution during model deserialization.

Concurrency Vulnerability in Downloader Module

The security patch for NLTK 3.10.0 also resolves a concurrency issue within the package downloader module, nltk/downloader.py. Previously, the synchronization logic used the target download filename as an implicit installation lock. This lock was released prematurely as soon as the raw download completed, leaving the subsequent extraction phase unprotected.

# ORIGINAL Downloader Synchronization Flaw
# The temporary download file ('tmp_filepath') acted as a lock.
# Once os.replace(tmp_filepath, filepath) completed, other threads or
# processes assumed the package was fully ready.
os.replace(tmp_filepath, filepath)
# Unzipping occurred after this step without mutual exclusion, causing race conditions.
self._unzip(filepath, download_dir)

To correct this, the patch introduces a distinct .lock file covering both the downloading and extraction phases. The implementation leverages atomic file creation using the low-level os.open function with exclusive flags.

# PATCHED Downloader Synchronization
lock_filepath = filepath + ".lock"
# Acquire a dedicated install lock covering download and extraction
while True:
    try:
        fd = os.open(lock_filepath, os.O_CREAT | os.O_EXCL | os.O_WRONLY)
        os.close(fd)
        break
    except FileExistsError:
        # Handle zombie lock timeouts or wait intervals
        time.sleep(POLL_INTERVAL)

This mechanism ensures that parallel processes cannot access a partially extracted or manipulated archive. It addresses synchronization gaps that could be abused to observe or manipulate files during the window between retrieval and deployment.

Remediation & Defensive Controls

The primary and recommended resolution is to upgrade NLTK deployments to version 3.10.0 or later. This release enforces validation controls out of the box. For organizations unable to perform immediate software upgrades, a programmatic workaround is available by manually overriding the state at the application bootstrap level.

import warnings
import nltk.pathsec
 
# Force the enforcement flag to true programmatically
nltk.pathsec.ENFORCE = True
 
# Escalate warnings to exceptions to enforce immediate termination
warnings.filterwarnings(
    "error",
    category=RuntimeWarning,
    message=".*Security Violation.*"
)

Security teams should configure host-based detection rules to parse application logs for the specific Security Violation strings generated by NLTK. Monitoring network logs for unauthorized outbound requests to loopback addresses, local network interfaces, or cloud metadata services will help identify potential SSRF exploitation vectors.

Official Patches

NLTK ProjectSecurity enforcement and downloader hardening commit

Fix Analysis (1)

Technical Appendix

CVSS Score
7.5/ 10
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
EPSS Probability
0.46%
Top 62% most exploited

Affected Systems

Natural Language Toolkit (NLTK)

Affected Versions Detail

Product
Affected Versions
Fixed Version
NLTK
NLTK Project
< 3.10.03.10.0
AttributeDetail
CWE IDCWE-1188
Attack VectorNetwork
CVSS v3.1 Score7.5 (High)
CVSS v4.0 Score8.7 (High)
EPSS Score0.00457
Exploit StatusPoC / Structural Bypass documented
KEV StatusNot Listed

MITRE ATT&CK Mapping

T1190Exploit Public-Facing Application
Initial Access
T1083File and Directory Discovery
Discovery
T1203Exploitation for Client Execution
Execution
CWE-1188
Initialization of a Resource with an Insecure Default

The application initializes a security control to an inactive state by default, requiring explicit user configuration to enable protection.

Known Exploits & Detection

GitHub Security AdvisoryAnalysis of pathsec.py default settings and traversal vector.

Vulnerability Timeline

NLTK commits initial path validation module with ENFORCE = False default
2026-03-17
Pull Request #3593 merged to flip ENFORCE default and add downloader concurrency controls
2026-06-05
CVE-2026-62388 and GHSA-p3m8-78j2-g5p3 publicly disclosed
2026-08-22
NVD completes CVSS assessment
2026-08-27

References & Sources

  • [1]GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-p3m8-78j2-g5p3
  • [2]VulnCheck Security Advisory
  • [3]NLTK Fix Commit
  • [4]NLTK Pull Request #3593
  • [5]NLTK Release v3.10.0

Attack Flow Diagram

Press enter or space to select a node. You can then use the arrow keys to move the node around. Press delete to remove it and escape to cancel.
Press enter or space to select an edge. You can then press delete to remove it or escape to cancel.

More Reports

•about 16 hours ago•CVE-2026-11748
6.9

CVE-2026-11748: Unauthenticated LDAP Injection in Central Dogma Server Authentication

An LDAP injection vulnerability exists in the centraldogma-server-auth-shiro module of LY Corporation Central Dogma before version 0.84.0. The search logic dynamically constructs LDAP search filters by interpolating user-provided usernames without escaping RFC 4515 metacharacters. Unauthenticated remote attackers can leverage this flaw to bypass authentication, enumerate directory hierarchies, and access unauthorized resources.

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
7 views•6 min read
•about 17 hours ago•CVE-2026-11746
9.4

CVE-2026-11746: Use of Hard-coded ZooKeeper Replication Secret 'ch4n63m3' in Central Dogma Server

CVE-2026-11746 is a critical vulnerability in Central Dogma Server prior to version 0.84.0, where an embedded ZooKeeper replication secret silently falls back to a publicly known, hard-coded default string ('ch4n63m3'). Remote attackers with access to the replication network can authenticate as legitimate cluster peers, potentially leading to unauthorized data exposure, state manipulation, or complete cluster takeover.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
4 views•6 min read
•about 18 hours ago•CVE-2026-56665
4.2

CVE-2026-56665: Logical Validation Bypass in ZITADEL External JWT Identity Provider

A logical verification flaw in ZITADEL's external JWT Identity Provider validation allows attackers to bypass session expiration checks. If an incoming JWT lacks the 'exp' claim, the system skips validation entirely, creating an indefinitely valid session. This issue has been addressed in versions 3.4.12 and 4.15.2.

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
4 views•7 min read
•about 19 hours ago•CVE-2026-59149
6.5

CVE-2026-59149: Sibling Directory Path Traversal in Mockoon Backend Server

CVE-2026-59149 identifies a directory traversal vulnerability in `@mockoon/commons-server`, the backend mock-server library powering the Mockoon application. The flaw occurs in the path containment validation logic used during raw file response generation. An unauthenticated attacker can exploit this weakness to retrieve arbitrary files from sibling directories sharing a common prefix with the designated static base directory.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
6 views•5 min read
•about 20 hours ago•CVE-2026-59148
8.8

CVE-2026-59148: Unauthenticated Administrative API and CORS Misconfiguration in Mockoon

An in-depth analysis of CVE-2026-59148, a high-severity flaw in Mockoon where unauthenticated administrative endpoints and a wildcard Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) policy allow remote execution, state poisoning, and credential theft.

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
5 views•6 min read
•about 21 hours ago•CVE-2026-56666
4.8

CVE-2026-56666: Account Takeover via Improper Email Verification in ZITADEL Federated Identity Handler

An improper authentication vulnerability (CWE-287) in ZITADEL's external identity provider handler before version 4.15.3 allows remote attackers to perform complete account takeover. When auto-linking by email is enabled, ZITADEL verifies that the local target account has a verified email address but fails to verify if the external provider confirmed ownership of that same email. Attackers can exploit this by registering an unverified account with a victim's email address on a permissive external provider, leading to unauthorized account binding and persistent access.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
2 views•7 min read