Sep 4, 2026·5 min read·17 visits
Missing authorization checks in SiYuan's publish-mode API endpoints allow unauthenticated attackers to discover database schemas and private block IDs across the entire workspace.
A security vulnerability in the SiYuan local-first personal knowledge management system allows unauthenticated remote attackers to bypass logical boundary controls in publish (read-only) mode. By interacting with endpoints that lack proper publish-access validation, an attacker can disclose the application's internal database schemas and harvest block IDs across both public and private notebooks. This metadata leakage compromises the confidentiality of restricted documents and provides foundational information for targeted extraction.
SiYuan is a local-first personal knowledge management application that supports a publish mode, also known as read-only mode. This configuration is designed to share specific public documents with web readers while keeping private, password-protected, or encrypted notebooks confidential. Secure implementation of this feature requires the application backend to enforce strict data-access scopes for all client-initiated queries.
An architectural authorization gap exists in versions prior to v3.7.4. The server fails to enforce publish-access validation on endpoints responsible for retrieving attribute view schemas and matching block definitions. Consequently, unprivileged remote users can cross the logical boundary separating public and private documents.
This vulnerability is classified under CWE-862 (Missing Authorization). The impact is limited to metadata and structured layout exposure, which is why it receives a CVSS v3.1 base score of 5.8. However, this exposure provides key layout parameters that can facilitate further structured information gathering.
The root cause is a failure to enforce the publish-access state (model.IsReadOnlyRoleContext) inside the business logic of specific backend APIs. This omission manifests across three distinct logical pathways in the application.
First, the /api/av/getAttributeViewKeysByID endpoint was implemented without routing through the model.CheckReadonly middleware in the server's API router. Because this middleware was omitted, unauthenticated read-only sessions could request structural database keys (avID) and retrieve descriptions, column definitions, and template vocabularies for any database.
Second, the /api/block/getBlockDefIDsByRefText endpoint was programmed to query and return block definition IDs matching a given anchor search text without verifying whether the source documents were designated as public. The function model.GetBlockDefIDsByRefText processed raw queries against the database and directly returned all matched IDs.
Third, navigation and metadata endpoints such as getBlockTreeInfos, getBlockSiblingID, and getBlockRelevantIDs blind-queried internal model helpers without validating that the targeted block ID resided inside the active user's allowed publish context. These combined flaws allowed complete block-ID mapping of private notebooks.
The remediation implemented in SiYuan v3.7.4 introduces robust validation checkpoints in the file kernel/api/block.go and updates the HTTP router in kernel/api/router.go.
In the patched version, block traversal endpoints extract the target notebook (boxID) and validate the block ID's accessibility in read-only mode using isBlockPublishAccessible. The following code snippet demonstrates the authorization logic added to block APIs:
// Patched logic ensuring publish authorization gates
func checkBlockPublishAccessInBox(c *gin.Context, id, boxID string, ret *gulu.Result) bool {
if isBlockPublishAccessible(c, id, boxID) {
return true
}
ret.Code = -1
ret.Msg = "not found"
return false
}
func isBlockPublishAccessible(c *gin.Context, id, boxID string) bool {
if !model.IsReadOnlyRoleContext(c) {
return true
}
return model.CheckBlockIdAccessableByPublishAccessInBox(c, model.GetPublishAccess(), id, boxID)
}Additionally, the reference text querying logic was patched to sanitize the list of returned matching IDs using the filterBlockIDsByPublishAccess function. This prevents unauthenticated users from obtaining block IDs from unauthorized paths:
func getBlockDefIDsByRefText(c *gin.Context) {
// ... payload parsing ...
anchor := arg["anchor"].(string)
ids := model.GetBlockDefIDsByRefText(anchor)
ids = filterBlockIDsByPublishAccess(c, ids, "") // Filter unexposed block IDs
// ... response building ...
}Finally, the API routing configuration in kernel/api/router.go was updated to explicitly include the missing model.CheckReadonly middleware for the attribute view schema retrieval endpoint, preventing unauthorized API interaction:
// Router configuration fix
ginServer.Handle("POST", "/api/av/getAttributeViewKeysByID", model.CheckAuth, model.CheckReadonly, getAttributeViewKeysByID)Exploitation of CVE-2026-72800 does not require authentication or user interaction. An attacker leverages standard HTTP POST requests to discover schema structures and enumerate valid block IDs.
To construct an ID-enumeration oracle, the attacker sends a POST request targeting /api/block/getBlockDefIDsByRefText with a generic search parameter, such as {"anchor": "confidential"}. The vulnerable server queries the global workspace database and returns a JSON array of matching block IDs, regardless of whether they belong to published notebooks or encrypted offline files.
Once the attacker possesses a target block ID, they query /api/av/getAttributeViewKeysByID to harvest structural layouts, database keys, template setups, and metadata columns. Because the middleware checks were omitted, the backend returns the database's schema layout, exposing sensitive structural properties.
The security impact of CVE-2026-72800 is a partial loss of confidentiality. Because the vulnerability only exposes structural properties (such as schemas, template parameters, and block identifiers) rather than full document content, the overall impact is limited.
However, the leakage of block IDs across the entire workspace breaks the logical partition between public and private documents. An attacker can use these harvested IDs to confirm the existence of confidential projects, analyze internal documentation structures, and build relationships between private notes.
This structural exposure serves as a reconnaissance step. An attacker can combine these enumerated identifiers with other potential application flaws or access controls to target specific, unmapped assets within the SiYuan deployment.
The recommended remediation is to upgrade the SiYuan application deployment to version v3.7.4 or later. This release enforces authorization boundaries across all affected endpoints and binds the required middleware filters.
If upgrading immediately is not possible, security administrators should implement temporary mitigation strategies. Access to administrative and data APIs can be restricted by configuring an upstream reverse proxy (such as Nginx, Apache, or Cloudflare) to block incoming external requests to specific URL prefixes:
# Example block for critical metadata endpoints at the reverse proxy
location /api/av/getAttributeViewKeysByID {
deny all;
}
location /api/block/getBlockDefIDsByRefText {
deny all;
}Additionally, security teams should audit their active network logs for high volumes of POST requests to /api/block/getBlockDefIDsByRefText and /api/av/ endpoints, which may indicate automated exploitation attempts.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N| Product | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|
SiYuan siyuan-note | < 3.7.4 | 3.7.4 |
| Attribute | Detail |
|---|---|
| CWE ID | CWE-862 (Missing Authorization) |
| Attack Vector | Network (Unauthenticated) |
| CVSS v3.1 Score | 5.8 (Medium) |
| CVSS v4.0 Score | 6.9 (Medium) |
| EPSS Score | 0.00237 |
| EPSS Percentile | 14.51% |
| Exploit Status | poc |
| CISA KEV Status | Not Listed |
The software does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.
A path traversal vulnerability (CWE-22) in Contao CMS allows unauthenticated remote attackers to bypass directory boundary restrictions in ImagesController and access files within the project directory.
Contao Open Source CMS versions 4.0.0 through 5.3.49 and 5.4.0-RC1 through 5.7.11 contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in backend parameter handling. The `RequestTokenListener` component validates anti-CSRF tokens solely for HTTP POST requests, while GET-based declarative guards run only when an `act` parameter is present in the query string. Consequently, custom backend actions dispatched via alternative parameters such as `key=` can execute without CSRF token verification when triggered by an authenticated user.
Contao CMS versions 4.1.0 through 5.3.49 and 5.4.0-RC1 through 5.7.11 fail to validate form submission tokens and enforce rate limiting when processing activation email resend requests via HTTP POST, enabling resource exhaustion and account state enumeration.
An information disclosure vulnerability in Contao CMS allows unauthenticated site visitors to view protected page titles, URLs, and text excerpts through search queries when protected page indexing is disabled after previously being enabled.
In Vikunja prior to version 2.6.0, relation creation via the CalDAV endpoint fails to invoke the TaskRelation.CanCreate authorization check. This missing access control allows an authenticated user to establish unauthorized relationships and perform write operations against any task, provided its unique identifier (UID) is known.
A cross-project information disclosure vulnerability in Vikunja allows authenticated users with read access to one project to view private task details from unauthorized projects via subtask expansion parameters.