CVEReports
CVEReports

Automated vulnerability intelligence platform. Comprehensive reports for high-severity CVEs generated by AI.

Product

  • Home
  • Sitemap
  • RSS Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2026 CVEReports. All rights reserved.

Made with love by Amit Schendel & Alon Barad



CVE-2026-63435

CVE-2026-63435: Parser Interpretation Conflict in Ruby Mail Gem RFC 2047 Decoders

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
Software Engineer

Sep 3, 2026·5 min read·1 visit

Executive Summary (TL;DR)

The Ruby 'mail' library prior to version 2.9.1 contains a regex and parsing flaw in its RFC 2047 decoding logic, allowing malformed headers to bypass security validations and cause discrepancy exploits between mail agents.

An interpretation conflict (CWE-436) exists in the Ruby 'mail' library's RFC 2047 decoding implementation. Vulnerable versions utilize regular expressions with overly greedy qualifiers and a singular matching strategy. When parsing malformed headers, these design flaws trigger unexpected exception-handling behaviors, outputting raw, unparsed strings. Consequently, intermediate security gateways and downstream Ruby processors interpret email addresses differently, enabling authentication bypasses, phishing, and header spoofing.

Vulnerability Overview

The Ruby mail gem is a standard component utilized across the Ruby and Ruby on Rails ecosystems to generate, parse, and handle email transmission. In versions preceding 2.9.1, the utility modules responsible for parsing MIME-encoded headers exhibit parser discrepancies when handling RFC 2047 compliant 'encoded-words'.

RFC 2047 defines how non-ASCII text should be encoded inside email headers using specific metadata blocks like =?charset?encoding?encoded-text?=. The implementation of these parsers in the mail gem fails to handle multiple, adjoining, or malformed encoded-words sequentially, creating structural parsing conflicts.

Because email validation gateways (such as MTAs or SEGs) evaluate inbound emails differently than the backend application using the vulnerable mail parser, an attacker can exploit this discrepancy. The result is an interpretation conflict (CWE-436) that undermines trust boundaries established by validation protocols like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC.

Root Cause Analysis

The underlying technical flaw resides inside the decoding routines Mail::Utilities.b_value_decode and Mail::Utilities.q_value_decode in lib/mail/utilities.rb. Two specific implementation choices combine to produce the parsing vulnerability.

First, both methods call String#match with regex patterns like /\=\?(.+)?\?[Bb]\?(.*)\?\=/m and /\=\?(.+)?\?[Qq]\?(.*)\?\=/m. The use of String#match limits parsing to only the first matching substring, leaving subsequent encoded segments unparsed or mishandled. Additionally, the charset capturing group (.+)? is greedy. If a header contains multiple delimiters or nested parameters, the regex engine matches across multiple word boundaries to satisfy the wildcard greediness.

Second, the methods implement a broad exception-handling block. If the decoder encounters an unrecognized or malicious charset name (such as a string containing nested boundaries), charset_encoder.encode throws an Encoding::ConverterNotFoundError or ArgumentError. The rescue block responds by returning the raw, unparsed input string using str.dup.force_encoding(Encoding::UTF_8). This fatal rollback behavior exposes downstream parsers to unstripped MIME-token metadata.

Code Analysis

A comparative analysis between the vulnerable implementation and the patch in version 2.9.1 reveals the shift from a singular matching architecture to a global, non-greedy parser.

Vulnerable Implementation

def Utilities.q_value_decode(str)
  # The regex utilizes greedy wildcard patterns and matches only once
  match = str.match(/\=\?(.+)?\?[Qq]\?(.*)\?\=/m)
  if match
    charset = match[1]
    string = match[2].gsub(/_/, '=20')
    string = string.sub(/\=$/, '')
    str = Encodings::QuotedPrintable.decode(string)
    str = charset_encoder.encode(str, charset)
  end
  transcode_to_scrubbed_utf8(str)
rescue Encoding::UndefinedConversionError, ArgumentError, Encoding::ConverterNotFoundError
  # Fallback logic exposes the entire raw string if the charset is invalid
  warn "WARNING: Encoding conversion failed #{$!}"
  str.dup.force_encoding(Encoding::UTF_8)
end

Patched Implementation

def Utilities.q_value_decode(str)
  # Transition to gsub ensures global matching over the entire string
  # Non-greedy exclusion characters [^?] isolate individual token elements
  q_decoded = str.gsub(/=\?([^?]+)\?[Qq]\?((?:[^?]\|\?(?!\=))*)\?=/m) do |_match|
    charset = $1
    string  = $2.gsub(/_/, '=20').sub(/\=$/, '')
 
    unquoted_printable = Encodings::QuotedPrintable.decode(string)
    decoded = begin
                # Exception handling is localized to the matched token block
                charset_encoder.encode(unquoted_printable, charset)
              rescue Encoding::UndefinedConversionError, ArgumentError, Encoding::ConverterNotFoundError
                warn "WARNING: Encoding conversion failed #{$!}"
                unquoted_printable.dup.force_encoding(Encoding::UTF_8)
              end
 
    decoded.force_encoding(Encoding::UTF_8) if decoded.encoding == Encoding::ASCII_8BIT
    decoded
  end
 
  transcode_to_scrubbed_utf8(q_decoded)
end

The implementation of String#gsub combined with the character exclusion expression [^?]+ prevents the parser from matching across field delimiters. Localizing the rescue block guarantees that an encoding error in a single malformed token does not abort processing for the entire header.

Exploitation Methodology

An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by constructing custom, malformed headers where the From, To, or Reply-To parameters contain nested RFC 2047 blocks.

Step-by-Step Scenario

  1. The attacker drafts an email header containing a malformed charset definition: From: "John Doe" <=?UTF-8?Q?spoof?Q?agent?=@example.com>
  2. The Mail Transfer Agent (MTA) or security gateway processes the incoming message. It decodes the sequence strictly according to standards. It processes agent@example.com as the sender, executing validation checks (SPF/DKIM/DMARC) against example.com.
  3. The validated email is passed to the application backend, where the vulnerable mail gem parses the header string.
  4. The greedy regex capture identifies the string UTF-8?Q?spoof as the charset name. Attempting to transcode this invalid charset triggers a ConverterNotFoundError within q_value_decode.
  5. The rescue block triggers and returns the entire, raw unprocessed header value to the backend application.
  6. The downstream application parses the raw string and processes the sender as spoof?Q?agent@example.com, causing the backend logic to handle a different entity than what was validated by the gateway security layer.

Impact Assessment

The impact of CVE-2026-63435 is categorized as a partial breach of integrity. Although the vulnerability does not lead to remote code execution (RCE) or information disclosure directly from the host system, it bypasses key infrastructural defenses.

By leveraging the interpretation discrepancy, attackers can successfully execute spear-phishing campaigns that bypass SPF and DKIM validation check outcomes. This allows malicious actors to impersonate trusted domain administrators or vendors, dropping spoofed messages directly into end-user mailboxes or target processing queues.

Additionally, applications that automatically route incoming support tickets, notifications, or processes based on the parsed From address can be fooled into executing actions on behalf of privileged users, escalating the impact beyond simple identity spoofing.

Remediation and Mitigation

The primary resolution for this vulnerability is upgrading the underlying library dependencies to a non-vulnerable version.

Upgrading Dependencies

Update the library reference in your application's Gemfile to target version 2.9.1 or newer:

gem 'mail', '>= 2.9.1'

Execute Bundler to apply the update:

bundle update mail

Gateway Mitigations

In environments where upgrading the library is not immediately feasible, deploy ingress firewall rules or MTA filters on mail relays. These rules should scan for and reject email headers containing multiple embedded question marks inside the encoded-word parameters, or discard messages containing invalid, unparseable RFC 2047 character sets.

Official Patches

mikelGitHub Pull Request #1664: Fix header decoding logic and update regular expressions
mikelOfficial 2.9.1 Release Notes

Fix Analysis (1)

Technical Appendix

CVSS Score
5.3/ 10
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
EPSS Probability
0.33%
Top 75% most exploited

Affected Systems

Ruby on Rails applications utilizing 'mail' or 'actionmailer' dependenciesStandalone Ruby applications and scripts utilizing the 'mail' gem for parsing raw incoming emailsEmail processing pipelines and security filters running vulnerable gem versions

Affected Versions Detail

Product
Affected Versions
Fixed Version
mail (Ruby Gem)
mikel
< 2.9.12.9.1
AttributeDetail
CWE IDCWE-436
Attack VectorNetwork
CVSS Score5.3
EPSS Score0.00328
ImpactPartial Integrity (Bypass of Email Validation Frameworks)
Exploit StatusProof-of-Concept
KEV StatusNot Listed

MITRE ATT&CK Mapping

T1566Phishing
Initial Access
T1036Masquerading
Defense Evasion
CWE-436
Interpretation Conflict

An interpretation conflict occurs when two or more distinct components parse input in differing ways, leading to an inconsistency in the state or representation of the data.

Vulnerability Timeline

Initial decoding utility hardening commit authored
2026-05-07
Pull Request #1664 merged and version 2.9.1 released to Rubygems
2026-07-01
Vulnerability publicly disclosed and assigned CVE-2026-63435
2026-09-01

References & Sources

  • [1]GitHub Security Advisory: GHSA-mvxr-6m87-mv2q
  • [2]CVE.org Record - CVE-2026-63435
  • [3]NVD Vulnerability Detail - CVE-2026-63435

Attack Flow Diagram

Press enter or space to select a node. You can then use the arrow keys to move the node around. Press delete to remove it and escape to cancel.
Press enter or space to select an edge. You can then press delete to remove it or escape to cancel.

More Reports

•5 minutes ago•CVE-2026-62669
7.4

CVE-2026-62669: Critical Two-Factor Authentication Bypass in Grav CMS Login Plugin

CVE-2026-62669 is a critical Improper Authentication vulnerability (CWE-287) in the Grav Login Plugin for Grav CMS. Prior to version 3.8.11, the plugin's key rotation task failed to verify if a user session was fully authorized before regenerating and returning two-factor authentication (2FA) secrets. Consequently, an attacker possessing a victim's primary credentials could invoke this endpoint to replace the 2FA secret, retrieve the replacement, and bypass the MFA constraint entirely.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
0 views•8 min read
•about 2 hours ago•CVE-2026-63481
6.9

CVE-2026-63481: Sensitive Information Exposure in Hurl [Cookies] Redirection

Hurl version 8.0.1 and earlier contains a sensitive information exposure vulnerability during cross-origin HTTP redirections. Cookies defined via a dedicated [Cookies] parser block are carried into the redirected request, whereas standard raw Cookie headers are correctly stripped. This allows attackers to capture session credentials by redirecting Hurl clients to untrusted external hosts.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
3 views•6 min read
•about 3 hours ago•CVE-2026-63490
7.5

CVE-2026-63490: Path Traversal and Arbitrary File Disclosure in Handlebars.java

CVE-2026-63490 is a critical path traversal vulnerability in the Spring MVC integration of Handlebars.java. It allows unauthenticated remote attackers to bypass suffix validation and retrieve arbitrary system files via crafted dynamic view names.

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
2 views•5 min read
•about 3 hours ago•CVE-2026-4692
10.0

CVE-2026-4692: Sandbox Escape via Responsive Design Mode in Mozilla Firefox and Thunderbird

CVE-2026-4692 is a critical security vulnerability within the multi-process architecture of Mozilla Firefox, Firefox ESR, and Mozilla Thunderbird. It is classified as a sandbox escape residing in the Responsive Design Mode (RDM) component. Due to a missing authorization check during Inter-Process Communication (IPC) synchronization of BrowsingContext state, a compromised content process can unilaterally declare its top-level browsing context to be rendered in Responsive Design Mode. This state modification relaxes hit-test bounds restrictions, enabling the content process to dispatch synthesized touch events that target and trigger clicks within privileged browser UI (Chrome UI) elements. The exploitation of this vulnerability achieves complete sandbox escape and arbitrary code execution in the context of the parent process.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
3 views•6 min read
•about 4 hours ago•CVE-2026-65842
8.2

CVE-2026-65842: Server-Side Request Forgery with Response Disclosure in @platejs/docx-io

CVE-2026-65842 is a high-severity Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability with response disclosure in the @platejs/docx-io package of the Plate rich-text editor ecosystem. Prior to version 53.3.2, the library parsed HTML image tags and unconditionally fetched remote URL resources. Because the server-side response is subsequently encoded and compiled into the generated DOCX file, an attacker can extract sensitive internal data such as local API endpoints, private network configurations, or cloud instance metadata (IMDS) from the downloaded document structure.

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
3 views•6 min read
•about 4 hours ago•CVE-2026-2763
9.8

CVE-2026-2763: Use-After-Free in SpiderMonkey Generator for-in Loops

A critical use-after-free vulnerability exists in the SpiderMonkey JavaScript engine of Mozilla Firefox and Thunderbird. The flaw occurs when a generator object containing an active for-in loop is garbage-collected before the loop's iterator scope is finalized. This leaves a dangling pointer in the compartment's active enumerators list, allowing attackers to corrupt memory and execute arbitrary code.

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
3 views•6 min read