CVEReports
CVEReports

Automated vulnerability intelligence platform. Comprehensive reports for high-severity CVEs generated by AI.

Product

  • Home
  • Sitemap
  • RSS Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2026 CVEReports. All rights reserved.

Made with love by Amit Schendel & Alon Barad



GHSA-JWF4-8WF4-JF2M

GHSA-JWF4-8WF4-JF2M: Critical Authorization Bypass in OpenClaw BlueBubbles Plugin

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
Software Engineer

Mar 4, 2026·5 min read·35 visits

Executive Summary (TL;DR)

The OpenClaw BlueBubbles plugin fails to enforce access controls when the allowed sender list is empty. Due to a 'fail-open' logic error in the underlying SDK, unconfigured instances accept DMs from any source, granting full interaction with the AI assistant.

A critical access control vulnerability exists in the OpenClaw BlueBubbles plugin due to a logic error in the shared authorization utility. The flaw causes the system to fail-open when the allowlist configuration is empty, permitting unauthorized remote users to bypass Direct Message (DM) gating policies. This allows arbitrary unauthenticated users to interact with the AI assistant, potentially triggering sensitive actions or accessing private data.

Vulnerability Overview

The vulnerability resides in the plugin-sdk component of OpenClaw, specifically within the authorization logic used by the BlueBubbles optional channel extension. OpenClaw is a personal AI assistant infrastructure that aggregates communications from various platforms. The BlueBubbles plugin integrates iMessage and SMS capabilities, allowing the assistant to process and respond to messages.

The core issue is an Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) flaw where the system defaults to an authorized state when no access policies are defined. In a secure configuration, an empty allowlist should result in all traffic being denied until explicitly permitted. However, the vulnerable implementation treated an empty list as a directive to allow all traffic, bypassing the intended pairing or allowlist security modes.

This flaw is particularly critical because pairing is often the default secure mode for new installations. Administrators expecting a 'deny-by-default' posture until devices are paired are instead left exposed to a 'permit-all' state, allowing any actor capable of routing a message to the BlueBubbles instance to interact with the AI agent.

Root Cause Analysis

The root cause is a logic error in the isAllowedParsedChatSender utility function located in src/plugin-sdk/allow-from.ts. This function is responsible for validating whether an incoming message sender is authorized based on the user's configuration.

The function accepts a list of allowed senders (allowFrom). The logic was intended to support a wildcard (*) for public access, but the implementation checked the length of the array to determine the default behavior. Specifically, the code contained a conditional check: if (allowFrom.length === 0). If this condition was met—meaning the user had not yet added any trusted contacts—the function returned true.

This effectively inverted the security model. Instead of failing closed (denying access when no rules exist), the system failed open. The BlueBubbles plugin relies on this boolean return value to gate access to the processMessage and processReaction workflows. Consequently, an uninitialized configuration resulted in the complete bypass of authentication checks.

Code Analysis

The following analysis compares the vulnerable code path with the patched version in src/plugin-sdk/allow-from.ts. The fix involves inverting the return value for empty lists and requiring an explicit wildcard for open access.

Vulnerable Implementation:

export function isAllowedParsedChatSender(params: AllowedParsedChatSenderParams) {
  const allowFrom = params.allowFrom.map((entry) => String(entry).trim());
 
  // VULNERABILITY: If the list is empty, return TRUE (Allow all)
  if (allowFrom.length === 0) {
    return true;
  }
 
  // ... checks for specific sender ID ...
}

Patched Implementation (Commit 9632b9b):

export function isAllowedParsedChatSender(params: AllowedParsedChatSenderParams) {
  const allowFrom = params.allowFrom.map((entry) => String(entry).trim());
 
  // FIX: Fail-closed. If the list is empty, return FALSE (Deny all)
  if (allowFrom.length === 0) {
    return false;
  }
 
  // Explicitly require wildcard for allow-all behavior
  if (allowFrom.includes("*")) {
    return true;
  }
 
  // ... checks for specific sender ID ...
}

The patch ensures that an empty configuration results in a secure state. Additionally, logic was unified in resolveDmGroupAccessDecision to prevent similar drift in reaction processing.

Exploitation Methodology

Exploiting this vulnerability requires no specialized tools or authentication. The attacker simply needs to identify a target OpenClaw instance running the BlueBubbles plugin that has not yet been configured with specific trusted peers.

  1. Reconnaissance: The attacker identifies the target's contact handle (e.g., phone number or email associated with the BlueBubbles/iMessage account).
  2. Interaction: The attacker sends a standard text message or iMessage to the target. The message content typically includes a command understood by the AI, such as "What is my schedule?" or "Turn on the lights."
  3. Bypass Execution:
    • The OpenClaw instance receives the message.
    • The BlueBubbles plugin calls isAllowedParsedChatSender.
    • Due to the unconfigured allowFrom list, the function returns true.
  4. Action: The AI processes the message as if it came from a trusted administrator, executing the command and replying with the output.

The vulnerability also extends to reactions (Tapbacks), allowing an attacker to trigger event-driven workflows simply by reacting to a message history.

Impact Assessment

The impact of this vulnerability is critical due to the capabilities typically granted to personal AI assistants.

  • Confidentiality Loss: Unauthorized users can query the assistant for sensitive data stored in its memory (Vector DB) or accessible via connected APIs (e.g., calendar entries, emails, notes).
  • Integrity Violation: Attackers can inject false information into the assistant's memory or trigger state changes in connected systems (e.g., modifying smart home devices, sending messages on behalf of the user).
  • Resource Exhaustion: An attacker can spam the assistant with complex queries, driving up LLM API costs (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.) or exhausting local compute resources.

The CVSS score is estimated at 9.8 (Critical) because the attack vector is network-based (via the messaging platform), requires no privileges, requires no user interaction, and results in a total compromise of the confidentiality and integrity of the AI agent's operations.

Official Patches

OpenClawFix: fail closed parsed chat allowlist
OpenClawRefactor: make empty allowlist behavior explicit

Fix Analysis (1)

Technical Appendix

CVSS Score
9.8/ 10
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Affected Systems

OpenClaw (Core)OpenClaw BlueBubbles Plugin

Affected Versions Detail

Product
Affected Versions
Fixed Version
OpenClaw
OpenClaw
< Feb 22, 2026commit 9632b9b
AttributeDetail
CWE IDCWE-863
Attack VectorNetwork
CVSS9.8 (Critical)
ImpactAuthorization Bypass
Exploit StatusPoC Available
Fix ComplexityLow (Logic Update)

MITRE ATT&CK Mapping

T1190Exploit Public-Facing Application
Initial Access
T1078Valid Accounts
Defense Evasion
CWE-863
Incorrect Authorization

The software does not provide sufficient authorization for an actor to access a resource or perform an action, or it incorrectly validates the authorization.

Known Exploits & Detection

Internal ResearchLogic flaw demonstrated in commit history.

Vulnerability Timeline

Vulnerability identified in adjacent plugins
2026-02-15
Root cause identified in plugin-sdk
2026-02-21
Fix merged to main branch
2026-02-21
GHSA-JWF4-8WF4-JF2M Published
2026-02-22

References & Sources

  • [1]GitHub Advisory GHSA-JWF4-8WF4-JF2M
  • [2]OpenClaw Security Documentation

Attack Flow Diagram

Press enter or space to select a node. You can then use the arrow keys to move the node around. Press delete to remove it and escape to cancel.
Press enter or space to select an edge. You can then press delete to remove it or escape to cancel.

More Reports

•13 minutes ago•CVE-2026-118764
6.9

CVE-2026-118764: Asymmetric Resource Consumption and Denial of Service in minimatch Pattern Preprocessing

CVE-2026-118764 (also tracked as GHSA-g3hv-75wg-m249) is an asymmetric resource consumption vulnerability (CWE-405) in the npm package minimatch prior to version 11.0.1. When pattern compilation is invoked with an optimizationLevel of 2 or higher, the internal preprocessing functions firstPhasePreProcess() and secondPhasePreProcess() in src/index.ts perform unbounded pattern splitting and quadratic pairwise deduplication. An attacker supplying a crafted glob string containing repeated **/.. segments can induce a combinatorial explosion of pattern permutations followed by an O(M^2) comparison routine, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting process memory.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
1 views•9 min read
•about 1 hour ago•CVE-2026-119202
7.5

CVE-2026-119202: Regular Expression Denial of Service in @hapi/content Header Parsing

A regular expression denial of service (ReDoS) vulnerability exists in @hapi/content from version 3.0.6 prior to 6.0.3. The Content.disposition() function utilizes an unanchored parameter-name regular expression inside a global replacement scan. When processing a Content-Disposition header parameter containing a long token lacking an equals sign, the JavaScript regular expression engine undergoes quadratic O(N^2) backtracking. Because @hapi/content is invoked by @hapi/pez during multipart/form-data request parsing, unauthenticated remote attackers can send a crafted multipart request to any Hapi route with multipart payload parsing enabled, starving the single-threaded Node.js event loop.

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
3 views•9 min read
•about 2 hours ago•CVE-2026-118772
7.5

CVE-2026-118772: Regular Expression Denial of Service in Joi Email Validation

A Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability exists in the joi schema description and data validation library for JavaScript. When validating multiple email addresses using the Joi.string().email({ multiple: true }) configuration, the library compiles a separator regular expression with an unanchored greedy leading whitespace quantifier. Supplying an input string containing a long sequence of whitespace characters without the expected delimiter triggers quadratic time complexity during String.prototype.split execution, blocking the single-threaded Node.js event loop.

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
3 views•11 min read
•about 3 hours ago•CVE-2026-119205
7.1

CVE-2026-119205: Denial of Service via Infinite Loop in pypdf DictionaryObject Cloning

CVE-2026-119205 (GHSA-mfr5-77xh-9j7h) is a Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability in pypdf prior to version 6.21.4. The flaw occurs during the cloning or duplication of nested PDF dictionary structures. Because the cycle-detection algorithm within DictionaryObject._clone() tracked generated destination object references rather than the original source indirect references, cyclic reference graphs in source PDFs evaded detection, resulting in an infinite loop and CPU exhaustion.

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
4 views•9 min read
•about 4 hours ago•CVE-2026-119204
7.1

CVE-2026-119204: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption in pypdf Page Tree Flattening

CVE-2026-119204 (also tracked as GHSA-cggf-277g-3q54) is a Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability in pypdf prior to version 6.21.4. The vulnerability stems from uncontrolled resource consumption (CWE-400) during the flattening of a PDF document's page tree. By supplying a compact PDF containing a hierarchical amplification structure of shared `/Pages` and `/Page` nodes with dense dictionary entries or inherited resources, an unauthenticated attacker can cause pypdf to copy millions of dictionary entries into individual `PageObject` instances without enforcing a document-wide entry budget. This triggers severe heap memory exhaustion and process termination via Out-Of-Memory (OOM) kills.

Alon Barad
Alon Barad
4 views•11 min read
•about 5 hours ago•CVE-2026-119203
7.1

CVE-2026-119203: Infinite Loop in pypdf Standard Cross-Reference Table Parser

CVE-2026-119203 is a denial-of-service vulnerability affecting the pypdf library in versions prior to 6.21.4. The flaw occurs within the standard cross-reference (xref) table parsing routine when processing truncated or malformed PDF streams that terminate before a valid trailer dictionary is encountered. Because the parser attempts to rewind the stream pointer by a fixed offset whenever the trailer token is absent without verifying forward progress, hitting the end-of-file (EOF) or non-advancing tokens causes the parser to re-read the same byte offset indefinitely. An unauthenticated attacker can exploit this flaw by supplying a crafted PDF document to an application using pypdf, resulting in continuous CPU consumption and thread exhaustion.

Amit Schendel
Amit Schendel
4 views•9 min read