Mar 2, 2026·5 min read·7 visits
OpenClaw's skill syncing logic fails to sanitize skill names, allowing malicious skills to write files outside the sandbox directory via path traversal characters.
A critical path traversal vulnerability exists in the OpenClaw (Moltbot) AI agent framework within its skill mirroring mechanism. The vulnerability allows a malicious actor to escape the intended sandbox environment by manipulating skill metadata. Specifically, the `syncSkillsToWorkspace` function improperly constructs file destination paths using unvalidated user input, enabling arbitrary file writes to the host filesystem.
The OpenClaw framework (also known as Moltbot) creates sandbox environments to safely execute AI "skills"—modular capabilities defined by users or third parties. A core component of this architecture is the skill mirroring mechanism, specifically the syncSkillsToWorkspace function, which copies skill source files from a repository into a designated workspace directory for execution.
A path traversal vulnerability (CWE-22) was identified in how this function handles destination paths. When syncing a skill, the system determines the target directory using metadata provided within the skill itself (specifically the name field in SKILL.md). Because this input was not validated or sanitized, a malicious skill definition could manipulate the destination path, effectively breaking out of the sandbox confinement. This flaw allows an attacker to write arbitrary files to the host system with the privileges of the OpenClaw process.
The root cause lies in the insecure concatenation of user-controlled input with a filesystem path without prior validation. The vulnerable code used the standard Node.js path.join() function to construct the destination directory for a skill. While path.join normalizes paths, it does not prevent directory traversal if the segments themselves contain traversal sequences like ../.
In the vulnerable implementation, the code extracted the name property directly from the skill's frontmatter configuration and appended it to the targetSkillsDir. A malicious actor could define a skill name such as ../../../etc/cron.d/, causing the subsequent copy operation (fsp.cp) to write files outside the intended targetSkillsDir. The application implicitly trusted that the metadata name would be a safe, valid directory name, rather than treating it as untrusted input.
Crucially, the system lacked a boundary check—such as resolving the final path and ensuring it starts with the expected root path—before performing the file operation.
The following analysis contrasts the vulnerable logic with the remediated code in src/agents/skills/workspace.ts.
Vulnerable Code: The original implementation directly joined the target directory with the potentially malicious skill name.
// src/agents/skills/workspace.ts (Pre-patch)
for (const entry of entries) {
// VULNERABILITY: entry.skill.name is user-controlled and unsanitized.
// If name is "../../escaped", dest becomes outside targetSkillsDir.
const dest = path.join(targetSkillsDir, entry.skill.name);
try {
// Recursive copy writes files to the traversal path
await fsp.cp(entry.skill.baseDir, dest, { recursive: true });
// ...
} catch (error) {
// ...
}
}Fixed Code:
The patch abandons the use of the user-defined name for filesystem operations. Instead, it derives the directory name from the source path's basename (which is local and trusted in this context) and employs a strict path resolution utility.
// src/agents/skills/workspace.ts (Patched)
function resolveSyncedSkillDestinationPath(params: {
targetSkillsDir: string;
entry: SkillEntry;
usedDirNames: Set<string>;
}): string | null {
// 1. Use filesystem basename instead of arbitrary metadata name
const sourceDirName = path.basename(params.entry.skill.baseDir).trim();
// 2. Reject suspicious directory names explicitly
if (!sourceDirName || sourceDirName === "." || sourceDirName === "..") {
return null;
}
// 3. Resolve a unique name to prevent collisions
const uniqueDirName = resolveUniqueSyncedSkillDirName(sourceDirName, params.usedDirNames);
// 4. SECURITY CHECK: resolveSandboxPath ensures the path stays inside root
// If the resulting path escapes targetSkillsDir, this throws or returns null
return resolveSandboxPath({
filePath: uniqueDirName,
cwd: params.targetSkillsDir,
root: params.targetSkillsDir,
}).resolved;
}To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker requires the ability to introduce a new skill to the OpenClaw instance. This could occur in scenarios where the agent pulls skills from a public repository or processes a user-submitted skill bundle.
Attack Steps:
SKILL.md file. In the frontmatter of this file, they set the name field to a traversal payload, e.g., name: "../../../.ssh".syncSkillsToWorkspace function.[sandbox_root]/../../../.ssh (effectively ~/.ssh on the host).authorized_keys file) to the target directory. The attacker now has SSH access to the host machine.This vector is particularly dangerous because it bypasses the primary security mechanism of the agent—the sandbox—allowing for immediate escalation from agent control to host compromise.
The impact of this vulnerability is rated High due to the potential for arbitrary file write leading to Remote Code Execution (RCE).
The vulnerability is an "Arbitrary File Write via Path Traversal" (CWE-22). In containerized environments, this might allow escaping the application directory to the container root. In non-containerized deployments, it could lead to full host compromise.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H| Product | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|
openclaw openclaw | < 2026.2.13 | 2026.2.13 |
| Attribute | Detail |
|---|---|
| CWE ID | CWE-22 |
| Vulnerability Type | Path Traversal |
| Severity | High |
| Attack Vector | Network / File Input |
| Impact | Arbitrary File Write / Sandbox Escape |
| Patch Date | 2026-02-13 |
A state persistence vulnerability exists in Tornado's CurlAsyncHTTPClient component where pooled pycurl.Curl handles are reused across asynchronous requests without a complete state reset. Consequently, sensitive per-request configurations, such as client TLS certificates or proxy basic authentication credentials, persist on the shared handle. This behavior leads to subsequent requests leaking these credentials to unauthorized remote servers.
CVE-2026-48748 is a denial-of-service vulnerability in Netty's HTTP/3 codec (netty-codec-http3) occurring when QPACK dynamic tables are enabled but the blocked streams limit is not explicitly configured. A bug in limit checking and a memory leak in stream tracking allow unauthenticated remote attackers to exhaust the JVM heap memory and crash the server.
CVE-2026-50009 is a cryptographic design vulnerability in the Netty network application framework. Prior to version 4.2.15.Final, the framework's QUIC protocol implementation fails to cryptographically segregate the generated Connection IDs and the associated Stateless Reset Tokens. An on-path network attacker who sniffs traffic during a Connection ID rotation can extract secret token material from cleartext headers, enabling them to inject spoofed reset packets and terminate active connections.
A critical hostname verification bypass vulnerability exists in the Netty network application framework when configured as a TLS client. When a developer registers a custom plain X509TrustManager, Netty wraps it inside an X509TrustManagerWrapper to adapt it to the X509ExtendedTrustManager API. However, this wrapper discards the SSLEngine context, bypassing critical hostname checks. Because the wrapper is identified as an X509ExtendedTrustManager, standard cryptographic engines and Netty's OpenSSL wrappers do not re-wrap it, failing to execute any hostname validation. Consequently, clients silently accept certificates for any host, enabling unauthenticated Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) attacks.
An uncontrolled resource pre-allocation flaw in the Netty Redis codec module allows remote unauthenticated attackers to cause a denial of service (OutOfMemoryError) by sending a crafted Redis Serialization Protocol (RESP) array header.
CVE-2026-50020 is a medium-severity HTTP Request Smuggling/Response Smuggling vulnerability (CWE-444) within the Netty asynchronous network application framework. The flaw resides in Netty's HTTP codec implementation, specifically the HttpObjectDecoder class, which silently consumes arbitrary ISO control bytes preceding the first request line.