Feb 24, 2026·5 min read·71 visits
Unauthenticated DoS in GoFiber v3 via the `fiber_flash` cookie. A 5-byte payload triggers an 85GB memory allocation, crashing the server instantly. Fixed in v3.1.0.
GoFiber v3, a framework renowned for its blistering speed, fell victim to a critical Denial of Service vulnerability rooted in its handling of flash messages. By sending a specially crafted 'fiber_flash' cookie containing just 10 hex characters, an unauthenticated attacker could trick the server into attempting an 85GB memory allocation, triggering an immediate crash.
GoFiber loves speed. It's built on top of fasthttp, bypassing Go's standard library to squeeze every microsecond out of request processing. But in the race for performance, safety sometimes gets left in the dust. Enter the fiber_flash cookie, a mechanism designed to pass temporary messages between requests (like "Login Successful").
Here is the kicker: in GoFiber v3, this logic was baked into the core requestHandler. It didn't matter if your application actually used flash messages. It didn't matter if you disabled every optional middleware. Before your router even looked at the URL, before your auth middleware checked the headers, the framework was eagerly digging through cookies looking for fiber_flash.
It’s the digital equivalent of a stranger walking into your house and opening your fridge before you’ve even unlocked the front door. If that stranger brings a specific, malformed packet of data, they don't just eat your food—they burn the house down.
The vulnerability (CVE-2026-25899) is a textbook case of CWE-789: Memory Allocation with Excessive Size Value. It stems from how GoFiber handles—or rather, mishandles—deserialization using the tinylib/msgp library.
MessagePack (MsgPack) is a binary serialization format that is faster and smaller than JSON. When encoding an array, MsgPack uses a header to declare the number of elements. For example, 0x93 means "Array with 3 elements." The deserializer reads this header and prepares to read 3 objects.
The flaw lay in the auto-generated code's blind trust. It read the array size header and immediately allocated memory to hold that many elements, without checking if the input buffer actually contained enough data to fill them. It’s like a contractor ordering materials to build a skyscraper because a client wrote "100 floors" on a napkin, without checking if the client actually had the budget (or the land) for it.
Let's look at the generated code in redirect_msgp.go. This is where the magic (and the crash) happens. The UnmarshalMsg method is responsible for turning bytes back into a struct.
// The Vulnerable Logic in GoFiber v3 < 3.1.0
func (z *redirectionMsgs) UnmarshalMsg(bts []byte) (o []byte, err error) {
var zb0002 uint32
// 1. Read the array size from the wire (attacker controlled!)
zb0002, bts, err = msgp.ReadArrayHeaderBytes(bts)
if err != nil {
return
}
// 2. THE BUG: Blind allocation
// If the attacker says zb0002 is 2 billion, we allocate 2 billion structs.
if cap((*z)) >= int(zb0002) {
(*z) = (*z)[:zb0002]
} else {
(*z) = make(redirectionMsgs, zb0002) // <--- CRASH HERE
}
// ... loop to read elements ...
}The variable zb0002 is a uint32 taken directly from the input. If I send a header saying "I have 2 billion items," the Go runtime dutifully attempts to find contiguous memory for 2 billion redirectionMsg structs. It doesn't care that I only sent 5 bytes of actual data.
You don't need a botnet. You don't need a supercomputer. You just need curl and ten hex characters. The attack vector is shockingly simple and affects every endpoint on the server.
The Payload: dd7fffffff
Let's break that down:
dd: The MessagePack marker for Array32 (an array with a 32-bit length).7fffffff: The hexadecimal representation of 2,147,483,647 (MaxInt32).The Attack:
curl -H "Cookie: fiber_flash=dd7fffffff" http://target:3000/When the server receives this, it decodes the hex and hits the allocator. It tries to allocate a slice for 2.14 billion structs. Even if the struct is small (say, 40 bytes), that requires requesting ~85 Gigabytes of RAM instantly.
Unless your server is running on a high-end mainframe, the Go runtime immediately panics with runtime: out of memory. The process dies. If you're running this in Kubernetes without strict restart policies, you just entered a crash loop. If you're on a standard VPS, your service is dead until you wake up and restart it.
The fix in version 3.1.0 is simple sanity checking. You can't fit a gallon of water in a shot glass, and you can't fit 2 billion array elements in a 5-byte payload.
The patched code introduces a check against the remaining bytes in the buffer. Before allocating, it calculates: "Does the remaining input stream have enough bytes to theoretically hold X elements?"
// The Fix Logic (Conceptual)
if availableBytes < (arraySize * minElementSize) {
return error("array size exceeds available data")
}
make(slice, arraySize)By validating that the declared size is physically possible given the input, the allocation is blocked before it hits the OS. This is a classic defense-in-depth strategy: never trust the client's metadata without verifying it against the actual data.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H| Product | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|
GoFiber GoFiber | >= 3.0.0, < 3.1.0 | 3.1.0 |
| Attribute | Detail |
|---|---|
| CWE | CWE-789 (Memory Allocation with Excessive Size Value) |
| CVSS v3.1 | 7.5 (High) |
| Attack Vector | Network (Cookie Header) |
| Impact | Denial of Service (OOM Panic) |
| Authentication | None Required |
| Exploit Status | High (Trivial PoC) |
The product allocates memory based on an untrusted size value, allowing an attacker to cause a denial of service via memory exhaustion.
A high-severity type-confusion vulnerability exists in NearForm fast-jwt prior to version 6.3.0. The vulnerability allows attackers to bypass crucial claim validation steps (such as expiration, issuer, audience, and subject validations) by presenting a validly signed JSON Web Token structured as a JSON array instead of a JSON object. This occurs because the library's decoder fails to reject JSON arrays during type evaluation.
NearForm fast-jwt prior to version 6.3.0 is vulnerable to an input validation flaw where configuring verifier properties (such as clockTolerance, clockTimestamp, and cacheTTL) with non-finite values like Infinity or NaN allows attackers to bypass temporal claim validations, including expiration (exp) and activation (nbf) boundaries. This validation bypass can result in unauthorized session persistence and cache poisoning.
A critical cryptographic vulnerability in fast-jwt versions 6.2.x prior to 6.3.0 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute an asymmetric-to-symmetric algorithm confusion attack due to incomplete validation of leading non-whitespace prefixes.
CVE-2026-107720 is a critical signature verification bypass vulnerability in NearForm's fast-jwt Node.js library. Under specific configurations where the token verifier is initialized with a falsy cryptographic key (such as an empty string or null) and a non-empty algorithms allowlist, the library erroneously skips signature validation. This allows unauthenticated remote attackers to submit fabricated, unsigned JSON Web Tokens and bypass the authorization boundary of the application entirely.
Ruby Mechanize prior to version 2.14.1 contains an information disclosure vulnerability. When executing cross-origin HTTP redirects, global headers configured on the Mechanize agent (such as Authorization or Session Cookies) are dynamically re-applied to the subsequent request, bypassing the internal header-stripping logic. An attacker who controls a redirection endpoint can capture sensitive bearer tokens or cookies.
An origin trust boundary failure in the Ruby mechanize library (prior to v2.14.1) allows unauthenticated remote web servers to harvest sensitive global request headers, such as Authorization Bearer tokens and cookies, by utilizing HTML-level meta-refresh redirection tags. Standard HTTP-level redirect boundaries were not applied to document-level redirects, creating a vector for cross-origin credential leakage during automated crawls.