CVEReports
CVEReports

Automated vulnerability intelligence platform. Comprehensive reports for high-severity CVEs generated by AI.

Product

  • Home
  • Sitemap
  • RSS Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2026 CVEReports. All rights reserved.

Made with love by Amit Schendel & Alon Barad



CVE-2026-73974

CVE-2026-73974: Local Path Traversal and Privilege Escalation in Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
Software Engineer

Aug 18, 2026·5 min read·3 visits

Executive Summary (TL;DR)

A local path traversal flaw in the testing parameters of Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins allows unprivileged users to read sensitive files as root.

CVE-2026-73974 is a local path traversal vulnerability in linuxfabrik-lib and Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins. Under standard monitoring configurations running with elevated privileges via sudo, this flaw can be exploited by an unprivileged local user to read arbitrary root-only files, resulting in local privilege escalation.

Vulnerability Overview

CVE-2026-73974 is a directory traversal and improper privilege management vulnerability affecting the Linuxfabrik monitoring ecosystem. This ecosystem includes the Python-based utility library linuxfabrik-lib and its corresponding suite of check plugins. These plugins are commonly integrated into enterprise monitoring frameworks such as Nagios, Icinga, or Sensu.

Under standard monitoring configurations, plugins frequently require elevated privileges to read low-level hardware or system configurations. To facilitate this, administrators regularly configure passwordless sudo access for the dedicated, unprivileged monitoring service accounts, such as nagios or icinga.

An unprivileged local user who has compromised the monitoring service account can leverage a hidden, production-accessible parameter named --test. By supplying a malformed input containing traversal sequences or absolute paths to this parameter, the root-privileged plugin can be forced to disclose the contents of arbitrary restricted files, leading to complete local privilege escalation.

Root Cause Analysis

The root cause of the vulnerability lies in insecure input handling and path resolution within the testing harness library helper lib.lftest.test(). This function was designed to ingest a mock file parameter via the --test command-line flag and simulate output streams during automated testing or validation environments.

When the utility received a file path via --test, it invoked the native Python method os.path.isfile() to confirm the path resolved to a valid file on disk. Upon confirmation, it read the file using the internal disk.read_file() method. This design failed to implement directory containment verification, making it susceptible to path traversal.

In addition to the shared library helper flaw, specific plugins directly interacted with the local file system using the command line arguments without sanitization. The network-bonding plugin directly invoked Python's native open() method on the string provided via --test. Similarly, the openstack-swift-stat plugin leveraged lib.disk.read_file() directly, bypassing the common library testing logic entirely.

A tertiary vulnerability exists within the SQLite database utility helper db_sqlite.py. The get_db_path() function constructed paths using caller-controlled database names. Because it lacked sanity checks to restrict inputs to base file names, path traversal markers like .. could be used to manipulate database files outside of the designated secured directory.

Code and Patch Deep-Dive

The fix for CVE-2026-73974 was implemented by modifying db_sqlite.py and lftest.py in linuxfabrik-lib to enforce strict containment. In db_sqlite.py, the get_db_path() function now explicitly rejects any database filenames that are not plain basenames. This prevents attackers from traversing out of the hardened directories.

The lftest.py library helper was restructured to route all reads through a new private function _read_fixture(). This helper anchors path resolution to the actual location of the running plugin script using sys.argv[0] rather than the current working directory, which is attacker-controlled. The path is then canonicalized using os.path.realpath() and validated to ensure it resides within the safe <plugin_dir>/unit-test/ directory.

The following diagram illustrates the path resolution flow before and after the application of the patch:

Exploitation Methodology

An exploitation scenario requires an attacker to have established local shell access with the privileges of a monitoring service user, such as nagios. The attacker first audits the sudo permissions to identify which Linuxfabrik plugins are whitelisted for passwordless sudo execution.

Upon identifying a whitelisted plugin, such as /usr/lib/nagios/plugins/deb-updates, the attacker invokes the binary under sudo while passing the target file path through the --test parameter. For example, executing sudo deb-updates --test /etc/shadow,1 forces the root-privileged process to read /etc/shadow.

Because the unpatched plugin handles the --test argument as a path to mock standard output or standard error results, the library parses the file and outputs its contents to the console. The attacker can then extract system password hashes, private SSH keys, or administrative configuration files.

Remediation and Detection

Immediate remediation requires updating the linuxfabrik-lib package to version 6.1.0 or 6.0.1. Simultaneously, the Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins package must be updated to version 7.0.0 or later. These versions incorporate the strict basename and directory containment checks.

If patching cannot be performed immediately, temporary workarounds must be applied. Administrators should review /etc/sudoers files to ensure that monitoring plugins are not granted wildcards or permissive invocation privileges. Wherever possible, restrict write permissions to the plugin installation directories to prevent low-privileged users from tampering with files.

Intrusion detection can be achieved by monitoring host audits and shell history logs. Security teams should deploy auditd rules or SIEM detection patterns that trigger alerts when system monitoring accounts execute commands containing the --test parameter in conjunction with path traversal characters or sensitive directory paths like /etc/ or /root/.

Official Patches

Linuxfabriklinuxfabrik-lib containment fix
Linuxfabrikmonitoring-plugins integration fix

Fix Analysis (2)

Technical Appendix

CVSS Score
5.5/ 10
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Affected Systems

linuxfabrik-libLinuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins

Affected Versions Detail

Product
Affected Versions
Fixed Version
linuxfabrik-lib
Linuxfabrik
< 6.1.06.1.0
monitoring-plugins
Linuxfabrik
< 7.0.07.0.0
AttributeDetail
CWE IDCWE-22 / CWE-269
Attack VectorLocal
CVSS5.5
EPSSN/A
ImpactLocal Privilege Escalation
Exploit StatusPoC
KEV StatusNot Listed

MITRE ATT&CK Mapping

T1083File and Directory Discovery
Discovery
T1005Data from Local System
Collection
T1068Exploitation for Privilege Escalation
Privilege Escalation
CWE-22
Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')

Vulnerability Timeline

Security patches committed to Linuxfabrik/lib and Linuxfabrik/monitoring-plugins
2026-07-08
Joint security advisory published and CVE-2026-73974 assigned
2026-08-18

References & Sources

  • [1]GHSA-rh9c-rqvg-f7pr Security Advisory
  • [2]linuxfabrik-lib v6.1.0 Release Notes
  • [3]Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins v7.0.0 Release Notes

Attack Flow Diagram

Press enter or space to select a node. You can then use the arrow keys to move the node around. Press delete to remove it and escape to cancel.
Press enter or space to select an edge. You can then press delete to remove it or escape to cancel.

More Reports

•14 minutes ago•CVE-2026-17106
7.1

CVE-2026-17106: Container-to-Host Arbitrary File Write in moby/go-archive (CopyEscape)

CVE-2026-17106 (CopyEscape) is a container-to-host arbitrary file-write vulnerability within Docker's archiving and extraction library moby/go-archive. By utilizing a Time-of-Check to Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) race condition during the file-walking stage inside a running container, a malicious container process can force the host engine to produce a compromised tar stream. During client-side extraction, the Docker CLI resolves directory entries through absolute symbolic links, resulting in arbitrary file creation or modification on the host system.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
1 views•6 min read
•about 2 hours ago•CVE-2026-71417
7.3

CVE-2026-71417: Authorization Bypass Leading to Unauthorized TLS Certificate Revocation in Netflix Lemur

CVE-2026-71417 is an authorization bypass vulnerability (CWE-639) in Netflix Lemur, an open-source TLS certificate management framework. In versions prior to 1.9.3, a low-privileged authenticated user can bypass role and certificate-level permission boundaries to revoke arbitrary managed TLS certificates at the upstream Certificate Authority (CA). This vulnerability stems from an architectural issue where Lemur evaluates authorization against internal database row ownership rather than the unique, cryptographic identity of the certificate. An attacker can exploit this flaw by uploading a duplicate record of a target certificate and requesting its revocation, triggering a downstream CA-side revocation and a subsequent denial-of-service (DoS) condition for services relying on the target certificate.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
5 views•6 min read
•about 3 hours ago•CVE-2026-68927
3.0

CVE-2026-68927: Server-Side Request Forgery Port Restriction Bypass in Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) prior to version 4.5.1. The flaw occurs in the Android App Link validation process, where a split-validation vulnerability allows an authenticated attacker to perform port restriction bypasses and potential DNS rebinding attacks against internal infrastructure.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
4 views•7 min read
•about 4 hours ago•CVE-2026-68923
6.5

CVE-2026-68923: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)

CVE-2026-68923 describes a critical security regression in the Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) where vital security middleware, including Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) validation, clickjacking protection, and standard HTTP security controls, was deactivated. The vulnerability arose from a partial migration of Django's middleware settings, which silently omitted security-critical components while preserving legacy definitions. Authenticated sessions on vulnerable instances were left exposed to arbitrary administrative state modifications initiated via cross-site vectors.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
4 views•6 min read
•about 5 hours ago•CVE-2026-68922
5.5

CVE-2026-68922: Arbitrary File Read via Path Traversal in MobSF ZIP/APK Icon Extraction

CVE-2026-68922 is a path traversal vulnerability in Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) prior to version 4.5.1. The vulnerability exists within the Android icon extraction process when analyzing uploaded ZIP or APK archives, allowing an authenticated attacker to read arbitrary files from the server.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
5 views•6 min read
•about 6 hours ago•CVE-2026-61634
0.0

CVE-2026-61634: Heap Memory Exhaustion in RabbitMQ Java Client

An improper input validation vulnerability (CWE-20) in the RabbitMQ Java Client prior to version 5.33.0 allows a compromised or malicious AMQP broker to trigger heap memory exhaustion and Denial of Service in client applications during the connection handshake.

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
4 views•7 min read