Feb 10, 2026·6 min read·79 visits
SandboxJS failed to persist security tags when objects were placed into array literals. Attackers could wrap a global object (like `Array.prototype`) in an array, retrieve it, and receive a 'clean' reference, allowing them to pollute the host environment.
A critical sandbox escape vulnerability in `@nyariv/sandboxjs` allows malicious code to bypass the 'isGlobal' protection flag by laundering host references through array literals. This seemingly innocuous action strips security metadata, granting attackers write access to critical host prototypes (CWE-1321) and leading to potential Remote Code Execution (RCE).
JavaScript sandboxing is like trying to hold water in a sieve. The language is so dynamic, so mutable, and so interconnected that creating a truly isolated environment is a Herculean task. @nyariv/sandboxjs attempts this by parsing and executing JS in a controlled scope, wrapping objects to track permissions. The goal is simple: let users run untrusted code without burning down the server.
However, the library relies on a concept called 'taint tracking'—specifically, an isGlobal flag attached to wrappers around sensitive host objects (like window, process, or Array.prototype). If isGlobal is true, the sandbox blocks write access. It's a 'Do Not Touch' sticker on the museum exhibits.
The problem with stickers is that they fall off if you handle the merchandise too much. In CVE-2026-25881, we found a way to peel that sticker off simply by putting the object in a box and taking it back out.
The vulnerability lies in how the sandbox handles intermediate values, specifically Array Literals. When the sandbox executes code, it wraps every object in a Prop class. This class holds the isGlobal boolean. If you try to access Array.prototype directly, the sandbox hands you a wrapper with isGlobal: true.
Here is where the logic breaks down. When you define an array literal like [Array.prototype], the sandbox's CreateArray operation extracts the raw value from the wrapper to populate the new array. It effectively says, 'Okay, you want an array containing this object? Here is the object.' It forgets to attach the 'Do Not Touch' note to the array's internal storage of that object.
When you subsequently access that index (e.g., arr[0]), the sandbox creates a new wrapper for the retrieved value. Since the retrieval didn't come from a known global lookup (it just came from some random array), the new wrapper defaults to isGlobal: false. The object has been 'laundered'. It is now a clean, writable reference to the host's actual Array.prototype.
The root cause was a philosophical error in the code: trusting the path of access rather than the identity of the object. The fix introduced in version 0.8.31 completely shifts this paradigm.
The Vulnerable Logic (Conceptual):
// Old way: Relying on metadata passing
function getProperty(obj, key) {
const value = obj[key];
// If obj was a random array, we assume 'value' is safe.
return new Prop(value, { isGlobal: false });
}The Fix (Identity Check):
The patch introduces a helper getGlobalProp that runs on every property access. It checks the value itself against a list of known dangerous globals.
// src/executor.ts
function getGlobalProp(val: unknown, context: IExecContext, prop?: Prop) {
if (!val) return;
// CRITICAL: Check if the value IS the global object
if (val === globalThis) {
return new Prop({ [p]: context.ctx.sandboxGlobal }, p, prop?.isConst, false, prop?.isVariable);
}
// Check if value is a known host function or prototype
const e = isFunc && context.evals.get(val);
if (e) {
// FORCE the protection flag back on
return new Prop({ [p]: e }, p, prop?.isConst, true, prop?.isVariable);
}
}By validating the identity of val against the context's allowlist (context.evals), the sandbox re-applies the handcuffs even if the object was laundered through a dozen arrays.
Exploiting this is embarrassingly simple. We don't need complex heap manipulation or race conditions. We just need to move an object from Point A to Point B.
The Attack Chain:
Array.prototype is perfect because it's available everywhere.Array definition for the entire host process.The PoC:
// Inside the sandbox
const laundryBasket = [Array.prototype];
const cleanShirt = laundryBasket[0]; // The 'isGlobal' flag is gone now
// Add a property to the actual host Array prototype
cleanShirt.polluted = "I am in your walls";
// Verification (in Host)
// console.log([].polluted) -> "I am in your walls"If the host application later runs code like const cmd = userOptions.cmd || 'default', and we've polluted Object.prototype to inject a malicious command, we achieve Remote Code Execution.
Why is this rated Critical (9.1)? Because SandboxJS is often used to run user-submitted scripts in SaaS platforms, rule engines, or plugin systems. Breaking out of the sandbox destroys the security model entirely.
Once an attacker has Prototype Pollution on the host, they can usually escalate to RCE. Common patterns include:
outputFunctionName in EJS).shell or env options passed to child_process.exec or spawn.toString or valueOf to throw errors or enter infinite loops.This isn't just a data leak; it's full server compromise if the host application uses any standard libraries vulnerable to pollution gadgets.
The remediation is straightforward: Update to version 0.8.31.
The patch forces the sandbox to be paranoid. It no longer trusts that a value is safe just because it came from a safe place. It checks the ID card of every object, every time it is accessed.
If you cannot update immediately, you are essentially running code on the host with extra steps. A temporary mitigation (though ugly) would be to freeze all prototypes in the host environment before starting the sandbox:
// Host-side mitigation
Object.freeze(Object.prototype);
Object.freeze(Array.prototype);
// ... repeat for all built-insThis might break other dependencies, but it stops the bleeding until you can patch.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H| Product | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|
@nyariv/sandboxjs nyariv | < 0.8.31 | 0.8.31 |
| Attribute | Detail |
|---|---|
| CWE ID | CWE-1321 |
| CWE Name | Prototype Pollution |
| CVSS Score | 9.1 (Critical) |
| Attack Vector | Network (AV:N) |
| Exploit Maturity | PoC Available |
| Impact | Sandbox Escape / RCE |
Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution')
Contao Open Source CMS versions 4.0.0 through 5.3.49 and 5.4.0-RC1 through 5.7.11 contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in backend parameter handling. The `RequestTokenListener` component validates anti-CSRF tokens solely for HTTP POST requests, while GET-based declarative guards run only when an `act` parameter is present in the query string. Consequently, custom backend actions dispatched via alternative parameters such as `key=` can execute without CSRF token verification when triggered by an authenticated user.
Contao CMS versions 4.1.0 through 5.3.49 and 5.4.0-RC1 through 5.7.11 fail to validate form submission tokens and enforce rate limiting when processing activation email resend requests via HTTP POST, enabling resource exhaustion and account state enumeration.
An information disclosure vulnerability in Contao CMS allows unauthenticated site visitors to view protected page titles, URLs, and text excerpts through search queries when protected page indexing is disabled after previously being enabled.
In Vikunja prior to version 2.6.0, relation creation via the CalDAV endpoint fails to invoke the TaskRelation.CanCreate authorization check. This missing access control allows an authenticated user to establish unauthorized relationships and perform write operations against any task, provided its unique identifier (UID) is known.
A cross-project information disclosure vulnerability in Vikunja allows authenticated users with read access to one project to view private task details from unauthorized projects via subtask expansion parameters.
An information disclosure vulnerability in Vikunja allows authenticated users with read access to a task to expose private email addresses of assigned users through the API task assignees endpoint due to an unmasked database query.