CVEReports
CVEReports

Automated vulnerability intelligence platform. Comprehensive reports for high-severity CVEs generated by AI.

Product

  • Home
  • Sitemap
  • RSS Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2026 CVEReports. All rights reserved.

Made with love by Amit Schendel & Alon Barad



GHSA-7M8F-HGJQ-8GC9

GHSA-7M8F-HGJQ-8GC9: Pre-Authentication Denial of Service via Insecure Deserialization Order in aiosend

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
Senior Security Researcher

May 22, 2026·6 min read·6 visits

Executive Summary (TL;DR)

Pre-auth DoS in aiosend < 3.0.6 due to full Pydantic JSON deserialization occurring prior to HMAC signature verification on webhook endpoints.

The aiosend library prior to version 3.0.6 contains a pre-authentication Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability in its webhook handling mechanism. The software processes and deserializes incoming JSON payloads before verifying the cryptographic signature, allowing unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server CPU and memory resources by sending large, complex payloads.

Vulnerability Overview

The aiosend Python package provides webhook handling capabilities for applications interacting with external APIs. Versions prior to 3.0.6 contain a severe design flaw in the request processing pipeline. The software processes and deserializes incoming JSON payloads before verifying the cryptographic authenticity of the request.

This architectural inversion allows unauthenticated attackers to force the application to perform computationally expensive operations. The vulnerability resides specifically in the WebhookHandler.feed_update() method within the aiosend/webhook/base.py module. Attackers exploit this component by sending arbitrarily large or complex JSON payloads to the exposed webhook endpoint.

The vulnerability is classified as CWE-400 (Uncontrolled Resource Consumption). Successful exploitation results in a Denial of Service (DoS) condition. The application will exhaust CPU and memory resources processing malicious input, leading to service degradation or complete unavailability for legitimate requests.

Root Cause Analysis

The vulnerability stems from an insecure sequence of operations in the webhook processing logic. When an HTTP request arrives, the feed_update() method immediately invokes Pydantic's model_validate() function on the raw request body. This operation parses the JSON string into Python objects and performs deep type validation across the nested data structures.

Crucially, the application only calls the _check_signature() method to verify the HMAC signature after the model_validate() operation completely finishes. If the signature is invalid, the application correctly drops the request and returns a 403 status. However, the computational cost of parsing the untrusted payload has already been incurred by the server.

An aggravating configuration factor exacerbates this parsing overhead. The CryptoPayObject class, defined in aiosend/types/base.py, is initialized with ConfigDict(extra="allow"). This specific Pydantic configuration instructs the parser to accept and store any arbitrary, undeclared fields present in the JSON payload.

Consequently, the parser will allocate memory and process massive volumes of extraneous data injected by an attacker. Because the library does not enforce a maximum body size for incoming webhooks by default, the resource consumption scales directly with the attacker's payload size.

Code Analysis

The vulnerable implementation in aiosend/webhook/base.py clearly demonstrates the authorization bypass logic. The input string is passed directly into the data model validation routine before any security checks execute.

# Vulnerable implementation in aiosend/webhook/base.py (Prior to 3.0.6)
def feed_update(self, body: bytes, headers: dict):
    # Parsing occurs first, consuming CPU and memory
    update = Update.model_validate(body, context={"client": self})
 
    # Authentication occurs too late in the execution flow
    if not self._check_signature(body, headers):
        return False
 
    # ... further processing ...

The patched implementation in version 3.0.6 corrects the operational sequence. The _check_signature function acts as a guard clause, executing strictly before any resource-intensive data processing occurs.

# Patched implementation in aiosend/webhook/base.py (v3.0.6)
def feed_update(self, body: bytes, headers: dict):
    # Authentication acts as a strict guard clause
    if not self._check_signature(body, headers):
        return False
 
    # Parsing only occurs for authenticated, trusted payloads
    update = Update.model_validate(body, context={"client": self})
 
    # ... further processing ...

This structural change ensures the application rejects unauthenticated requests with minimal CPU cycles. The asynchronous event loop remains unblocked, and unauthorized payloads are discarded before significant memory allocation occurs.

Exploitation Mechanics

Exploiting this vulnerability requires sending HTTP POST requests to the application's webhook endpoint. The attacker constructs a JSON payload containing thousands of extraneous key-value pairs or deeply nested objects. The payload size is constrained only by the underlying web server limits, which often default to several megabytes.

The attacker deliberately omits or invalidates the HMAC signature headers. Upon receiving the request, the application routes the payload to WebhookHandler.feed_update(). The Pydantic model parser attempts to validate the massive structure, blocking the asynchronous event loop or consuming a worker thread during the operation.

Proof-of-Concept testing demonstrates linear degradation in performance based on payload size and complexity. Processing a standard 336-byte payload requires approximately 26 microseconds. Injecting 10,000 extra fields (a 5.3 MB payload) increases processing time to 7,490 microseconds (7.5 milliseconds) per request.

Extra FieldsBody SizeParse TimeStatus
0336 B26 µs403 REJECTED
1,00082 KB257 µs403 REJECTED
5,000410 KB1,183 µs403 REJECTED
10,000820 KB2,552 µs403 REJECTED
10,000 (×512B)5.3 MB7,490 µs403 REJECTED

An attacker orchestrating a flood of these requests concurrently will saturate the available worker threads or stall the async event loop. Legitimate requests will queue and eventually time out, resulting in a complete Denial of Service.

Impact Assessment

The vulnerability allows unauthenticated, remote attackers to degrade or disable the affected application. Because the flaw exists in the initial request handling layer, no specific configuration or prior access is necessary. The application merely needs to expose the webhook endpoint to the network.

The CVSS v3.1 vector is CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H, resulting in a High severity score of 7.5. The attack complexity is low, and the attack vector is network-based. The primary impact is entirely concentrated on the availability metric.

Applications lacking strict request body size limits at the reverse proxy or WAF layer face the highest risk. The arbitrary field parsing via ConfigDict(extra="allow") guarantees that memory consumption will scale directly with the attacker's payload size. Sustained exploitation leads directly to Out-of-Memory (OOM) process termination by the operating system.

Remediation and Mitigation

The primary remediation strategy requires updating the aiosend library to version 3.0.6 or later. This release restructures the feed_update method to perform signature verification strictly before executing Pydantic's model_validate. Developers must review their dependency lockfiles to ensure the updated version is actively deployed.

In environments where immediate patching is unfeasible, administrators can deploy interim mitigations using a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or reverse proxy. Configuring Nginx, HAProxy, or a cloud WAF to restrict the client_max_body_size for specific webhook URIs significantly reduces the attack surface. Limiting payloads to a reasonable size prevents the most severe CPU and memory exhaustion scenarios.

Application developers should implement framework-level middleware to enforce strict Content-Length limits on webhook routes. Frameworks like FastAPI, Aiohttp, and Flask allow developers to intercept requests and reject oversized payloads before they reach the application logic layer.

Official Patches

vovchic17Official Security Advisory

Technical Appendix

CVSS Score
7.5/ 10
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Affected Systems

aiosend Python packageApplications utilizing aiosend for webhook processing

Affected Versions Detail

Product
Affected Versions
Fixed Version
aiosend
vovchic17
< 3.0.63.0.6
AttributeDetail
Vulnerability TypePre-auth Denial of Service (DoS)
CWE IDCWE-400 (Uncontrolled Resource Consumption)
CVSS v3.1 Score7.5 (High)
Attack VectorNetwork
Authentication RequiredNone
Affected Componentaiosend/webhook/base.py
Exploit StatusPoC Available

MITRE ATT&CK Mapping

T1499Endpoint Denial of Service
Impact
T1190Exploit Public-Facing Application
Initial Access
CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

The software does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource, thereby enabling an attacker to cause a denial of service.

Vulnerability Timeline

Vulnerability published in GitHub Advisory Database
2026-05-22

References & Sources

  • [1]GitHub Advisory Database: GHSA-7M8F-HGJQ-8GC9
  • [2]aiosend Security Advisory
  • [3]aiosend Repository

Attack Flow Diagram

Press enter or space to select a node. You can then use the arrow keys to move the node around. Press delete to remove it and escape to cancel.
Press enter or space to select an edge. You can then press delete to remove it or escape to cancel.

More Reports

•about 2 hours ago•CVE-2024-29203
4.3

CVE-2024-29203: Client-Side Cross-Site Scripting via Unsandboxed Iframes and Legacy Embed Elements in TinyMCE

CVE-2024-29203 identifies a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the content ingestion and parsing mechanics of TinyMCE rich text editor. Due to a failure to enforce sandbox attributes on dynamic iframe elements and safely handle legacy embed objects, unauthenticated attackers can inject malicious elements that execute scripts within the context of the parent application session.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
4 views•5 min read
•about 4 hours ago•CVE-2026-9277
8.1

CVE-2026-9277: OS Command Injection in shell-quote via Object-Token Line Terminator Parsing Defect

A technical breakdown of the OS command injection vulnerability in the shell-quote NPM package (CVE-2026-9277 / GHSA-w7jw-789q-3m8p). The bug resides in the character-by-character backslash-escaping logic applied to the .op field of object-tokens within the quote() function, which fails to match and escape line terminators due to a regex matching oversight in JavaScript. This allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary shell commands if they can control inputs processed by this library.

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
7 views•6 min read
•about 5 hours ago•CVE-2026-11645
8.8

CVE-2026-11645: Out-of-Bounds Memory Access in Google Chrome V8 Engine

A high-severity memory corruption vulnerability exists in the V8 JavaScript engine of Google Chrome before versions 149.0.7827.102/103. The flaw arises from an incorrect bounds-check elimination during JIT compilation by the TurboFan optimizer, allowing remote attackers to achieve out-of-bounds read and write access inside the sandboxed renderer process.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
21 views•6 min read
•about 14 hours ago•CVE-2026-50751
9.3

CVE-2026-50751: Authentication Bypass in Check Point Security Gateway IKEv1 Legacy Validation

An improper authentication vulnerability (CWE-287) exists in the legacy, deprecated Internet Key Exchange version 1 (IKEv1) key exchange protocol implementation in Check Point Security Gateways. The vulnerability is caused by a logic flow weakness during the certificate validation process for Remote Access VPN and Mobile Access (SSL VPN) connections. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this weakness to bypass user authentication entirely, establishing a fully functional Remote Access VPN connection without a valid password.

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
66 views•6 min read
•1 day ago•CVE-2026-39922
6.3

CVE-2026-39922: Server-Side Request Forgery in GeoNode Service Registration Endpoint

GeoNode versions prior to 4.4.5 and 5.0.2 are vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the service registration endpoint. Authenticated attackers with low privileges can exploit insufficient input validation in the Web Map Service (WMS) registration module to force the application server to make outbound network queries to loopback addresses, private RFC1918 subnets, link-local scopes, and cloud metadata endpoints. This technical report details the mechanics of the vulnerability, the underlying architectural flaw, and how to effectively remediate and mitigate the associated security risks.

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
4 views•7 min read
•1 day ago•CVE-2022-0492
7.8

CVE-2022-0492: Privilege Escalation and Container Escape via cgroups v1 release_agent

CVE-2022-0492 is a high-severity missing authorization vulnerability in the Linux kernel's Control Groups (cgroups) v1 implementation. The flaw resides within the cgroup_release_agent_write function in kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c, where the kernel fails to validate if the process writing to the release_agent file possesses administrative capabilities in the initial user namespace. This allows a local attacker inside a container with root privileges (UID 0) to abuse user namespaces, mount a cgroups v1 directory, modify the release_agent parameter, and execute arbitrary commands on the host system as host root, effectively achieving a complete container escape.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
12 views•7 min read